Cited by 24Iron Metabolism and DisordersNutrition and Health StudiesTrace Elements in Health

Iron supplement use and iron status among US adults: results from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Open access
Blanck, Heidi Michels, Cogswell, Mary E, Gillespie, Cathleen, Reyes, Michele·2005·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background Patients with hemochromatosis are instructed to avoid taking supplemental iron. Whether supplemental iron intakes lead to higher iron status among healthy persons remains less clear.Objective The objective was to ascertain whether supplemental iron intakes are associated with increases in iron transport (transferrin saturation) and stores (serum ferritin) among US adults aged > or = 19 y.Design We analyzed data for 5948 adults from whom a fasting serum sample was collected during the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. We used multivariable linear regression and analysis of variance to assess the association of supplemental iron intake with iron transport and stores among men (aged 19-30 y or > 30 y) and women (nonpregnant premenopausal or postmenopausal); multiple comparison tests were also performed.Results Healthy adults who took supplements containing average daily amounts of iron at < or = 3 times the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) did not have significantly higher iron transport or stores than did those who did not take supplements. In younger men, the intake of > 32 mg Fe/d (> 4x RDA) was associated with mean transport iron concentrations that were significantly higher than those in persons who took 0 to < or = 24 mg Fe/d. In older men, the intake of > 32 mg Fe/d (> 4x RDA) was associated with mean iron stores that were significantly higher than those in persons who took 0 to < or = 24 mg Fe/d; a similar result was observed in postmenopausal women, but it was of borderline statistical significance.Conclusion Supplement users should be made aware of the amount of iron necessary to satisfy dietary requirements and informed of the possible influence that excess iron intake can have on body iron stores and health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/82.5.1024

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High iron intake from supplements or fortified products is known to be toxic, has been linked to negative health effects such as adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes, and may be particularly harmful for some genetically susceptible people.

    “very high iron intake in supplemental or forti fi ed forms is known to be toxic and has been associated with negative health impacts, including adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes, and could be especially harmful for certain genetically susceptible individuals (42, 45).”
  • In both groups, average iron intake from cereals and supplements across pregnancy exceeded the Tolerable Upper Intake Limit for iron, yet matched national supplement-intake estimates for pregnant women (48 mg/day) and women of childbearing age (18 mg/day).

    “Average iron intake from cereals and supplements throughout pregnancy for both groups in this study was above the Tolerable Upper Intake Limit for iron (40) but was in line with national estimates of intake from supplements for pregnant women (48 mg/day) (41) and women of childbearing age (18 mg/day) (42).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Barton JC, McDonnell SM, Adams PC, et al. Management of hemo- chromatosis. Ann Intern Med 1998;129:932-9.
  2. National Center for Health Statistics. Plan and operation of the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988 -94. Vital Health Stat 1 1994;32:1-407.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blanck, H. M., Cogswell, M. E., Gillespie, C., & Reyes, M.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Blanck, Heidi Michels
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-11
Volume
82
Issue
5
Pages
1024-1031
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132855548
Cited by
24
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Trace Elements in Health
Keywords
iron supplementation, iron status, serum ferritin, transferrin saturation, iron stores, iron intake, hemochromatosis, RDA, sex differences, age differences, healthy adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Ferritins, Humans, Iron, Male, Menopause, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Nutritional Requirements, Sex Factors, Transferrin, United States, Linear Models, Nutrition Policy, Iron, Dietary, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review