Cited by 257Philosophy and History of SciencePhilosophy, Science, and HistoryPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

Laws and Lawmakers Science, Metaphysics, and the Laws of Nature

Lange, Marc·2009·Oxford University Press eBooks

Abstract

What distinguishes laws of nature from ordinary facts? What are the 'lawmakers': the facts in virtue of which the laws are laws? How can laws be necessary, yet contingent? Lange provocatively argues that laws are distinguished by their necessity, while also providing a non-technical and accessible survey of the field.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195328134.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lange calls symmetries metalaws.

    “Lange (2009) calls them metalaws.”
  • Panpsychism has some structural similarities to the theories of Lange (2009) and Whittle (2009), so it is susceptible to the Peril of Insufficient Structure as well.

    “Panpsychism has some structural similarities to the theories ofLange (2009) andWhittle (2009), so we are inclined to think that it is susceptible to the Peril of Insufficient Structure as well.”

    From The nomological argument for the existence of God (2022) · cites this paper as Lange (2009)

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lange, M.
Corresponding author
Lange, Marc
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2009-09-01
OpenAlex
W4300570223
Cited by
257
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 9
FWCI
15.87
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
laws of nature, metaphysics of law, necessity of law, science and law, philosophy of science, philosophy of law

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review