Cited by 56Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesGambling Behavior and TreatmentsMental Health and Psychiatry

The Tangible Common Denominator of Substance Use Disorders: A Reply to Commentaries to Rehm et al. (2013a)

Open access
Rehm, J., Anderson, P., Gual, A., Kraus, L., Marmet, S., Nutt, D. J., Room, R., Samokhvalov, A. V. +5 more·2014·Alcohol and Alcoholism

Abstract

In response to our suggestion to define substance use disorders via 'heavy use over time', theoretical and conceptual issues, measurement problems and implications for stigma and clinical practice were raised. With respect to theoretical and conceptual issues, no other criterion has been shown, which would improve the definition. Moreover, heavy use over time is shown to be highly correlated with number of criteria in current DSM-5. Measurement of heavy use over time is simple and while there will be some underestimation or misrepresentation of actual levels in clinical practice, this is not different from the status quo and measurement of current criteria. As regards to stigma, research has shown that a truly dimensional concept can help reduce stigma. In conclusion, 'heavy use over time' as a tangible common denominator should be seriously considered as definition for substance use disorder.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/alcalc/agt171

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Alcohol dependence is linked both to regular and irregular heavy drinking occasions.

    “The most important category of alcohol use disorders in terms of public health impact is alcohol dependence (F10.2), which is linked both to regular and irregular heavy drinking occasions (see the almost straight linear relationship between average level of drinking and number of symptoms for dependence 40).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rehm, J., Anderson, P., Gual, A., Kraus, L., Marmet, S., Nutt, D. J., Room, R., Samokhvalov, A. V., Scafato, E., Shield, K. D., Trapencieris, M., Wiers, R. W., & Gmel, G.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Addiction Switzerland (CH)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT)
  • University of Latvia (LV)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Rehm, J.
Venue
Alcohol and Alcoholism
Published
2013-11-12
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
118-122
ISSN
  • 0735-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3502
OpenAlex
W1988651105
Cited by
56
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alcohol and Alcoholism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • European Commission (266813)
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
substance use disorders, diagnostic criteria, DSM-5, dimensional models, stigma, clinical practice
MeSH terms
Humans, Time Factors, Substance-Related Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review