Cited by 977Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Evaluation of the Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT) in Criminal Justice and Detoxification Settings and in a Swedish Population Sample

Berman, Anne H., Bergman, Hans, Palmstierna, Tom, Schlyter, Frans·2005·European Addiction Research

Abstract

Psychometric properties of the 11-item self-report Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT) were evaluated in a sample of heavy drug users from prison, probation, and inpatient detoxification settings, and in a general Swedish population sample. In the drug user sample, the DUDIT predicted drug dependence with a sensitivity of 90% for both DSM-4 and ICD-10 and a respective specificity of 78 and 88%. Reliability according to Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.80. In the population sample, 3.1% scored positive on the DUDIT; T-score values are suggested. The DUDIT screens effectively for drug-related problems in clinically selected groups and may prove useful in the context of public health surveys.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000081413

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 9 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berman, A. H., Bergman, H., Palmstierna, T., & Schlyter, F.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Venue
European Addiction Research
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2004-12-10
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
22-31
ISSN
  • 1022-6877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9891
OpenAlex
W2017857669
Cited by
977
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 107 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 32
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Addiction Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
psychometric properties, sensitivity and specificity, prison population, probation, inpatient detoxification, self-report screening instruments, public health survey
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Criminal Law, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Personality Assessment, Psychometrics, Reference Values, Statistics as Topic, Illicit Drugs, Reproducibility of Results, Substance Abuse Treatment Centers, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review