Cited by 98Health Policy Implementation ScienceSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Improving the delivery of brief interventions for heavy drinking in primary health care: outcome results of the Optimizing Delivery of Health Care Intervention (ODHIN) five-country cluster randomized factorial trial: Alcohol brief advice in primary health care

Open access
Anderson, Peter, Bendtsen, Preben, Spak, Fredrik, Reynolds, Jillian, Drummond, Colin, Segura, Lidia, Keurhorst, Myrna N., Palacio-Vieira, Jorge +18 more·2016·Addiction

Abstract

AIM: To test if training and support, financial reimbursement and option of referring screen-positive patients to an internet-based method of giving advice (eBI) can increase primary health-care providers' delivery of Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)-C-based screening and advice to heavy drinkers. DESIGN: Cluster randomized factorial trial with 12-week implementation and measurement period. SETTING: Primary health-care units (PHCU) in different locations throughout Catalonia, England, the Netherlands, Poland and Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 120 PHCU, 24 in each of Catalonia, England, the Netherlands, Poland and Sweden. INTERVENTIONS: PHCUs were randomized to one of eight groups: care as usual, training and support (TS), financial reimbursement (FR) and eBI; paired combinations of TS, FR and eBI, and all of FR, TS and eBI. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measure was the proportion of eligible adult (age 18+ years) patients screened during a 12-week implementation period. Secondary outcome measures were proportion of screen-positive patients advised; and proportion of consulting adult patients given an intervention (screening and advice to screen-positives) during the same 12-week implementation period. FINDINGS: During a 4-week baseline measurement period, the proportion of consulting adult patients who were screened for their alcohol consumption was 0.059 per PHCU (95% CI 0.034 to 0.084). Based on the factorial design, the ratio of the logged proportion screened during the 12-week implementation period was 1.48 (95% CI = 1.13-1.95) in PHCU that received TS versus PHCU that did not receive TS; for FR, the ratio was 2.00 (95% CI = 1.56-2.56). The option of referral to eBI did not lead to a higher proportion of patients screened. The ratio for TS plus FR was 2.34 (95% CI = 1.77-3.10), and the ratio for TS plus FR plus eBI was1.68 (95% CI = 1.11-2.53). CONCLUSIONS: Providing primary health-care units with training, support and financial reimbursement for delivering Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-C-based screening and advice to heavy drinkers increases screening for alcohol consumption. Providing primary health-care units with the option of referring screen-positive patients to an internet-based method of giving advice does not appear to increase screening for alcohol consumption.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/add.13476

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Anderson, P., Bendtsen, P., Spak, F., Reynolds, J., Drummond, C., Segura, L., Keurhorst, M. N., Palacio-Vieira, J., Wojnar, M., Parkinson, K., Colom, J., Kłoda, K., Deluca, P., Baena, B., Newbury-Birch, D., Wallace, P., Heinen, M., Wolstenholme, A., van Steenkiste, B., Mierzecki, A., Okulicz-Kozaryn, K., Ronda, G., Kaner, E., Laurant, M. G. H., Coulton, S., & Gual, T.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Program on Substance Abuse, Public Health Agency; Government of Catalonia; Barcelona Spain
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Medical University of Warsaw (PL)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Generalitat de Catalunya (ES)
  • Pomeranian Medical University (PL)
  • Institute of Health and Society; Newcastle University; Newcastle UK
  • University College London (GB)
  • Department of Family Medicine; Maastricht University; Maastricht the Netherlands
  • State Agency for Prevention of Alcohol-Related Problems; Warsaw Poland
  • HAN University of Applied Sciences (NL)
  • University of Kent (GB)
Corresponding author
Anderson, Peter
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-07-25
Volume
111
Issue
11
Pages
1935-1945
ISSN
0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2499038067
Cited by
98
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
23.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • TeesRep (Teesside University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Teesside University Research Portal (Teesside University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (259268)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
health care, brief intervention, heavy drinking, alcohol screening, AUDIT-C, reimbursement, EBI, screening program implementation, alcoholism, primary care providers, screening uptake, Catalonia, England, Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Counseling, Delivery of Health Care, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Patient Education as Topic, Primary Health Care, Psychotherapy, Brief, Cluster Analysis, Internet, Early Diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review