The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Playing Politics with Science
Abstract
Here David B. Resnik explores the philosophical, political, and ethical issues related to the politicalization of science and develops a conceptual framework for thinking about government restrictions on scientific practice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is ample evidence that scientists sometimes incorporate various biases into their study designs [44–47].”
From Autonomous artificial intelligence, scientific research, and human values (2026) · cites this paper as [45]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Politicization and COVID-19 vaccine resistance in the U.S.
Bolsen, T., & Palm, R. I. (2022) · Progress in molecular biology and translational science · doi:10.1016/bs.pmbts.2021.10.002 · Cited by 266
Responsible Conduct of Research
Shamoo, A. E., & Resnik, D. B. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197547090.001.0001 · Cited by 224
Self-citationResnik, D. B., & Hosseini, M. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00493-8 · Cited by 228
Self-citationScience, Policy, and the Transparency of Values
Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2014) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1408107 · Cited by 154
Self-citationThe Ethical Challenges of Socially Responsible Science
Resnik, D. B., & Elliott, K. C. (2016) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989621.2014.1002608 · Cited by 131
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Resnik, D. B.
- Corresponding author
- Resnik, David B.
- ORCID
- Resnik, David B.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2009-05-01
- OpenAlex
- W2494018429
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 1.05
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Research, Science, and Academia
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Academic Freedom and Politics
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Keywords
- science and politics, autonomy of science, research autonomy, government science advice, government research funding, national security, human subjects research, animal studies, research integrity, financial accountability, science education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Playing Politics with Science. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195375893.001.0001
- The paper
- Resnik, D. B. (2009). Playing Politics with Science. Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780195375893.001.0001
