The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How To Do Things With Words
Open accessAbstract
This work sets out the author's conclusions in the field to which he directed his main efforts for at least the last ten years of his life. Starting from an examination of his already well-known distinction between performative utterances and statements, he finally abandons that distinction, replacing it with a more general theory of ‘illocutionary forces’ of utterances, which has important bearings on a wide variety of philosophical problems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Bourdieu borrowed from Austin (1975: 16) in emphasizing ' misfires ' or blips, instances in which attempted speech acts (or by extension, attempted practices of any sort) fail because of some maladaption of practice to the situation (Austin's 'infelicities').”
From Bourdieu, Historicity, and Historical Sociology (2011) · cites this paper as Austin, 1975
In the citing paper
“Not knowing these intended meanings or illocutions, in Austin's (1975) words, interlocutors' misunderstanding is inevitable.”
From Teachers’ Classroom Interactional Competence: Scale Development and Validation (2023) · cites this paper as Austin's (1975)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,201–1,300 of 21,466
dropping remarks and the Barbadian audience 1
Fisher, L. E. (1976) · American Ethnologist · doi:10.1525/ae.1976.3.2.02a00040 · Cited by 86
A logic model for electronic contracting
Lee, R. M. (1988) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/0167-9236(88)90096-6 · Cited by 86
Discourse and the No-thing-ness of Culture
Silverstein, M. C. (2013) · Signs and Society · doi:10.1086/673252 · Cited by 94
‘Doing denial’: audience reaction to human rights appeals
Seu, I. B. (2010) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926510366199 · Cited by 85
van Tol, D. G., Rietjens, J. A. C., & van der Heide, A. (2010) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.04.007 · Cited by 85
Characterizing Online Discussion Using Coarse Discourse Sequences
Zhang, A. X., Culbertson, B., & Paritosh, P. K. (2017) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14886 · Cited by 85
Thinking machines: Can there be? Are we?
Winograd, T. A. (1990) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511663116.017 · Cited by 85
Tacit knowledge and the epistemology of expertise in strategic marketing management
Hackley, C. (1999) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090569910274348 · Cited by 85
Reconceptualizing E-Mail Overload
Thomas, G., King, C. L., Baroni, B., Cook, L., Keitelman, M., Miller, S., & Wardle, A. (2006) · Journal of Business and Technical Communication · doi:10.1177/1050651906287253 · Cited by 98
Humor Mechanisms in Film Comedy: Incongruity and Superiority
Vandaele, J. (2002) · Poetics Today · doi:10.1215/03335372-23-2-221 · Cited by 85
Silverstein, B. (2008) · Cultural Anthropology · doi:10.1111/j.1548-1360.2008.00005.x · Cited by 85
Persona-fied brands: managing branded persons through persona
Dion, D., & Arnould, E. J. (2015) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2015.1096818 · Cited by 85
Rhetoric and Conceptual Change
Skinner, Q. (1999) · Redescriptions Political Thought Conceptual History and Feminist Theory · doi:10.7227/r.3.1.5 · Cited by 85
DEMO: Towards a discipline of organisation engineering
Dietz, J. L. G. (2001) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(00)00077-1 · Cited by 85
Risk and Trust: The Performative Dimension 1
Szerszynski, B. (1999) · Environmental Values · doi:10.1177/096327199900800207 · Cited by 85
Indexicality’s Ambivalent Ground
Nakassis, C. V. (2018) · Signs and Society · doi:10.1086/694753 · Cited by 85
Saito, H., & Beecken, M. (1997) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05497.x · Cited by 84
English tag questions in universal grammar
Culicover, P. W. (1992) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/0024-3841(92)90042-h · Cited by 84
Turnbull, W. W., & Saxton, K. L. (1997) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(96)00034-3 · Cited by 84
Input to interaction to instruction: three key shifts in the history of child language research
Snow, C. E. (2014) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000914000294 · Cited by 99
Participant Roles, Frames, and Speech Acts
McCawley, J. D. (1999) · Linguistics and Philosophy · doi:10.1023/a:1005563915544 · Cited by 84
Populism as a Transgressive Style
Aiolfi, T. (2022) · Global Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isagsq/ksac006 · Cited by 112
Nonsense and Meaning in Ancient Greek Comedy
Kidd, S. E. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107279322 · Cited by 84
Towards a communicative model of collaborative web-mediated learning
Ćećez-Kecmanović, D., & Webb, C. (2000) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.1823 · Cited by 84
Contexts in Action—And the Future of the Past in STS
Asdal, K. (2012) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243912438271 · Cited by 84
Challenges in Critical Language Teaching
Pessoa, R. R., & Freitas, M. T. D. U. (2012) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.46 · Cited by 84
Dicing with Deception: People with Disabilities' Strategies for Managing Safety and Identity Online
Bowker, N., & Tuffin, K. F. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00209.x · Cited by 84
Blended Learning as a Strategy to Improve Collaborative Task Performance
Schweizer, K., Paechter, M., & Weidenmann, B. (2003) · Journal of Educational Television · doi:10.1080/1358165032000165699 · Cited by 82
Verhagen, H. (2000) · Cited by 85
Strategy and structure in conversational influence attempts
Jacobs, S., & Jackson, S. (1983) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637758309390171 · Cited by 86
How do skilled and less‐skilled spellers write text messages? A longitudinal study
Bernicot, J., Goumi, A., Bert‐Erboul, A., et al. (2014) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12064 · Cited by 83
“…Ravid & Tolchinski, 2002), within the framework of pragmatic studies, which attempt to relate linguistic productions to the communicative situation in which they are produced (Austin, 1962; Bernicot, Laval, & Chaminaud, 2007; Clark & Bernicot, 2008; Grice, 1975; Searle, 1969; Verschueren, 1999).”
