The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measurement Issues in Dissemination and Implementation Research
Abstract
This chapter advances the concept of “dissemination and implementation (D&I) outcomes” distinct from service system and health outcomes. It proposes several concepts that comprise D&I outcomes and discusses challenges and opportunities in their measurement. Conceptualizing and measuring D&I outcomes will advance understanding of D&I processes and their empirical study. It argues that the progress of D&I science requires the development of reliable and valid measures of outcomes. Reliable and valid measures of D&I outcomes will enable empirical testing of the success of efforts to disseminate and implement new interventions, and pave the way for comparative effectiveness research on D&I strategies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Researchers currently face significant challenges in measuring implementation-related phenomena.
“As a number of scholars have noted, researchers currently face significant challenges in measuring implementation-related phenomena [5-7].”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting
Proctor, E. K., Powell, B. J., & McMillen, J. C. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-139 · Cited by 2,585
Self-citationBridging Research and Practice
Tabak, R. G., Khoong, E. C., Chambers, D. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2012) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.024 · Cited by 1,386
Self-citationChaudoir, S. R., Dugan, A. G., & Barr, C. H. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-22 · Cited by 800
A Systematic Review of Strategies for Implementing Empirically Supported Mental Health Interventions
Powell, B. J., Proctor, E. K., & Glass, J. E. (2014) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731513505778 · Cited by 268
Self-citationInstrumentation issues in implementation science
Martinez, R. G., Lewis, C. C., & Weiner, B. J. (2014) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-014-0118-8 · Cited by 243
Writing implementation research grant proposals: ten key ingredients
Proctor, E. K., Powell, B. J., Baumann, A. A., Hamilton, A. M., & Santens, R. L. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-96 · Cited by 169
Self-citationQuantitative measures of health policy implementation determinants and outcomes: a systematic review
Allen, P., Pilar, M., Walsh-Bailey, C., Hooley, C., Mazzucca, S., Lewis, C. C., Mettert, K. D., Dorsey, C. N., Purtle, J., Kepper, M. M., et al. (2020) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-020-01007-w · Cited by 164
Self-citationAn updated protocol for a systematic review of implementation-related measures
Lewis, C. C., Mettert, K. D., Dorsey, C. N., Martinez, R. G., Weiner, B. J., Nolen, E., Stanick, C., Halko, H., & Powell, B. J. (2018) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-018-0728-3 · Cited by 118
Measures for Predictors of Innovation Adoption
Chor, K. H. B., Wisdom, J. P., Olin, S.-C. S., Hoagwood, K. E., & Horwitz, S. M. (2015) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-014-0551-7 · Cited by 85
Contextual Influences and Strategies for Dissemination and Implementation in Mental Health
Benjamin Wolk, C., Powell, B. J., & Beidas, R. S. (2015) · Oxford Handbook Topics in Psychology · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935291.013.12 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Proctor, E. K., & Brownson, R. C.
- Venue
- Dissemination and Implementation Research in HealthTranslating Science to Practice
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2012-03-29
- Pages
- 261-280
- OpenAlex
- W2496346874
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 48.76
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Keywords
- dissemination and implementation research, outcome measurement, reliability and validity, implementation strategies, comparative effectiveness research, intervention dissemination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
