The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ALCOHOL USE AMONG SWEDES AND A PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF THE ALCOHOL USE DISORDERS IDENTIFICATION TEST
Abstract
The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) was completed by 997 persons randomly selected from the general Swedish population (80% response rate). Eighteen per cent of the men and 5% of the women had hazardous or harmful alcohol use according to the > or =8 score criterion. AUDIT scores decreased with increasing age in both genders. Women are more sensitive to alcohol than men and when the cut-off score was set to > or =6, the female prevalence of hazardous or harmful alcohol use increased to nearly 11%. The 'binge drinking' question explained half of the total AUDIT variance and is thus the best item indicator of hazardous or harmful alcohol use in the test. Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses revealed two AUDIT basic factors, the first three items defining a 'hazardous consumption' factor and the other seven items an 'alcohol-related problems' factor. Both the internal and test- retest reliability of the Swedish version of AUDIT were satisfactory. A table for converting raw scores to non-normalized T-scores for each combination of gender and three age intervals is presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“but the basis for this predilection is not well understood.168-170”
From International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (2018) · cites this paper as [170]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
SAUNDERS, J. B., AASLAND, O. G., BABOR, T. F., DE LA FUENTE, J. R., & GRANT, M. (1993) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x · Cited by 13,597
Statistical Methods for Psychology.
Gudgeon, A. C., & Howell, D. C. (1994) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2348956 · Cited by 8,277
(1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,690
Bush, K. (1998) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.158.16.1789 · Cited by 6,196
The Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test: The Quest for a New Diagnostic Instrument
Selzer, M. L. (1971) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.127.12.1653 · Cited by 3,431
THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
(1911) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1911.04260070032017 · Cited by 3,355
Detecting Alcoholism: The CAGE Questionnaire
Ewing, J. A. (1984) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1984.03350140051025 · Cited by 3,005
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
(2010) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/(issn)1530-0277 · Cited by 1,830
A review of research on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT).
Allen, J., Litten, R., Fertig, J., & Babor, T. (1997) · Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.1997.tb03811.x · Cited by 1,016
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Allen, J. P., Columbus, M. and Fertig, J. B. (1995) Assessment in alcoholism treatment: an overview. In National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Treatment Handbook Series 4, Allen, J. P. and Columbus, M. eds, pp. 1-9. US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD.
- Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R. and McDonald, B. P. (1988) Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin 103, 391-410.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The alcohol use disorders identification test: an update of research findings
Reinert, D. F., & Allen, J. P. (2007) · Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00295.x · Cited by 1,397
“CONSTRUCT VALIDITY Four additional studies since our previous review have examined the factor structure of the AUDIT (Bergman and Kallmen, 2002; Carey et al., 2003; Chung et al., 2002; Shields et al., 2004) and have substantially replicated the findings of earlier investigations.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialBerman, A. H., Bergman, H., Palmstierna, T., & Schlyter, F. (2005) · European Addiction Research · doi:10.1159/000081413 · Cited by 977
“Principal component extraction with Varimax rotation yielded two factors explaining 73.8p of the total variance. With this solution, however, items 1, 4 and 8 loaded on both factors. An oblique rotation eliminated multiple loading for item 4. According to this solution, the two factors showed a correlation of 0.44 (n…”
InfluentialSelf-citationde Meneses-Gaya, C., Zuardi, A. W., Loureiro, S. R., & Crippa, J. A. S. (2009) · Psychology & Neuroscience · doi:10.3922/j.psns.2009.1.12 · Cited by 596
“…(Carey, Carey, & Chandra, 2003; Pal, Jena, & Yadav, 2004); Spain (Gómez et al., 2005; Pérula et al., 2005); Brazil (Lima et al., 2005), Switzerland (Bergman & Källmén 2002; Selin, 2003); China (Chen, Chen, & Cheng, 2004, 2005; Tsai, Tsai, Chen, & Liu, 2005); Germany (Bischof et al., 2005; Dybek et…”
Burnout and physical and mental health among Swedish healthcare workers
Peterson, U., Demerouti, E., Bergström, G., Samuelsson, M., Åsberg, M., & Nygren, Å. (2008) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04580.x · Cited by 572
International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis
Wise, S. K., Lin, S. Y., Toskala, E., Orlandi, R. R., Akdis, C. A., Alt, J. A., Azar, A., Baroody, F. M., Bachert, C., Canonica, G. W., et al. (2018) · International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology · doi:10.1002/alr.22073 · Cited by 557
Metadata
- Authors
- Bergman, H.
- Affiliations
- Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Bergman, H.
- Venue
- Alcohol and Alcoholism
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-05-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 245-251
- ISSN
- 0735-0414 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3502
- OpenAlex
- W1995146706
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Alcohol and Alcoholism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Karolinska Institutet
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, auditing, alcoholism, hazardous drinking, binge drinking, alcohol-related problems, psychometric validation, factor structure, test-retest reliability, gender differences, age differences, Swedish population, screening tool
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Alcohol Drinking, Analysis of Variance, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sweden, Alcohol-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review