The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How To Do Things With Words
Open accessAbstract
This work sets out the author's conclusions in the field to which he directed his main efforts for at least the last ten years of his life. Starting from an examination of his already well-known distinction between performative utterances and statements, he finally abandons that distinction, replacing it with a more general theory of ‘illocutionary forces’ of utterances, which has important bearings on a wide variety of philosophical problems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Bourdieu borrowed from Austin (1975: 16) in emphasizing ' misfires ' or blips, instances in which attempted speech acts (or by extension, attempted practices of any sort) fail because of some maladaption of practice to the situation (Austin's 'infelicities').”
From Bourdieu, Historicity, and Historical Sociology (2011) · cites this paper as Austin, 1975
In the citing paper
“Not knowing these intended meanings or illocutions, in Austin's (1975) words, interlocutors' misunderstanding is inevitable.”
From Teachers’ Classroom Interactional Competence: Scale Development and Validation (2023) · cites this paper as Austin's (1975)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,501–1,600 of 21,466
Arts and owners: Intellectual property law and the politics of scale in Indonesian arts
Aragon, L. V., & Leach, J. (2008) · American Ethnologist · doi:10.1111/j.1548-1425.2008.00101.x · Cited by 73
An Ontology for the Ethnographic Analysis of Social Processes: Extending the Extended-Case Method
Glaeser, A. (2005) · Social Analysis · doi:10.3167/015597705780275138 · Cited by 73
Media dialogical networks and political argumentation
Leudar, I., & Nekvapil, J. (2004) · Journal of Language and Politics · doi:10.1075/jlp.3.2.06leu · Cited by 70
WMD, WMD, WMD: Securitisation through ritualised incantation of ambiguous phrases
Oren, I., & Solomon, T. (2014) · Review of International Studies · doi:10.1017/s0260210514000205 · Cited by 70
Eugenio, B. D., Jordan, P., Thomason, R. H., et al. (2000) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.2000.0428 · Cited by 70
In medias res : communication, existence, and materiality
Cooren, F. (2015) · Communication Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/22041451.2015.1110075 · Cited by 77
Reasoned Moral Agreement: Applying Discourse Ethics within Organizations
Stansbury, J. M. (2009) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.5840/beq20091912 · Cited by 74
Second Language Acquisition of Spoken and Written English: Acquiring the Skeptron
Angélil-Carter, S., & Angélil-Carter, S. (1997) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588047 · Cited by 71
Maternal Control Techniques in a Directed Play Situation
Schaffer, H. R., & Crook, C. K. (1979) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1979.tb02459.x · Cited by 70
Embedding Regression: Models for Context-Specific Description and Inference
RODRIGUEZ, P. L., SPIRLING, A., & STEWART, B. M. (2023) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055422001228 · Cited by 70
Being a Widow and Other Life Stories: The Interplay between Lives and Words
Lamb, S. (2001) · Anthropology & Humanism · doi:10.1525/ahu.2001.26.1.16 · Cited by 69
Dramatic character and ‘human intelligibility’ in Greek tragedy
Gould, J. (1978) · Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society · doi:10.1017/s006867350000403x · Cited by 69
Cynical Assertion: Convention, Pragmatics, and Saying "Uncle"
Kenyon, T. (2003) · American Philosophical Quarterly · Cited by 69
Tutoyer son chef. Entre rapports sociaux et logiques managériales
Alber, A. (2019) · Sociologie du Travail · doi:10.4000/sdt.14517 · Cited by 70
CHAPTER TWO. Secularism and laicism in turkey
Parla, T., & Davison, A. (2008) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822388890-004 · Cited by 69
Politeness in compliment responses
Ruhi, Ş. (2015) · Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) · doi:10.1075/prag.16.1.03ruh · Cited by 79
Learning to use scientific concepts
Wells, G. A. (2008) · Cultural Studies of Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11422-008-9100-6 · Cited by 78
Putting Ordinary Language to Work
Gerring, J., & Barresi, P. A. (2003) · Journal of Theoretical Politics · doi:10.1177/0951629803015002647 · Cited by 71
Simulation, Theory and Content
Heal, J. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615894.006 · Cited by 69
Language use as Social Strategy: A Review and an Analytic Framework for the Social Sciences
Guérin, B. (2003) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.3.251 · Cited by 72
The Use and Effectiveness of Maternal Scaffolding in Mother-Infant Games
Hodapp, R. M., Goldfield, E. C., & Boyatzis, C. J. (1984) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1984.tb03814.x · Cited by 69
Rational Communication in Multi-Agent Environments
Gmytrasiewicz, P. J., & Durfee, E. H. (2001) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1023/a:1011495811107 · Cited by 69
Singh, M. P. (1993) · Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/bf02451549 · Cited by 69
Inferential reconstruction in memory for connected discourse
Spiro, R. J. (1975) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · Cited by 67
Allan, K. (2013) · Perspectives in pragmatics, psychology & philosophy · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-01014-4_11 · Cited by 68
Making Space for the Economy: Live Performances, Dead Objects, and Economic Geography
Barnes, T. J. (2008) · Geography Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00144.x · Cited by 68
“Although apologetic about its ugliness, the Oxford philosopher J. L. Austin (1962) was the first to use the word ‘performativity’ in a systematic philosophical form.”
