Cited by 399Pain Management and Placebo EffectMigraine and Headache StudiesAcupuncture Treatment Research Studies

Altered Placebo and Drug Labeling Changes the Outcome of Episodic Migraine Attacks

Open access
Kam-Hansen, Slavenka, Jakubowski, Moshe, Kelley, John M., Kirsch, Irving, Hoaglin, David C., Kaptchuk, Ted J., Burstein, Rami·2014·Science Translational Medicine

Abstract

In 459 migraine attacks, information provided to patients (from negative to neutral to positive) modified placebo and medication outcomes in a progressive fashion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006175

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In medical care, placebo and nocebo effects can affect how well a treatment works.

    “In a clinical setting, it has been demonstrated that either or both placebo (positive expectancy of pain relief) and nocebo effects (negative expectancy of increased pain) influence the effectiveness of medical treatment (Kam-Hansen et al., 2014; Pollo et al., 2001).”

    From Distinct neural representations of placebo and nocebo effects (2015) · cites this paper as Kam-Hansen et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kam-Hansen, S., Jakubowski, M., Kelley, J. M., Kirsch, I., Hoaglin, D. C., Kaptchuk, T. J., & Burstein, R.
Affiliations
  • Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • IC Independent Consulting (Australia) (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Kaptchuk, Ted J.
  • Burstein, Rami
Venue
Science Translational Medicine
Published
2014-01-08
Volume
6
Issue
218
Pages
218ra5-218ra5
ISSN
  • 1946-6234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-6242
OpenAlex
W2169836118
Cited by
399
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 29
FWCI
22.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science Translational Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS069847, R37NS079678)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (K24AT004095)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
Keywords
episodic migraine, placebo effect, drug labeling, rizatriptan, patient information, analgesia
MeSH terms
Drug Labeling, Humans, Migraine Disorders, Pain Measurement, Placebos, Triazoles, Tryptamines, Treatment Outcome, Endpoint Determination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review