Cited by 289Frailty in Older AdultsAging, Health, and DisabilityChronic Disease Management Strategies

The Predictive Validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator: Disability, Health Care Utilization, and Quality of Life in a Population at Risk

Open access
Gobbens, R. J. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., Luijkx, K. G., Schols, J. M. G. A.·2012·The Gerontologist

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the predictive validity of frailty and its domains (physical, psychological, and social), as measured by the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), for the adverse outcomes disability, health care utilization, and quality of life. DESIGN AND METHODS: The predictive validity of the TFI was tested in a representative sample of 484 community-dwelling persons aged 75 years and older in 2008 (response rate 42%). A subset of all respondents participated 1 year later (N = 336, 69%) and again 2 years later (N = 266, 55%). We used the TFI, the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale assessing disability, seven indicators of health care utilization, and a brief version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF). The WHOQOL-BREF was assessed in 2008 and 2010; all others were assessed in 2008, 2009, and 2010. RESULTS: The predictive validity of the TFI assessed in 2008 for disability, health care utilization, and quality of life was corroborated by (a) medium to very large associations of frailty with adverse outcomes 1 or 2 years later; (b) mostly good to excellent area under the curve of total frailty; and (c) an increase in predictive accuracy of most adverse outcomes, even after controlling for that same adverse outcome in 2008, and life-course determinants and multimorbidity. Physical frailty was mostly responsible for the predictive validity of the TFI. IMPLICATIONS: This study showed that the TFI is a valid instrument to predict disability, many indicators of health care utilization, and quality of life of older people, 1 and 2 years later.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/gnr135

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Groningen Frailty Indicator and Tilburg Frailty Indicator are simple and similar questionnaire-based approaches to detecting frailty.

    “The Groningen Frailty Indicator (102) and the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (103) are simple and similar (104) questionnaire based approaches to detecting people with frailty.”

    From Frailty in elderly people (2013) · cites this paper as [104]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gobbens, R. J. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., Luijkx, K. G., & Schols, J. M. G. A.
Affiliations
Tilburg University (NL)
Corresponding author
Gobbens, R. J. J.
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
2012-01-04
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
619-631
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W2158875429
Cited by
289
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
Tilburg Frailty Indicator, frailty, predictive validity, disability, health care utilization, quality of life, older adults, physical frailty, psychological frailty, social frailty, community-dwelling older adults, multimorbidity
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Disability Evaluation, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Health Services, Humans, Male, Netherlands, Predictive Value of Tests, Primary Health Care, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Risk, Socioeconomic Factors, World Health Organization, Reproducibility of Results, Geriatric Assessment, Frail Elderly, Vulnerable Populations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review