Cited by 235Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationSocial and Intergroup PsychologyPolitical Theory and Democracy

Political Partisanship as a Social Identity

Huddy, Leonie, Bankert, Alexa·2017·Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics

Abstract

Partisanship remains a powerful influence on political behavior within developed and developing democracies, but there remains a lively debate on its nature, origins, and measurement. In this debate, political scientists draw on social identity theory to clarify the nature of partisanship and its political consequences in the United States and other developed and developing democracies. In particular, social identity theory has been used to develop an expressive model of partisanship, which stands in contrast to an instrumental model grounded in ideological and policy considerations. Included here are a discussion of the key motivational and cognitive components of social identity theory and an explanation of how the theory can be applied to the study of partisanship. The focus is on the measurement of partisanship, its social nature, its origins in convergent identities, and its ability to generate strong emotions and drive political engagement. Lastly, areas for future partisanship research are discussed. These areas include the study of negative partisan identities, coalitional identities in multiparty systems, and the political situations in which expressive and instrumental aspects of partisanship are most common.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.250

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Partisanship becomes a source of social segregation, extends beyond policy preferences to influence emotions, acts expressively and non-instrumentally by influencing personal identity, and is a shortcut for building judgments and making decisions.

    “In short, partisanship becomes a source of social segregation, extends beyond policy preferences to influence the field of emotions, acts in an expressive and non-instrumental way by influencing our personal identity and, finally, is a great shortcut for building judgments and making decisions (Huddy & Bankert, 2017;Goldenberg et al., 2023).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huddy, L., & Bankert, A.
Affiliations
Stony Brook University (US)
Venue
Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics
Published
2017-05-24
OpenAlex
W2733714502
Cited by
235
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 4
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
Keywords
partisanship, social identity theory, emotions in politics, political participation, multiparty system, political behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review