1978 Donanemab in early symptomatic Alzheimer’s Disease: Efficacy and safety in TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2, Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Introduction: In TRAILBLAZER-ALZ donanemab (DONA) cleared brain amyloid plaques, significantly slowing disease progression in early symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease (ESAD). Methods: TRAILBLAZER-ALZ2 enrolled participants with ESAD and amyloid and tau pathology by positron-emission tomography, randomizing (multicenter) those with low/medium-tau (n=1182) and high-tau (n=552) (missing tau n=2). Participants (randomized double-blind,1:1) received DONA (n=860)/placebo (n=876) IV every 4w for 72w. DONA participants meeting amyloid clearance treatment completion criteria at 24/52w had blinded switched to placebo. Primary outcomes: Integrated AD Rating Scale(iADRS) change from baseline at 76w in low/medium-tau or combined (low/medium- and high-tau) populations. Statistical testing allocated most power (80% α spend) to low/medium-tau population outcomes, with the remainder for combined population outcomes, including clinical and biomarker assessments. Results: In the low/medium-tau population iADRS change at 76w: −6.02 (DONA) and −9.27 (placebo) (difference 3.25; 95%CI, 1.88-4.62; P<0.001), 35.1% slowing of disease progression. Change in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR)–Sum of Boxes: 1.20 (DONA) and 1.88 (placebo) (difference −0.67; 95% CI −0.95 to −0.40; P<0.001), 36.0% slowing. Participants receiving DONA experienced 38.6% less risk of progressing to next disease stage vs placebo over 76w (CDR-Global score, HR=0.61; P<0.001). Amyloid clearance at 24/52/76w: achieved in 34.2%/71.3%/80.1% DONA-treated participants. Significant, positive results were observed in the combined population. Serious AEs: 17.4% (DONA), and 15.8% (placebo), with 3 deaths among DONA patients who experienced serious amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA). AEs with DONA included ARIA-E (24.0%, 6.1% symptomatic); ARIA-H (31.4%); infusion-related reactions (8.7%). Conclusion: DONA treatment significantly slowed clinical progression at 76w with a safety profile consistent with earlier studies. Presented: AAIC2023.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Administration of lecanemab manifested significant 27% slower progress in cognitive decline based on the primary endpoint CDR-SB and secondary endpoints.
“The administration of this antibody manifested significant (27%) slower progress in cognitive decline in the patients based on the primary end points, the change from baseline at 19 months in the score on the CDR-SB”
From Current therapeutics for Alzheimer’s disease and clinical trials (2024) · cites this paper as [39]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Current therapeutics for Alzheimer’s disease and clinical trials
Xiao, D., & Zhang, C. (2024) · Exploration of Neuroscience · doi:10.37349/en.2024.00048 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
CSF neurofilament light chain profiling and quantitation in neurological diseases
Leckey, C. A., Coulton, J. B., Giovannucci, T. A., He, Y., Aslanyan, A., Laban, R., Heslegrave, A., Doykov, I., Ammoscato, F., Chataway, J., et al. (2024) · Brain Communications · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcae132 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Wang, X., Zhou, L., Liu, Y., Ban, F., Yang, Z., Zhang, Y., Hu, X., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Chemistry & Biodiversity · doi:10.1002/cbdv.202401809 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“In recent years, some A β monoclone antibodies, like lecanemab [8] and donanemab [9], have been approved as clinical A β cleaners; however, they can cause cardiovascular and gastrointestinal side effects.”
Lv, S., Kuang, J.-Y., Wang, T.-W., Zhang, L.-P., Liu, J., Wang, W., Yang, M.-F., Ni, Q., Sun, B.-L., & Sun, J.-Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2026.1648591 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Although recent anti-amyloid immunotherapies such as lecanemab have shown modest clinical bene fi t (5, 6), their limited effect sizes and restricted eligibility criteria underscore the need to explore non-amyloid pathogenic mechanisms (7).”
Li, E., Zhang, P., & Feng, W. (2026) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2026.1783786 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
What might melatonin supplementation provide for humans beyond improved onset to sleep?
Shea, L. A. (2024) · Exploration of neuroscience · doi:10.37349/en.2024.00066
Wang, T., Wang, L., Cao, J., Zhao, Y., He, Z., & Lu, F. (2026) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2026.1956600
- Authors
- Mintun, M., Ritchie, C., Solomon, P., Sims, J. R., Salloway, S., Hansson, O., Apostolova, L. G., Zimmer, J. A., Evans, C. D., Lu, M., Ardayfio, P., Sparks, J. D., Wessels, A. M., Shcherbinin, S., Wang, H., Nery, E. S. M., Collins, E. C., Dennehy, E. B., Brooks, D. A., Skovronsky, D. M., TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 Investigators, & Farquharson (Non-author presenter), A.
- Affiliations
- Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
- Scottish Brain Sciences , UK
- Boston University (US)
- Brown University (US)
- Lund University (SE)
- Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
- Eli Lilly and Company , USA
- ORCID
- Venue
- Age and Ageing
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2024-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- Supplement_1
- ISSN
- 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2834
- OpenAlex
- W4391224832
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 2.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Age and Ageing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Keywords
- donanemab, amyloid plaques, tau pathology, amyloid clearance, disease progression, Clinical Dementia Rating, treatment safety, anti-amyloid therapy, biomarkers, cognitive decline, treatment discontinuation, serious adverse events
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review