Cited by 44Research, Science, and AcademiaAcademic Freedom and PoliticsAcademic integrity and plagiarism

Playing Politics with Science

Resnik, David B.·2009·Oxford University Press eBooks

Abstract

Here David B. Resnik explores the philosophical, political, and ethical issues related to the politicalization of science and develops a conceptual framework for thinking about government restrictions on scientific practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195375893.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Resnik, D. B.
Corresponding author
Resnik, David B.
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2009-05-01
OpenAlex
W2494018429
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.05
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Academic Freedom and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
Keywords
science and politics, autonomy of science, research autonomy, government science advice, government research funding, national security, human subjects research, animal studies, research integrity, financial accountability, science education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review