MethodReformulations of agentless talk in psychotherapy
Kurri, K., & Wahlström, J. (2007) · Text and Talk · doi:10.1515/text.2007.013 · Cited by 67
City senses: On the radical possibilities of pragmatism in geography
Bridge, G. (2007) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.02.004 · Cited by 71
On Grice's circle (a theory-internal problem in linguistic theories of the Gricean type)
Capone, A. (2006) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2006.02.005 · Cited by 68
The “push” of Lautgesetze, the “pull” of enregisterment
Silverstein, M. C. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107449787.003 · Cited by 68
Holmes, W. T. “., & Parker, M. A. (2016) · International Journal of Business Communication · doi:10.1177/2329488416675450 · Cited by 68
The Possibility of Preemptive Forgiving
Cornell, N. (2017) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.1215/00318108-3772018 · Cited by 68
“Austin (1962) never lists “I forgive” as a performative, though he does countenance similar utterances like “I accept your apology ” and “I pardon.””
BackgroundSullivan, S. (2018) · Science & Technology Studies · doi:10.23987/sts.58040 · Cited by 73
“I’m really sorry about what I said”
Su, H., & Wei, N. (2018) · Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) · doi:10.1075/prag.17005.su · Cited by 71
“This paper extends the corpus-linguistic concept of local grammar (Hunston & Sinclair 2000; Barnbrook & Sinclair 2001) to speech act studies (Austin 1962; Searle 1969), focusing specifically on apologising in English.”
BackgroundInfluentialWhat Is the Harm of Hate Speech?
Barendt, E. M. (2019) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-019-10002-0 · Cited by 68
“However, these utterances might have illocutionary force as what he termed a ‘Behabitive’, as being connected with the communication of attitudes and social behaviour (Austin 1975, 151, 160–61).”
BackgroundInfluentialAutomatically Identifying Complaints in Social Media
Preoțiuc-Pietro, D., Găman, M., & Αλέτρας, Ν. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1495 · Cited by 78
“Complaining is considered to be a distinct speech act, as defined by speech act theory (Austin, 1975; Searle, 1969) which is central to the field of pragmatics.”
BackgroundNative speaker saviorism: a racialized teaching ideology
Jenks, C. J., & Lee, J. W. (2019) · Critical Inquiry in Language Studies · doi:10.1080/15427587.2019.1664904 · Cited by 73
Menstrual Taboos: Moving Beyond the Curse
Gottlieb, A. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-0614-7_14 · Cited by 68
Precarious projects: the performative structure of reclamation
Herbert, C. (2015) · Language Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2015.05.002 · Cited by 68
(2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470713099 · Cited by 68
The performativity of the service management discourse
Nordgren, L. (2008) · Journal of Health Organization and Management · doi:10.1108/14777260810898723 · Cited by 70
“In addition, Butler builds her concept on psychoanalytic theory based on Freud and Lacan, linguistic theory, especially speech acts ( Austin, 1962”
BackgroundThe Spectacle and Organization Studies
Flyverbom, M., & Reinecke, J. (2017) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840616685366 · Cited by 66
The selfie as a global discourse
Veum, A., & Undrum, L. V. M. (2017) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926517725979 · Cited by 68
‘Making’, ‘taking’ and the material political economy of algorithmic trading
MacKenzie, D. A. (2018) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085147.2018.1528076 · Cited by 68
Inferring what the student knows in one-to-one tutoring: The role of student questions and answers
Person, N. K., Graesser, A. C., Magliano, J. P., & Kreuz, R. J. (1994) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/1041-6080(94)90010-8 · Cited by 68
Constructing Post-Cold War Collective Security
Frederking, B. (2003) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055403000741 · Cited by 68
Speech act theory in quantitative research on interpersonal behavior∗
