Cited by 280Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationPolitical Theory and DemocracyAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics

Polarization: What Everyone Needs to Know®

McCarty, Nolan·2019

Abstract

The 2016 election of Donald J. Trump invoked a time for reflection about the state of American politics and its deep ideological, cultural, racial, regional, and economic divisions. But one aspect that the contemporary discussions often miss is that these fissures have been opening over several decades and are deeply rooted in the structure of American politics and society. Nolan McCarty's Polarization: What Everyone Needs to Know® is an accessible introduction to polarization in America. McCarty takes readers through what scholars know and don't know about the origins, development, and implications of our rising political conflicts, delving into social, economic, and geographic determinants of polarization in the United States. While the current political climate makes it clear that extreme views are becoming more popular, McCarty also argues that, contrary to popular belief, the 2016 election was a natural outgrowth of 40 years of polarized politics, instead of a significant break with the past. He explains the factors that have created this state of affairs, including gerrymandered legislative districts, partisan primary nomination systems, and our private campaign finance system. He also considers the potential of major reforms such as instating proportional representation or single-transferable voting to remedy extreme polarization. A concise overview of a complex and crucial topic in US politics, this book is for anyone wanting to understand how to repair the cracks in…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/wentk/9780190867782.001.0001

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A more polarized legislature advantages defenders of the status quo and can lead to a deteriorating quality of governance that may in turn undermine faith in the constitution.

    “More generally, a more polarized legislature (i.e., one consisting of extremists on all sides) “advantages defenders of the status quo… and can lead to a deteriorating quality of governance [that] may in turn undermine faith in our constitution” (McCarty, 2019, pp.154-155).”

    From How to study democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as McCarty, 2019

  • Issue or ideological polarization is typically operationalized as approaching or arriving at a bimodal distribution of beliefs, opinions and values.

    “This type of polarization is typically operationalized as approaching or arriving at a bimodal distribution of beliefs, opinions and values50,72.”
  • Sometimes multiple lines of potential disagreement in society become highly overlapping, aligned or consolidated, reducing multiple potential cleavages to a single dimension that dominates political relations.

    “Sometimes multiple lines of potential disagreement in society become highly overlapping, aligned or consolidated. In these cases, multiple potential cleavages might be reduced to a single dimension that comes to dominate political relations8,72,77,78.”
  • Historically speaking, polarization in the USA reflects social patterns that began with Southern realignment following civil rights legislation, the rise of single-issue interest groups, changes in campaign finance law, and the withdrawal of moderates from party politics and primary races, especially on the political right.

    “Historically speaking, polarization in the USA reflects social patterns that began with Southern realignment following civil rights legislation, the rise of single-issue interest groups, changes in campaign finance law, and the withdrawal of moderates from party politics and primary races, especially on the political right10,27,31,34,37,72,342,343).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCarty, N.
Corresponding author
McCarty, Nolan
Published
2019-12-05
OpenAlex
W4236619877
Cited by
280
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3
FWCI
21.71
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › American Constitutional Law and Politics
Keywords
political polarization, American politics, 2016 US presidential election, Donald Trump, gerrymandering, campaign finance, proportional representation, electoral reform

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review