The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Phenomenal Bonding Solution to the Combination Problem
Open accessAbstract
This chapter identifies certain theses which in conjunction entail the conceptual core of the combination problem: conceptual isolation of subjects, the transparency conceivability principle, and phenomenal transparency. They lead to the following principle: “For any group of subjects, instantiating certain conscious states, it is possible that just subjects with those states exist in the absence of any further subject.” The critic of panpsychism could conclude that lower-level conscious individuals cannot account for higher-level conscious individuals. The chapter claims that this conclusion does not follow because the principle does not rule out the existence of a phenomenal bonding relation at the microlevel. It explores various answers to the question of when and in what conditions subjects become phenomenally bonded and so forth. Having rejected the alternatives, the chapter is prepared to accept unrestricted phenomenal composition: subjects always combine to make further subjects.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Kripke, S. A. (1972) · Semantics of Natural Language · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_9 · Cited by 7,028
Four-Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time
Sider, T. (2001) · doi:10.1093/019924443x.001.0001 · Cited by 1,907
Papineau, D. (2002) · doi:10.1093/0199243824.001.0001 · Cited by 884 · cited 2×
“26 See Papineau 2002.”
Dummett, M. (1978) · Cited by 843
Merricks, T. (2001) · doi:10.1093/0199245363.001.0001 · Cited by 824
Consciousness and its Place in Nature
Chalmers, D. J. (2003) · The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind · doi:10.1002/9780470998762.ch5 · Cited by 574
A PosterioriPhysicalists Get Our Phenomenal Concepts Wrong
Goff, P. (2010) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048401003649617 · Cited by 97
Self-citation(1986)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Roelofs, L. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190859053.001.0001 · Cited by 100
Is the Integrated Information Theory of Consciousness Compatible with Russellian Panpsychism?
Mørch, H. H. (2018) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-018-9995-6 · Cited by 71
Russellian monism and mental causation
Alter, T., & Coleman, S. (2019) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12318 · Cited by 49
Unity Between God and Mind? A Study on the Relationship Between Panpsychism and Pantheism
Leidenhag, J. (2018) · Sophia · doi:10.1007/s11841-018-0688-z · Cited by 35
Deploying Panpsychism for the Demarcation of Panentheism
Leidenhag, J. (2020) · Panentheism and Panpsychism · doi:10.30965/9783957437303_005 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Goff, P.
- Corresponding author
- Goff, Philip
- ORCID
- Goff, Philip
- Venue
- Panpsychism
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2016-12-29
- Pages
- 283-302
- OpenAlex
- W2263072957
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 39.36
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Keywords
- combination problem, panpsychism, phenomenal transparency, consciousness, subjectivity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review