Cited by 83Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Modelling the Cost-Effectiveness of Alcohol Screening and Brief Interventions in Primary Care in England

Purshouse, Robin C., Brennan, Alan, Rafia, Rachid, Latimer, Nicholas R., Archer, Rachel J., Angus, Colin R., Preston, Louise R., Meier, Petra S.·2013·Alcohol and Alcoholism

Abstract

AIMS: To estimate the cost-effectiveness and resourcing implications of universal alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) programmes in primary care in England. METHODS: This was a health economic model, combining evidence of the effectiveness and health care resource requirements of SBI activities with existing epidemiological modelling of the relationship between alcohol consumption and health harms. RESULTS: Screening patients on registration with a family doctor would steadily capture ~40% of the population over a 10-year programme; screening patients at next primary care consultation would capture 96% of the population over the same period, but with high resourcing needs in the first year. The registration approach, delivered by a practice nurse, provides modest cost savings to the health care system of £120 m over 30 years. Health gains over the same period amount to 32,000 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). This SBI programme still appears cost-effective (at £6900 per QALY gained) compared with no programme, under pessimistic effectiveness assumptions. Switching to a consultation approach, delivered by a doctor, would incur an incremental net cost of £108 m, with incremental health gains equivalent to 92,000 QALYs, giving an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £1175 per QALY gained compared with current practice. CONCLUSION: A universal programme of alcohol SBI in primary care is estimated to be cost-effective, under all but the most pessimistic assumptions for programme costs and effectiveness. Policymakers should ensure that SBI programmes are routinely evaluated and followed up, given the substantial uncertainty over the effects of many of the implementation details.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/alcalc/ags103

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Purshouse, R. C., Brennan, A., Rafia, R., Latimer, N. R., Archer, R. J., Angus, C. R., Preston, L. R., & Meier, P. S.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Purshouse, Robin C.
Venue
Alcohol and Alcoholism
Published
2012-09-25
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
180-188
ISSN
  • 0735-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3502
OpenAlex
W2167109856
Cited by
83
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Alcohol and Alcoholism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
alcohol screening, brief intervention, cost-effectiveness, primary care, alcohol consumption, quality-adjusted life years, practice nurses, general practitioners, England
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Cost-Benefit Analysis, England, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Models, Economic, Young Adult, Early Medical Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review