Cited by 125Body Composition Measurement TechniquesThermoregulation and physiological responsesNutrition and Health in Aging

Water balance, hydration status, and fat-free mass hydration in younger and older adults

Open access
Bossingham, Mandi J, Carnell, Nadine S, Campbell, Wayne W·2005·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background Older adults are at increased risk of dehydration, yet water balance is understudied in this population. Objective This controlled diet study assessed the effect of age on water input, output, and balance in healthy adults. Hydration status (plasma osmolality and urine specific gravity) and body composition were also measured. Design Eleven men and 14 women aged 23-46 y and 10 men and 11 women aged 63-81 y were subjects. Water balance was assessed during days 7-10 of three 18-d controlled feeding trials with protein intakes of 0.50, 0.75, and 1.00 g . kg(-1) . d(-1). Total water input included water from the provided foods and beverages, ad libitum intake, and metabolic production. Water output included the losses in urine and stool and the insensible losses from respiration and nonsweating perspiration. Results Ad libitum water consumption, total water intake, water output through urine, total water output, and net water balance were not different in the older subjects than in the younger subjects. Markers of hydration status were within the range of clinical normalcy for all groups. Total body water (TBW) was not significantly different, fat-free mass (FFM) was significantly lower (P Conclusions These results show that healthy older adults maintain water input, output, and balance comparable to those of younger adults and have no apparent changes in hydration status. The results support that the hydration of FFM is increased in older men and women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/81.6.1342

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bossingham, M. J., Carnell, N. S., & Campbell, W. W.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Campbell, Wayne W
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-06
Volume
81
Issue
6
Pages
1342-1350
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2147847258
Cited by
125
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01 AG 15750, R01AG015750)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01 RR 14288, M01RR014288)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
water balance, hydration status, older adults, aging, dehydration, plasma osmolality, urine specific gravity, total body water, body composition, protein intake, water intake
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Body Composition, Body Water, Dietary Proteins, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drinking, Feces, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Water-Electrolyte Balance, Urinalysis, Muscle, Skeletal, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review