Cited by 212Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis

HLA-DR15 Haplotype and Multiple Sclerosis: A HuGE Review

Schmidt, Hollie, Williamson, Dhelia, Ashley-Koch, Allison·2007·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

An association between multiple sclerosis (MS) and the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) complex, a dense cluster of genes on the short arm of chromosome 6, was first noted over 30 years ago. In Caucasian populations of Northern European descent, the DR15 haplotype (DRB1*1501-DQA1*0102-DQB1*0602) has been hypothesized to be the primary HLA genetic susceptibility factor for MS. However, studies of other populations have produced varying results. Thus, the authors reviewed the literature for articles on the association between the DR15 haplotype and MS. They identified 72 papers meeting the inclusion criteria: human genetic studies written in English that were published between 1993 and 2004 and that reported allele frequencies for HLA-DRB1*1501, HLA-DQA1*0102, or HLA-DQB1*0602 or the frequency of the DRB1*1501-DQA1*0102-DQB1*0602 haplotype. Most of the studies identified used a case-control design (n = 60), while the remainder used a family-based design (n = 22). In most of these papers, investigators reported a higher frequency of the DR15 haplotype and/or its component alleles among MS cases than among controls. However, the authors' confidence in these results is tempered by factors related to study design that may have biased the outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwk118

Cites

144 of 144 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 146 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmidt, H., Williamson, D., & Ashley-Koch, A.
Affiliations
  • Accelerated Cure Project for Multiple Sclerosis (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2007-02-28
Volume
165
Issue
10
Pages
1097-1109
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2146798707
Cited by
212
References
146
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, HLA-DRB1*1501, HLA-DQA1*0102, HLA-DQB1*0602, genetic susceptibility, HLA complex, allele frequency, case-control study, family-based association study, study design bias
MeSH terms
Alleles, Multigene Family, Haplotypes, HLA-D Antigens, Humans, Multiple Sclerosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review