Cited by 71Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyNutrition, Genetics, and DiseaseGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

A genome-wide linkage scan for dietary energy and nutrient intakes: the Health, Risk Factors, Exercise Training, and Genetics (HERITAGE) Family Study.

Open access
Collaku, Agron, Rankinen, Tuomo, Rice, Treva, Leon, Arthur S, Rao, DC, Skinner, James S, Wilmore, Jack H, Bouchard, Claude·2004·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background A poor diet is a risk factor for chronic diseases such as obesity, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and some cancers. Twin and family studies suggest that genetic factors potentially influence energy and nutrient intakes.Objective We sought to identify genomic regions harboring genes affecting total energy, carbohydrate, protein, and fat intakes.Design We performed a genomic scan in 347 white sibling pairs and 99 black sibling pairs. Dietary energy and nutrient intakes were assessed by using Willett's food-frequency questionnaire. Single-point and multipoint Haseman-Elston regression techniques were used to test for linkage. These subjects were part of the Health, Risk Factors, Exercise Training, and Genetics (HERITAGE) Family Study, a multicenter project undertaken by 5 laboratories.Results In the whites, the strongest evidence of linkage appeared for dietary energy and nutrient intakes on chromosomes 1p21.2 (P = 0.0002) and 20q13.13 (P = 0.00007), and that for fat intake appeared on chromosome 12q14.1 (P = 0.0013). The linkage evidence on chromosomes 1 and 20 related to total energy intake rather than to the intake of specific macronutrients. In the blacks, promising linkages for macronutrient intakes occurred on chromosomes 12q23-q24.21, 1q32.1, and 7q11.1. Several potential candidate genes are encoded in and around the linkage regions on chromosomes 1p21.2, 12q14.1, and 20q13.13.Conclusions These are the first reported human quantitative trait loci for dietary energy and macronutrient intakes. Further study may refine these quantitative trait loci to identify potential candidate genes for energy and specific macronutrient intakes that would be amenable to more detailed molecular studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/79.5.881

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genetic factors may explain a modest share of individual differences in sweet product consumption.

    “Evidence exists that genetic factors could account for a modest portion of individual differences in the consumption of sweet products (83).”

    From Sweetness and Food Preference (2012) · cites this paper as [83]

    The Results and Discussion report promising genetic linkages for sucrose intake in Black participants, supporting a possible genetic contribution. The study measured sucrose intake rather than consumption of sweet products, and the cited passages do not estimate what share of individual differences genetics explains. Our copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]20. SAGE. Statistical analysis for genetic epidemiology. Cork, Ireland: Sta- tistical Solutions Ltd, 2002.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Collaku, A., Rankinen, T., Rice, T., Leon, A. S., Rao, D., Skinner, J. S., Wilmore, J. H., & Bouchard, C.
Affiliations
Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Bouchard, Claude
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
79
Issue
5
Pages
881-886
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1920278388
Cited by
71
References
32
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL047327, HL 47321, HL 45670, HL47323, R01HL047317, HL 47327, R01HL047323, HL47317, R01HL045670, R01HL047321)
  • National Center for Research Resources (1P41-RR03655, RR-03655, P41 RR 03655, P41RR003655, 1P41 RR -3655)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
energy intake, macronutrient intake, dietary fat intake, carbohydrate intake, protein intake, genetic linkage, quantitative trait loci, sibling pairs, HERITAGE Family Study, candidate genes, racial differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Energy Intake, Chromosome Mapping, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 12, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 20, Diet, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Dietary Proteins, Female, Humans, Genetic Linkage, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Exercise, Genome, Human, Quantitative Trait, Heritable, Black People, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review