BackgroundBurrell, J., & Oreglia, E. (2015) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085147.2015.1013742 · Cited by 83
A comparative analysis of linguistic routines in two languages: English and ewe
Ameka, F. K. (1987) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/0378-2166(87)90135-4 · Cited by 83
Politeness, relevance and scalar inferences
Mazzarella, D. (2015) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.016 · Cited by 84
Pragmatic comprehension deficit in Parkinson's disease
Holtgraves, T., & McNamara, P. (2009) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13803390903130729 · Cited by 83
The interpretive dimension of economics: Science, hermeneutics, and praxeology
Lavoie, D. (2011) · The Review of Austrian Economics · doi:10.1007/s11138-010-0137-x · Cited by 83
Kumar, N., Qiu, L.-F., & Kumar, S. (2017) · Information systems research · doi:10.1287/isre.2022.1107 · Cited by 71
Keegan, P. (2020) · The Journal of Social Studies Research · doi:10.1016/j.jssr.2020.06.003 · Cited by 107
“Perlocutionary speech-acts have an effect not only on the world, but on the subjectivity of the listener by “producing certain consequential effects upon the feelings, thoughts, or actions of the audience, or of the speaker, or of other persons” (Austin, 1962, p. 101).”
BackgroundPoliteness and Face in Caribbean Creoles
Migge, B., & Mühleisen, S. (2005) · Varieties of English around the world. General series · doi:10.1075/veaw.g34 · Cited by 83
Performing the sacred: a Durkheimian perspective on the performative turn in the social sciences
Giesen, B. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511616839.012 · Cited by 82
Murphy, T., O’Connell, V., & hÓgartaigh, C. Ó. (2012) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2012.07.003 · Cited by 83
The simplicity complex: exploring simplified health messages in a complex world
Zarcadoolas, C. (2010) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/daq075 · Cited by 83
“Conversely, Rewrites B and C (Figure 4) use basic and cohesive text rules that actually make the text more readable (Grice, 1957; Austin, 1962; Grice, 1967; Searle, Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/heapro/article-abstract/26/3/338/663305 by guest on 29 July 2018 1969; van Dijk, 2001).”
BackgroundMethodA commitment-based approach to agent speech acts and conversations
Colombetti, M. (2000) · Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) · Cited by 83
Bottineau, D. (2010) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/8629.003.0011 · Cited by 89
A model for deliberation, action, and introspection
Doyle, J. (1981) · ACM SIGART Bulletin · doi:10.1145/1056748.1056749 · Cited by 85
Commentary: Foundations in performance
Bauman, R. (2011) · Journal of Sociolinguistics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00510.x · Cited by 83
Wibowo, A., & Paramita, W. (2022) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/15480518211068735 · Cited by 85
“Under the auspices of the speech acts theory (Austin, 1975) which segmented spoken words into three categories— perlocutionary (language that expresses the speaker’s desired goals), elocutionary (the language which emphasizes meaning), and illocutionary (language that shows the speaker’s actions while communicating)—S…”
BackgroundSome Remarks About Speech Act Pluralism
Sbisà, M. (2013) · Perspectives in pragmatics, psychology & philosophy · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-01011-3_10 · Cited by 82
The pragmatics of verbal parody
Rossen-Knill, D. F., & Henry, R. (1997) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(96)00054-9 · Cited by 82
Chakrabarti, C., & Luger, G. F. (2015) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.067 · Cited by 83
Allan, K. (2010) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.017 · Cited by 82
Selecting Genres for Transfer: The Role of Uptake in Students' Antecedent Genre Knowledge.
