Cited by 749Cystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes

Predictive 5-year survivorship model of cystic fibrosis

Open access
Liou, Theodore G., Adler, Frederick R., FitzSimmons, Stacey C., Cahill, Barbara C., Hibbs, Jonathan R., Marshall, Bruce C.·2001·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

The objective of this study was to create a 5-year survivorship model to identify key clinical features of cystic fibrosis. Such a model could help researchers and clinicians to evaluate therapies, improve the design of prospective studies, monitor practice patterns, counsel individual patients, and determine the best candidates for lung transplantation. The authors used information from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR), which has collected longitudinal data on approximately 90% of cystic fibrosis patients diagnosed in the United States since 1986. They developed multivariate logistic regression models by using data on 5,820 patients randomly selected from 11,630 in the CFFPR in 1993. Models were tested for goodness of fit and were validated for the remaining 5,810 patients for 1993. The validated 5-year survivorship model included age, forced expiratory volume in 1 second as a percentage of predicted normal, gender, weight-for-age z score, pancreatic sufficiency, diabetes mellitus, Staphylococcus aureus infection, Burkerholderia cepacia infection, and annual number of acute pulmonary exacerbations. The model provides insights into the complex nature of cystic fibrosis and supplies a rigorous tool for clinical practice and research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/153.4.345

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liou, T. G., Adler, F. R., FitzSimmons, S. C., Cahill, B. C., Hibbs, J. R., & Marshall, B. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (US)
  • New York State Department of Health (US)
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2001-02-15
Volume
153
Issue
4
Pages
345-352
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2144947606
Cited by
749
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 31
FWCI
15.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
  • University of Utah
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K08HL003656)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Keywords
cystic fibrosis, five-year survival, prognostic model, FEV1, pancreatic sufficiency, diabetes mellitus, Staphylococcus aureus infection, pulmonary exacerbations, weight-for-age z-score, lung transplantation candidates, patient counseling
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Bacterial Infections, Body Weight, Child, Child, Preschool, Cystic Fibrosis, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreatic Diseases, Predictive Value of Tests, Sex Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review