Cited by 444Historical Studies in Latin AmericaMigration, Health, Geopolitics, Historical GeographyAfro-Latin American Studies

National Colors: Racial Classification and the State in Latin America

Loveman, Mara·2014·Oxford University Press eBooks

Abstract

The era of official color-blindness in Latin America has come to an end. For the first time in decades, nearly every state in Latin America now asks their citizens to identify their race or ethnicity on the national census. Most observers highlight the historic novelty of these reforms, but National Colors shows that official racial classification of citizens has a long history in Latin America. Through an analysis of the politics and practice of official ethnoracial classification in the censuses of 19 Latin American states across nearly two centuries, this book explains why most Latin American states classified their citizens by race on early national censuses, why they stopped the practice of official racial classification around midcentury, and why they reintroduced ethnoracial classification on national censuses at the dawn of the 21st century. Beyond domestic political struggles, the analysis reveals that the ways that Latin American states classified their populations from the mid-nineteenth century onward responded to changes in international criteria for how to construct a modern nation and promote national “development.” As prevailing international understandings of what made a political and cultural community a modern nation changed, so too did the ways that Latin American census officials depicted diversity within national populations. The way census officials described populations in official statistics, in turn, shaped how policymakers “saw” national populations and informed their prescriptions for national development–with consequences that still reverberate in contemporary political struggles for recognition, rights, and redress for ethnoracially marginalized populations in today’s Latin America.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199337354.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Definitions of race and ethnic difference are historically situated and fundamentally local such that the meaning and subsequent measurement of racial and ethnic boundaries varies substantially both across regions and within racial and ethnic groups, further complicating comparisons across time and place.

    “Last, definitions of race and ethnic difference are historically situated and fundamentally local such that the meaning (and subsequent measurement) of racial and ethnic boundaries varies substantially both across regions (Loveman 2014) and within racial and ethnic groups (Monk 2021), further complicating comparisons across time and place.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loveman, M.
Corresponding author
Loveman, Mara
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2014-07-07
OpenAlex
W4240214998
Cited by
444
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
20.14
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • OUP Catalogue (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Historical Studies in Latin America
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Migration, Health, Geopolitics, Historical Geography
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Afro-Latin American Studies
Keywords
census history, race and ethnicity, Latin America, national development, nation-building, census statistics, history of race

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review