Cited by 2,375COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchRespiratory viral infections research

Clinical progression and viral load in a community outbreak of coronavirus-associated SARS pneumonia: a prospective study

Open access
Peiris, JSM, Chu, CM, Cheng, VCC, Chan, KS, Hung, IFN, Poon, LLM, Law, KI, Tang, BSF +9 more·2003·The Lancet

Abstract

Summary Background We investigated the temporal progression of the clinical, radiological, and virological changes in a community outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Methods We followed up 75 patients for 3 weeks managed with a standard treatment protocol of ribavirin and corticosteroids, and assessed the pattern of clinical disease, viral load, risk factors for poor clinical outcome, and the usefulness of virological diagnostic methods. Findings Fever and pneumonia initially improved but 64 (85%) patients developed recurrent fever after a mean of 8.9 (SD 3.1) days, 55 (73%) had watery diarrhoea after 7.5 (2.3) days, 60 (80%) had radiological worsening after 7.4 (2.2) days, and respiratory symptoms worsened in 34 (45%) after 8.6 (3.0) days. In 34 (45%) patients, improvement of initial pulmonary lesions was associated with appearance of new radiological lesions at other sites. Nine (12%) patients developed spontaneous pneumomediastinum and 15 (20%) developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in week 3. Quantitative reverse-transcriptase (RT) PCR of nasopharyngeal aspirates in 14 patients (four with ARDS) showed peak viral load at day 10, and at day 15 a load lower than at admission. Age and chronic hepatitis B virus infection treated with lamivudine were independent significant risk factors for progression to ARDS (p=0.001). SARS-associated coronavirus in faeces was seen on RT-PCR in 65 (97%) of 67 patients at day 14. The mean time to seroconversion was 20 days. Interpretation The consistent clinical progression, shifting radiological infiltrates, and an inverted V viral-load profile suggest that worsening in week 2 is unrelated to uncontrolled viral replication but may be related to immunopathological damage. Published online May 9, 2003 http://image.thelancet.com/extras/03art4432web.pdf

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13412-5

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The latent period would be at least as long as the incubation period.

    “Thus, the latent period would be at least as long as the incubation period.80,124”

    From Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) mathematical models and disease parameters: a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [80]

    The Results report viral RNA detection and viral loads measured after symptom onset, but give no comparison between the latent and incubation periods. A search for presymptomatic infectiousness and incubation found no passage establishing that the latent period is at least as long as the incubation period. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Very little evidence was found for asymptomatic transmission of SARS-CoV-1, suggesting that most individuals with SARS-CoV-1 infection were symptomatic and that their infectiousness started after presenting with symptoms.

    “Although not a focus of our systematic review, very little evidence was found for asymptomatic transmission of SARS-CoV-1, suggesting that most individuals with SARS-CoV-1 infection were symptomatic and that their infectiousness started after presenting with symptoms.”

    From Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) mathematical models and disease parameters: a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [80]

    The Discussion describes a cohort of symptomatic patients admitted soon after symptom onset, and the Results measure viral RNA only after onset. Our copy does not assess asymptomatic transmission, the proportion of all infected people who were symptomatic, or whether infectiousness began only after symptoms appeared (searched: asymptomatic transmission and infectiousness before symptom onset). (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peiris, J., Chu, C., Cheng, V., Chan, K., Hung, I., Poon, L., Law, K., Tang, B., Hon, T., Chan, C., Chan, K., Ng, J., Zheng, B., Ng, W., Lai, R., Guan, Y., & Yuen, K.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary Hospital (CN)
  • United Christian Hospital (CN)
ORCID
Guan, Y
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-05
Volume
361
Issue
9371
Pages
1767-1772
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2129542667
Cited by
2,375
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 101 · 2022: 138 · 2021: 335 · 2020: 681 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 28
FWCI
128.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Queen Mary University of London
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Hong Kong Government
  • U.S. Public Health Service (A195357)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
Keywords
SARS, SARS-associated coronavirus, clinical progression, viral load, community outbreak, acute respiratory distress syndrome, pneumomediastinum, recurrent fever, diarrhea, radiographic progression, quantitative RT-PCR, nasopharyngeal aspirates, seroconversion, chronic hepatitis B, lamivudine, ribavirin, corticosteroids, immunopathology
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Aged, Disease Outbreaks, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Length of Stay, Lung, Male, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Radiography, Ofloxacin, Survival Rate, Disease Progression, Viral Load, Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination, Pulse Therapy, Drug, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review