Cited by 120Metabolism, Diabetes, and CancerCancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismCancer Risks and Factors

Reduced risk of lung cancer with metformin therapy in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Zhang, Zhi-Jiang, Bi, Yongyi, Li, Shiyue, Zhang, Qingjun, Zhao, Genming, Guo, Yi, Song, Qibin·2014·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Emerging evidence from epidemiologic studies and basic science suggests an inverse association between metformin use and cancer risk in diabetic patients. However, the association with lung cancer is not consistent. We summarized the evidence currently available (2009-2013) and explored sources of heterogeneity. Metformin therapy was associated with significantly lower risks of cancers of the lung (4 studies; pooled relative risk = 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55, 0.95; P = 0.02) and respiratory system (6 studies; pooled relative risk = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.96; P = 0.01). There was evidence of moderate heterogeneity (I(2) > 50%). The major sources of heterogeneity were smoking adjustment status and cancer site. The relative risk from studies that adjusted for smoking was 1.16-fold (95% CI: 1.00, 1.35) closer to the null than that from studies not adjusting for smoking. The relative risk of respiratory cancer was 1.23-fold (95% CI: 1.02, 1.49) closer to the null than that for lung cancer. In conclusion, metformin use appears to be associated with lower risks of lung and respiratory cancer in diabetic patients. However, caution regarding overestimation is needed, since adjustment for smoking attenuates the association.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwu124

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Z.-J., Bi, Y., Li, S., Zhang, Q., Zhao, G., Guo, Y., & Song, Q.
Affiliations
  • Wuhan University (CN)
  • Wuhan Donghu University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Zhi-Jiang
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2014-06-10
Volume
180
Issue
1
Pages
11-14
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W3145105062
Cited by
120
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
metformin, lung cancer, respiratory cancer, diabetes mellitus, cancer risk, smoking adjustment, heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Lung Neoplasms, Metformin, Risk, Risk Factors, Smoking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review