Cited by 128Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesTechnology Use by Older AdultsCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Research with older people in a world with COVID-19: identification of current and future priorities, challenges and opportunities

Open access
Richardson, Sarah J, Carroll, Camille B, Close, Jacqueline, Gordon, Adam L, O’Brien, John, Quinn, Terence J, Rochester, Lynn, Sayer, Avan A +4 more·2020·Age and Ageing

Abstract

Older people are disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, which has had a profound impact on research as well as clinical service delivery. This commentary identifies key challenges and opportunities in continuing to conduct research with and for older people, both during and after the current pandemic. It shares opinions from responders to an international survey, a range of academic authors and opinions from specialist societies. Priorities in COVID-19 research include its specific presentation in older people, consequences for physical, cognitive and psychological health, treatments and vaccines, rehabilitation, supporting care homes more effectively, the impact of social distancing, lockdown policies and system reconfiguration to provide best health and social care for older people. COVID-19 research needs to be inclusive, particularly involving older people living with frailty, cognitive impairment or multimorbidity, and those living in care homes. Non-COVID-19 related research for older people remains of critical importance and must not be neglected in the rush to study the pandemic. Profound changes are required in the way that we design and deliver research for older people in a world where movement and face-to-face contact are restricted, but we also highlight new opportunities such as the ability to collaborate more widely and to design and deliver research efficiently at scale and speed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ageing/afaa149

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digital exclusion may result in the exacerbation of existing inequalities where already disadvantaged groups, such as older adults, people with sensory or cognitive impairment, or members of some BAME groups, are at greater risk of exclusion.

    “Digital exclusion may result in the exacerbation of existing inequalities where already disadvantaged groups, such as older adults, people with sensory or cognitive impairment, or members of some BAME groups are at a greater risk of exclusion [1,9,281].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 14 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richardson, S. J., Carroll, C. B., Close, J., Gordon, A. L., O’Brien, J., Quinn, T. J., Rochester, L., Sayer, A. A., Shenkin, S. D., van der Velde, N., Woo, J., & Witham, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Plymouth (GB)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Department of Psychiatry , University of Cambridge and Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Department of Internal Medicine , Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Witham, Miles D
Venue
Age and Ageing
Published
2020-06-25
Volume
49
Issue
6
Pages
901-906
ISSN
  • 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2834
OpenAlex
W3037550717
Cited by
128
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 10
FWCI
25.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Age and Ageing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0617-10109, CL-2019-01-006)
  • British Geriatrics Society
  • NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, older adults, research priorities, research challenges, research design, care homes, social distancing, lockdown, frailty, cognitive impairment, multimorbidity, health and social care, inclusive research, vaccine development, rehabilitation, research collaboration
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Aged, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Pneumonia, Viral, Surveys and Questionnaires, Coronavirus Infections, Biomedical Research, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review