Cited by 405Race, Genetics, and SocietyRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Commentary: Considerations for Use of Racial/Ethnic Classification in Etiologic Research

Kaufman, J. S.·2001·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Numerous authors have critiqued the use of race as an etiologic quantity in medical research. Despite this criticism, the use of variables encoding racial/ethnic categorization has increased in epidemiology, and most researchers agree that important variation in disease risk is captured by this classification system. Previous discussions have generally neglected to articulate guidelines for appropriate use of racial/ethnic information in etiologic research. The authors summarize the logical, conceptual, and practical problems associated with the "ethnic paradigm" as currently applied in biomedical sciences and offer a set of methodological recommendations toward more valid use of racial/ethnic classification in etiologic studies. These suggested guidelines address issues of variable definition, study design, and covariate control, providing a consistent foundation for etiologic research programs that neither ignore racial/ethnic disease disparities nor obfuscate the nature of these disparities through inappropriate analytical approaches. This methodological analysis of racial/ethnic classification as an epidemiologic quantity provides a formal basis for a focus on racism (i.e., social relations) rather than race (i.e., innate biologic predisposition) in the interpretation of racial/ethnic "effects."

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/154.4.291

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Epidemiological and public health researchers have increasingly shifted their practices towards the study of social determinants of health, and in particular, the multiple ways racism affects health outcomes.

    “Epidemiological and public health researchers have increasingly shifted their practices towards the study of social determinants of health, and in particular, the multiple ways racism affects health outcomes [41, 61, 71, 117, 119, 120].”

    From Towards a critical race methodology in algorithmic fairness (2020) · cites this paper as [61]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaufman, J. S.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Kaufman, J. S.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2001-08-15
Volume
154
Issue
4
Pages
291-298
ISSN
0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107768525
Cited by
405
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01 HD-39746, R01HD039746)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
racial disparities, racism, social determinants of health, variable definitions, research design, covariate control, methodological recommendations, disease risk
MeSH terms
Epidemiologic Methods, Ethnicity, Humans, Epidemiologic Research Design, Causality, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Guidelines as Topic, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review