The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prebiotic evaluation of a novel galactooligosaccharide mixture produced by the enzymatic activity of Bifidobacterium bifidum NCIMB 41171, in healthy humans: a randomized, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled intervention study
Open accessAbstract
Background Galactooligosaccharides are selectively fermented by the beneficial member of the colonic microflora contributing to the health of the host.Objective We assessed the prebiotic potential of a novel galactooligosaccharide produced through the action of beta-galactosidases, originating from a probiotic Bifidobacterium bifidum strain, against a galactooligosaccharide produced through the action of an industrial beta-galactosidase and a placebo.Design Fifty-nine healthy human volunteers participated in this study. Initially, the effect of the matrix on the prebiotic properties of a commercially available galactooligosaccharide (7 g/d) was assessed during 7-d treatment periods with a 7-d washout period in between. During the second phase, 30 volunteers were assigned to a sequence of treatments (7 d) differing in the amount of the novel galactooligosaccharide (0, 3.6, or 7 g/d). Stools were recovered before and after each intervention, and bacteria numbers were determined by fluorescent in situ hybridization.Results Addition of the novel galactooligosaccharide mixture significantly increased the bifidobacterial population ratio compared with the placebo (P < 0.05), whereas 7 g/d of the novel galactooligosaccharide significantly increased the bifidobacterial ratio compared with the commercial galactooligosaccharide (P < 0.05). Moreover, a significant relation (P < 0.001) between the bifidobacteria proportion and the novel galactooligosaccharide dose (0, 3.6, and 7 g/d) was observed. This relation was similar to the effect of the novel galactooligosaccharide on the prebiotic index of each dose.Conclusions This study showed that galactooligosaccharide mixtures produced with different beta-galactosidases show different prebiotic properties and that, by using enzymes originating from bifidobacterial species, an increase in the bifidogenic properties of the prebiotic product is achievable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although not tested with GLP-1RAs, GOS consistently increases Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, while reducing potentially pathogenic bacteria such as Bacteroides spp., Clostridium perfringens, Escherichia coli, Prevotella, and Gardnerella [135-138]”
From Nutritional Approaches to Enhance GLP-1 Analogue Therapy in Obesity: A Narrative Review (2025) · cites this paper as [138]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dietary Modulation of the Human Colonic Microbiota: Introducing the Concept of Prebiotics
Gibson, G. R., & Roberfroid, M. B. (1995) · Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/125.6.1401 · Cited by 7,659
Self-citationAFRC, R. F. (1989) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1989.tb05105.x · Cited by 4,831
Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: updating the concept of prebiotics
Gibson, G. R., Probert, H. M., Loo, J. V., Rastall, R. A., & Roberfroid, M. B. (2004) · Nutrition Research Reviews · doi:10.1079/nrr200479 · Cited by 2,539
Self-citationPrebiotics: The Concept Revisited1,
Roberfroid, M. (2007) · Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/137.3.830s · Cited by 1,502
Manz, W., Amann, R., Ludwig, W., Vancanneyt, M., & SCHLEIFER, K. H. (1996) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/13500872-142-5-1097 · Cited by 1,176
Franks, A. H., Harmsen, H. J. M., Raangs, G. C., Jansen, G. J., Schut, F., & Welling, G. W. (1998) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.64.9.3336-3345.1998 · Cited by 1,056
Langendijk-Genevaux, P. S., Schut, F., Jansen, G. J., Raangs, G. C., Kamphuis, G. R., Wilkinson, M. H. F., & Welling, G. W. (1995) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.61.8.3069-3075.1995 · Cited by 974
A comparative in vitro evaluation of the fermentation properties of prebiotic oligosaccharides
Rycroft, C. E., Jones, M. R., Gibson, G. R., & Rastall, R. A. (2001) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01446.x · Cited by 653
Self-citationSatokari, R. M., Vaughan, E. E., Akkermans, A. D. L., Saarela, M., & de Vos, W. M. (2001) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.67.2.504-513.2001 · Cited by 444
Bouhnik, Y., Raskine, L., Simoneau, G., Vicaut, É., Neut, C., Flourié, B., Brouns, F. J. P. H., & Bornet, F. R. J. (2004) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/80.6.1658 · Cited by 412
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gibson, G. R., Hutkins, R., Sanders, M. E., Prescott, S. L., Reimer, R. A., Salminen, S. J., Scott, K., Stanton, C., Swanson, K. S., Cani, P. D., et al. (2017) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2017.75 · Cited by 5,634
Self-citationPrebiotic effects: metabolic and health benefits
Roberfroid, M. B., Gibson, G. R., Hoyles, L., McCartney, A. L., Rastall, R. A., Rowland, I. R., Wolvers, D. A. W., Watzl, B., Szajewska, H., Stahl, B., et al. (2010) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114510003363 · Cited by 2,170
Self-citationCarbohydrate metabolism in Bifidobacteria
Pokusaeva, K., Fitzgerald, G. F., & van Sinderen, D. (2011) · Genes & Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s12263-010-0206-6 · Cited by 890
Dietary prebiotics: current status and new definition
Gibson, G. R., Scott, K. P., Rastall, R. A., Tuohy, K. M., Hotchkiss, A. T., Dubert‐Ferrandon, A., Gareau, M. G., Murphy, E. F., Saulnier, D. M. A., Loh, G., et al. (2010) · Food Science & Technology Bulletin Functional Foods · doi:10.1616/1476-2137.15880 · Cited by 820
Self-citationSo, D., Whelan, K., Rossi, M., Morrison, M., Holtmann, G., Kelly, J. T., Shanahan, E. R., Staudacher, H. M., & Campbell, K. L. (2018) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqy041 · Cited by 683
Metadata
- Authors
- Depeint, F., Tzortzis, G., Vulevic, J., I'Anson, K., & Gibson, G. R.
- Affiliations
- Quadram Institute (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Tzortzis, George
- Venue
- The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 785-791
- ISSN
- 0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2153503726
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 17.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
- Keywords
- galactooligosaccharides, prebiotics, Bifidobacterium bifidum, beta-galactosidase, bifidogenic effect, Bifidobacterium, colonic microbiota, prebiotic index, dose-response relationship
- MeSH terms
- Adult, beta-Galactosidase, Bifidobacterium, Colon, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Feces, Female, Fermentation, Galactose, Humans, Male, Oligosaccharides, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Cross-Over Studies, Probiotics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review