The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risk assessment for vitamin D
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vitamin D for health: a global perspective
Hossein-nezhad, A., & Holick, M. F. (2013) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.05.011 · Cited by 1,298
Marine n−3 Fatty Acids and Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer
Manson, J. E., Cook, N. R., Lee, I.-M., Christen, W., Bassuk, S. S., Mora, S., Gibson, H., Albert, C. M., Gordon, D., Copeland, T., et al. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1811403 · Cited by 979
Jorde, R., Sneve, M., Figenschau, Y., Svartberg, J., & Waterloo, K. (2008) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2796.2008.02008.x · Cited by 433
Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy
Palacios, C., Kostiuk, L. K., & Peña-Rosas, J. P. (2019) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008873.pub4 · Cited by 377
Mohr, S. B., Garland, C. F., Gorham, E. D., & Garland, F. C. (2008) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-008-1061-5 · Cited by 330
Metadata
- Authors
- Hathcock, J. N., Shao, A., Vieth, R., & Heaney, R.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6-18
- ISSN
- 0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1911104948
- Cited by
- 886
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 56.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk assessment for vitamin D. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ajcn/85.1.6
- The paper
- Hathcock, J. N., Shao, A., Vieth, R., & Heaney, R. (2007). Risk assessment for vitamin D. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/85.1.6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.