Cited by 1,258COVID-19 epidemiological studiesInfluenza Virus Research StudiesCOVID-19 Prevention and Impact

Impact assessment of non-pharmaceutical interventions against coronavirus disease 2019 and influenza in Hong Kong: an observational study

Open access
Cowling, Benjamin J, Ali, Sheikh Taslim, Ng, Tiffany W Y, Tsang, Tim K, Li, Julian C M, Fong, Min Whui, Liao, Qiuyan, Kwan, Mike YW +5 more·2020·The Lancet Public Health

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background A range of public health measures have been implemented to suppress local transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Hong Kong. We examined the effect of these interventions and behavioural changes of the public on the incidence of COVID-19, as well as on influenza virus infections, which might share some aspects of transmission dynamics with COVID-19. Methods We analysed data on laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases, influenza surveillance data in outpatients of all ages, and influenza hospitalisations in children. We estimated the daily effective reproduction number ( R t ) for COVID-19 and influenza A H1N1 to estimate changes in transmissibility over time. Attitudes towards COVID-19 and changes in population behaviours were reviewed through three telephone surveys done on Jan 20–23, Feb 11–14, and March 10–13, 2020. Findings COVID-19 transmissibility measured by R t has remained at approximately 1 for 8 weeks in Hong Kong. Influenza transmission declined substantially after the implementation of social distancing measures and changes in population behaviours in late January, with a 44% (95% CI 34–53%) reduction in transmissibility in the community, from an estimated R t of 1·28 (95% CI 1·26–1·30) before the start of the school closures to 0·72 (0·70–0·74) during the closure weeks. Similarly, a 33% (24–43%) reduction in transmissibility was seen based on paediatric hospitalisation rates, from an R t of 1·10 (1·06–1·12) before the start of the school closures to 0·73 (0·68–0·77) after school closures. Among respondents to the surveys, 74·5%, 97·5%, and 98·8% reported wearing masks when going out, and 61·3%, 90·2%, and 85·1% reported avoiding crowded places in surveys 1 (n=1008), 2 (n=1000), and 3 (n=1005), respectively. Interpretation Our study shows that non-pharmaceutical interventions (including border restrictions, quarantine and isolation, distancing, and changes in population behaviour) were associated with reduced transmission of COVID-19 in Hong Kong, and are also likely to have substantially reduced influenza transmission in early February, 2020. Funding Health and Medical Research Fund, Hong Kong.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2468-2667(20)30090-6

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is unclear whether observed patterns in infectious and maternal deaths reflected true reductions in infectious disease burden or changes in death attributions associated with lockdown-related disruptions to MCCD functions.

    “making it unclear whether observed patterns reflected true reductions in infectious disease burden, as reported in other settings41–45, or changes in death attributions associated with lockdown-related disruptions to MCCD functions.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cowling, B. J., Ali, S. T., Ng, T. W. Y., Tsang, T. K., Li, J. C. M., Fong, M. W., Liao, Q., Kwan, M. Y., Lee, S. L., Chiu, S. S., Wu, J. T., Wu, P., & Leung, G. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Queen Mary Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Wu, Peng
Venue
The Lancet Public Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
e279-e288
ISSN
2468-2667 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3017190864
Cited by
1,258
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 103 · 2023: 149 · 2022: 223 · 2021: 392 · 2020: 305
FWCI
42.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Sanofi
  • Food and Health Bureau
  • Sanofi Pasteur
  • Health and Medical Research Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
Keywords
H1N1 influenza, non-pharmaceutical interventions, social distancing, school closures, masking, effective reproduction number, influenza transmission, border restrictions, quarantine and isolation, Hong Kong, COVID-19 pandemic, influenza surveillance, community transmission, pandemic preparedness and response, public health measures
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Hong Kong, Hospitalization, Humans, Influenza, Human, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Pneumonia, Viral, Incidence, Coronavirus Infections, Risk Assessment, Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review