Cited by 246Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchPublic Health Policies and EducationRace, History, and American Society

Black Lives Matter: A Commentary on Racism and Public Health

Open access
Jee-Lyn García, Jennifer, Sharif, Mienah Zulfacar·2015·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

The recent nonindictments of police officers who killed unarmed Black men have incited popular and scholarly discussions on racial injustices in our legal system, racialized police violence, and police (mis)conduct. What is glaringly absent is a public health perspective in response to these events. We aim to fill this gap and expand the current dialogue beyond these isolated incidents to a broader discussion of racism in America and how it affects the health and well-being of people of color. Our goal is not only to reiterate how salient structural racism is in our society, but how critical antiracist work is to the core goals and values of public health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2015.302706

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • While earlier studies of the social determinants of health tend to center individual and interpersonal racialized experiences, this new paradigm shifts focus to the institutional and structural conditions that shape racial disparities in health.

    “While earlier studies of the social determinants of health tend to center individual and interpersonal racialized experiences, this new paradigm shifts focus to the institutional and structural conditions that shape racial disparities in health [44, 45, 110, 118].”

    From Towards a critical race methodology in algorithmic fairness (2020) · cites this paper as [44]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jee-Lyn García, J., & Sharif, M. Z.
Affiliations
  • Jennifer Jee-Lyn García is with the Department of Health Sciences, California State University, Dominguez Hills. Mienah Zulfacar Sharif is with the Department of Community Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles.
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2015-08
Volume
105
Issue
8
Pages
e27-e30
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W1947438632
Cited by
246
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
77.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (T32AG033533)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD041022)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
Keywords
Black Lives Matter, racism, structural racism, public health, anti-racism, police brutality, police misconduct, racial injustice, health disparities, people of color
MeSH terms
Black or African American, Humans, Public Health, United States, Police, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review