D’Andrade, R. G., & Wish, M. (1985) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638538509544615 · Cited by 68
Productive fandom : intermediality and affective reception in fan cultures
Lamerichs, N. (2014) · doi:10.26481/dis.20140326nl · Cited by 67
Teaching Translation from Spanish to English
Beeby, A. (1996) · University of Ottawa Press eBooks · doi:10.26530/oapen_578779 · Cited by 186
Emoticons and Illocutionary Force
Dresner, E., & Herring, S. C. (2013) · Logic, argumentation & reasoning · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7131-4_8 · Cited by 68
Straight talk: conceptions of sincerity in speech
Eriksson, J. R. (2009) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-009-9487-2 · Cited by 67
“9 Austin (1962) , for instance, seems to suggest that different illocutionary acts depend, in some sense, on”
BackgroundNon-observance of Gricean maxims in family dinner table conversation
Brumark, Å. (2005) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2005.03.014 · Cited by 67
The duality of speaker meaning: What makes self-repair, insincerity, and sarcasm possible
Sanders, R. E. (2013) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.020 · Cited by 67
The pragmatics of Akan greetings
Agyekum, K. (2008) · Discourse Studies · doi:10.1177/1461445608091884 · Cited by 67
The Artless Art: Leadership and the Limits of Democratic Rhetoric
Kane, J., & Patapan, H. (2010) · Australian Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1080/10361146.2010.499162 · Cited by 75
Tavárez, D. E. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139342872.024 · Cited by 68
Communicating authoritarian elite cohesion
Schedler, A., & Hoffmann, B. (2015) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2015.1095181 · Cited by 68
News Media's Rhetoric on Facebook
Hågvar, Y. B. (2019) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2019.1577163 · Cited by 81
Studying Projects Processually
Brunet, M., Fachin, F. F., & Langley, A. (2021) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.10.006 · Cited by 80
HEARING, MOTHER FATHER DEAF: Hearing People in Deaf Families
Bishop, M. R., & Hicks, S. L. (2009) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 67
Discursive psychology, rhetoric and the issue of agency
Billig, M. S. (2009) · Semen · doi:10.4000/semen.8930 · Cited by 73
Shihab, I. A. (2011) · Asian Social Science · doi:10.5539/ass.v7n8p209 · Cited by 67
Talia, A., Daniel, S. I. F., Miller‐Bottome, M., Brambilla, D., Miccoli, D., Safran, J. D., & Lingiardi, V. (2013) · Attachment & Human Development · doi:10.1080/14616734.2013.859161 · Cited by 67
Rapport Management during the Exploration Phase of the Salesperson–Customer Relationship
Campbell, K. S., Davis, L. M., & Skinner, L. R. (2006) · Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management · doi:10.2753/pss0885-3134260403 · Cited by 68
Pointing and talk by low-income mothers and their 14-month-old children
Rowe, M. L. (2000) · First Language · doi:10.1177/014272370002006005 · Cited by 68
A pragmatic view on autonomous gestures: A first repertoire of Catalan emblems
Payrató, L. (1993) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/0378-2166(93)90046-r · Cited by 67
Designing Trustworthy Interorganizational Trade Procedures for Open Electronic Commerce
Bons, R. W. H., Lee, R. M., & Wagenaar, R. W. (1998) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.1998.11518316 · Cited by 67
A core ontology for requirements
Jureta, I., Mylopoulos, J., & Faulkner, S. (2009) · Applied Ontology · doi:10.3233/ao-2009-0069 · Cited by 67
The performativity of leadership talk
Simpson, B., Buchan, L., & Sillince, J. A. A. (2017) · Leadership · doi:10.1177/1742715017710591 · Cited by 72
Vicious and Virtuous Circles of Aspirational Talk: From Self-Persuasive to Agonistic CSR Rhetoric
Winkler, P., Etter, M. A., & Castelló, I. (2019) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650319825758 · Cited by 68
“Following Austin (1975), these scholars argue that language not only serves as a medium to describe reality, but that language has performative properties that can trigger consequent action.”