Rounsaville, A. (2012) · Composition Forum · Cited by 81
What if…? Imagining non-Western perspectives on pragmatic theory and practice
Ameka, F. K., & Terkourafi, M. (2019) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2019.04.001 · Cited by 82
“Finnegan (1969) investigated performatives in Limba (lia), an Atlantic language of Sierra Leone shortly after speech act theory was proposed by Austin (1962).”
BackgroundDesórdenes informativos: sobreexpuestos e infrainformados en la era de la posverdad
Del-Fresno-García, M. (2019) · El Profesional de la Informacion · doi:10.3145/epi.2019.may.02 · Cited by 110
Possibilities as the foundation of reasoning
Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Ragni, M. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.019 · Cited by 83
Epistemic injustice and epistemic positioning: towards an intersectional political economy
Baćević, J. (2021) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/00113921211057609 · Cited by 89
Haber, Y., Levkovich, I., Hadar‐Shoval, D., & Elyoseph, Z. (2024) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/54781 · Cited by 83
Mapping the topography of couples’ daily conversation
Alberts, J. K., Yoshimura, C. G., Rabby, M. K., et al. (2005) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407505050941 · Cited by 82
Bunch, G. C. (2014) · International Multilingual Research Journal · doi:10.1080/19313152.2014.852431 · Cited by 82
Towards a better use of psychoanalytic concepts: a model illustrated using the concept of enactment
Bohleber, W., Fonagy, P., Jiménez, J. P., et al. (2013) · The International Journal of Psychoanalysis · doi:10.1111/1745-8315.12075 · Cited by 82
“Classics in those fields are Austin (1962) and Searle (1969), both incorporating the pragmatics of language and the ‘perlocutionary’ effects of speech.”
BackgroundOn drifting rules and standards
Ortmann, G. (2010) · Scandinavian Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2010.02.004 · Cited by 82
Introducción a la lingüística hispánica
Hualde, J. I., Olarrea, A., Escobar, A. M., Travis, C. E., & Sanz, C. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108770293 · Cited by 89
IT support for clinical pathways—Lessons learned
Lenz, R., Blaser, R., Beyer, M., et al. (2007) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.04.012 · Cited by 82
Cross-organizational workflow integration using contracts
Weigand, H., & van den Heuvel, W. (2002) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/s0167-9236(02)00015-5 · Cited by 82
Bureaucracies as deontic systems
Lee, R. M. (1988) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/45941.45944 · Cited by 82
Artificial Intelligence Prepares for 2001
Nilsson, N. J. (1983) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v4i4.411 · Cited by 84
Beyond data as representation: The performativity of Big Data in surveillance
Matzner, T. (2016) · Surveillance & Society · doi:10.24908/ss.v14i2.5831 · Cited by 78
Alcázar, A., & Saltarelli, M. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511794391 · Cited by 81
Fiedler, K. (2011) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203837702 · Cited by 48
Collaborative and cooperative approaches to online group work: The impact of task type
Paulus, T. M. (2005) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587910500081343 · Cited by 81
Gestures of apes and pre-linguistic human children: Similar or different?
Pika, S. (2008) · First Language · doi:10.1177/0142723707080966 · Cited by 82
Ontology and Semantic Interoperability
Bittner, T., Donnelly, M., & Winter, S. (2005) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420036282-7 · Cited by 81
Proficiency and preference organization in second language refusals
Al‐Gahtani, S., & Roever, C. (2018) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2018.01.014 · Cited by 86
“Refusals can be conceptualized from a speech act perspective as commissives (Austin, 1962; Searle, 1976), committing the speaker to a course of action.”
BackgroundIn Other Words: Variation in Reference and Narrative
Schiffrin, D. (2006) · Cited by 80
Utilizing statistical dialogue act processing in VERBMOBIL
Reithinger, N., & Maier, E. (1995) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) · doi:10.3115/981658.981674 · Cited by 81
Pragmatic assessment in adult aphasia: A clinical review
Manochiopinig, S., Sheard, C., & Reed, V. A. (1992) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687039208249489 · Cited by 81
Kurian, G. T. (2011) · CQ Press eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781608712434.n533 · Cited by 81
Can We Believe What We Do Not Understand?
