Cited by 85Health Policy Implementation ScienceAgricultural Innovations and PracticesInnovation Diffusion and Forecasting

Measures for Predictors of Innovation Adoption

Open access
Chor, Ka Ho Brian, Wisdom, Jennifer P., Olin, Su-Chin Serene, Hoagwood, Kimberly E., Horwitz, Sarah M.·2015·Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

Abstract

Building on a narrative synthesis of adoption theories by Wisdom et al. (2013), this review identifies 118 measures associated with the 27 adoption predictors in the synthesis. The distribution of measures is uneven across the predictors and predictors vary in modifiability. Multiple dimensions and definitions of predictors further complicate measurement efforts. For state policymakers and researchers, more effective and integrated measurement can advance the adoption of complex innovations such as evidence-based practices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10488-014-0551-7

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Systematic reviews of implementation context measures have all found significant gaps and signal the continued need for measure validation and development.

    “Systematic reviews of implementation context measures have been conducted, all of which have found significant gaps and signal the continued need for measure validation and development [89–95].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Finnerty M Leckman-Westin E Kealey E Wisdom JP Olin S Horwitz S Hoagwood K 2012 Impact of state incentives on mental health agency decisions to participate in a large state CQI initiative Paper presented at the 5th Annual NIH Conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation Bethesda, MD
  2. Seattle Implementation Research Collaborative 2013 Instrument Review Project: A comprehensive review of dissemination a nd implementation science instruments Retrieved January 3, 2014, from http://www.seattleimplementation.org/sirc-projects/sirc-instrument-project/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chor, K. H. B., Wisdom, J. P., Olin, S.-C. S., Hoagwood, K. E., & Horwitz, S. M.
Affiliations
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
Chor, Ka Ho Brian
Venue
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Published
2014-04-17
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
545-573
ISSN
  • 0894-587X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3289
OpenAlex
W2061089897
Cited by
85
References
82
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (P30MH090322)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
Keywords
innovation adoption, adoption theory, evidence-based practice, mental health services, state mental health policy, complex innovation
MeSH terms
Diffusion of Innovation, Health Services Research, Humans, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review