BackgroundPeristeras, V., & Tarabanis, K. A. (2006) · Ibis · Cited by 67
Hage, J. C. (2005) · DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) · doi:10.1007/1-4020-3552-7 · Cited by 67
Enfield, N. J. (2000) · Cultural Dynamics · doi:10.1177/092137400001200102 · Cited by 67
Between semiotics and pragmatics: Opening language studies to textual agency
Cooren, F. (2007) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.018 · Cited by 67
Phillips, W., Gómez, J. C., Baron‐Cohen, S., Laá, V., & Rivière, Á. (1995) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1995.tb01670.x · Cited by 67
On the autonomy of linguistic meaning
Green, M. (1997) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/106.422.217 · Cited by 67
From information management to task management in electronic mail
Takkinen, J. (2002) · DiVA (Linkoping University) · Cited by 67
License to critique: A communication perspective on sustainability standards
Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2017) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.1017/beq.2016.66 · Cited by 66
Howell-Richardson, C., & Mellar, H. (1996) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00156003 · Cited by 141
The Promise: On the Morality of the Marginal and the Illicit
Garcia, A. (2014) · Ethos · doi:10.1111/etho.12038 · Cited by 66
Decentering our analytical position: The dialogicity of things
Caronia, L., & Cooren, F. (2013) · Discourse & Communication · doi:10.1177/1750481313503226 · Cited by 66
Introduction: Beyond Bad Words
Fleming, L., & Lempert, M. P. (2011) · Anthropological Quarterly · doi:10.1353/anq.2011.0008 · Cited by 66
Promises, threats, and the foundations of speech act theory
Salgueiro, A. B. (2015) · Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) · doi:10.1075/prag.20.2.05bla · Cited by 66
The Voice of Authority: The Local Accomplishment of Authoritative Discourse in Live News Broadcasts
Raymond, G. (2000) · Discourse Studies · doi:10.1177/1461445600002003005 · Cited by 66
REVIEW FOCUS: BOUNDARIES IN DISCOURSE ANALYSIS
Wodak, R. (2006) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s004740450606026x · Cited by 83
Local grammars of speech acts: An exploratory study
Su, H. (2017) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2017.02.008 · Cited by 66
Investigating illocutionary monism
Johnson, C. R. (2017) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1508-7 · Cited by 66
Nothing happened, something happened: Silence in a makerspace
de Vaujany, F., & Aroles, J. (2018) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/1350507618811478 · Cited by 67
Sands, K. M. (2008) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822388890-016 · Cited by 64
Nørgaard, N., Busse, B., & Montoro, R. (2010) · Cited by 66
Performing market segmentation: a performative perspective
Venter, P., Wright, A., & Dibb, S. (2014) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2014.980437 · Cited by 66
Casenhiser, D. M., Binns, A. V., McGill, F., Morderer, O., & Shanker, S. G. (2014) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2242-3 · Cited by 66
Actors, resources, activities and commitments
Lenney, P., & Easton, G. (2009) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.12.020 · Cited by 66
“This neglect occurred despite the studies of managerial interactions undertaken by, for example, Boden (1994) and Samra-Fredricks (2000), and the central place of commissives (grammatical moods that indicate promises or threats) in the classical speech act theory of Austin (1962) and Searle (1979 Chapter 1).”
BackgroundThe Organization of Participation and Contingency in Prebeginnings of Request Sequences
Keisanen, T., & Rauniomaa, M. (2012) · Research on Language and Social Interaction · doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.724985 · Cited by 67
Mentor-Novice Conversations about Teaching: A Comparison of Two U.S. and Two Chinese Cases
Wang, J., Strong, M. A., & Odell, S. J. (2004) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00358.x · Cited by 70
Lectura dialógica: interacciones que mejoran y aceleran la lectura
Valls, R., Soler, M., & Flecha, R. (2008) · Revista Iberoamericana de Educación · doi:10.35362/rie460717 · Cited by 66
Denzin, N. K. (2016) · SensePublishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6300-429-9_12 · Cited by 66
Threadgold, T. (2003) · Linguistik Online · doi:10.13092/lo.14.821 · Cited by 66
O’Shaughnessy, N. J., & O‚ÄôShaughnessy, J. (2003) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 66
Metaphor understanding and accessing conceptual schema: Reply to Gibbs (1992).
Glucksberg, S., Keysar, B., & McGlone, M. S. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.99.3.578 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Austin, J. L.
- Corresponding author
- Austin, J.L.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 1975-09-18
- Pages
- 177-182
- OpenAlex
- W1576632330
- Cited by
- 21,496
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 432 · 2025: 587 · 2024: 705 · 2023: 823 · 2022: 768 · 2021: 996 · 2020: 1094 · 2019: 1291 · 2018: 1056 · 2017: 881 · 2016: 898 · 2015: 873 · 2014: 960 · 2013: 858 · 2012: 797
- FWCI
- 374.62
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Keywords
- performatives, illocutionary force, statements, speech acts, pragmatics, philosophy of language
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review