Récanati, F. (1997) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.1997.tb00063.x · Cited by 80
Clause-type, primary illocution, and mood-like operators in English
Allan, K. (2005) · Language Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2004.12.001 · Cited by 80
Journalistic quotation: Reported speech in newspapers from a semiotic-linguistic perspective
Harry, J. C. (2013) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/1464884913504258 · Cited by 80
Marked Initial Pitch in Questions Signals Marked Communicative Function
Sicoli, M. A., Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., & Levinson, S. C. (2014) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/0023830914529247 · Cited by 81
Retweeting: its linguistic and epistemic value
Marsili, N. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02731-y · Cited by 87
“It is uncontroversial that microblogging involves performing speech acts with illocutionary force, in the traditional sense (e.g. Austin 1962; Alston 1964; Searle 1969).”
BackgroundAccounting as codified discourse
Llewellyn, S., & Milne, M. J. (2007) · Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/09513570710830254 · Cited by 80
Rorty, A. O. (1972) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/00201747208601665 · Cited by 80
Political discourse as mediated and public discourse
Fetzer, A., & Weizman, E. (2005) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.014 · Cited by 80
Realism and Instrumentalism in 19th-Century Atomism
Gardner, M. R. (1979) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/288848 · Cited by 80
Agent technology for collaborative process planning: a review
Zhang, W. J., & Xie, S. Q. (2006) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-005-0345-x · Cited by 81
Owen, G. J., Belam, J., Lambert, H., Donovan, J., Rapport, F., & Owens, C. V. (2012) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.058 · Cited by 80
Semi-supervised speech act recognition in emails and forums
Jeong, M., Lin, C.-Y., & Lee, G. G. (2009) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/1699648.1699671 · Cited by 80
Sacrifice and the problem of beginning: meditations from Sakalava mythopraxis
Lambek, M. (2007) · Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00411.x · Cited by 80
Ågerfalk, P. J. (2010) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2010.22 · Cited by 80
The atoms, molecules and fibers of organizations
Dietz, J. L. G. (2003) · Data & Knowledge Engineering · doi:10.1016/s0169-023x(03)00062-4 · Cited by 80
A Lexical-Constructional Model Account of Illocution
Hernández, L. P., & Ibáñez, F. J. R. D. M. (2011) · Vial-vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics · Cited by 79
Introducing a corpus of conversational stories. Construction and annotation of the Narrative Corpus
Rühlemann, C., & O’Donnell, M. B. (2012) · Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory · doi:10.1515/cllt-2012-0015 · Cited by 79
“Just tell us what to do”: Southern African face and its relevance to intercultural communication
Grainger, K. P., Mills, S., & Sibanda, M. (2010) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.017 · Cited by 79
Performing Nature at World's Ends
Abram, S. A., & Lien, M. E. (2011) · Ethnos · doi:10.1080/00141844.2010.544855 · Cited by 78
“Another inspiration for the turn to performativity comes from the philosophy of linguistics and builds on Austin's understanding of speech acts as more than statements of existing knowledge, but as creative action in their own right (Searle 1969 ; Austin 2009/1962 ).”
BackgroundForms and functions of SMS messages: A study of variations in a corpus written by adolescents
Bernicot, J., Volckaert‐Legrier, O., Goumi, A., & Bert‐Erboul, A. (2012) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.07.009 · Cited by 79
Blommaert, J. (2015) · AILA Review · doi:10.1075/aila.28.01blo · Cited by 79
Towards a sociology of healthcare safety and quality
Allen, D. A., Braithwaite, J., Sandall, J., & Waring, J. J. (2015) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12390 · Cited by 80
Making a Killing: On Race, Ritual, and (Re)Membering in Digital Culture
Sutherland, T. (2017) · Preservation Digital Technology & Culture · doi:10.1515/pdtc-2017-0025 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Austin, J. L.
- Corresponding author
- Austin, J.L.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 1975-09-18
- Pages
- 177-182
- OpenAlex
- W1576632330
- Cited by
- 21,496
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 432 · 2025: 587 · 2024: 705 · 2023: 823 · 2022: 768 · 2021: 996 · 2020: 1094 · 2019: 1291 · 2018: 1056 · 2017: 881 · 2016: 898 · 2015: 873 · 2014: 960 · 2013: 858 · 2012: 797
- FWCI
- 374.62
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Keywords
- performatives, illocutionary force, statements, speech acts, pragmatics, philosophy of language
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review