Cited by 70Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentLung Cancer Research Studies

A randomized, phase III multicenter trial of gemcitabine in combination with carboplatin or paclitaxel versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

Open access
Treat, J.A., Gonin, R., Socinski, M.A., Edelman, M.J., Catalano, R.B., Marinucci, D.M., Ansari, R., Gillenwater, H.H. +4 more·2010·Annals of Oncology

Abstract

Background Paclitaxel-carboplatin is used as the standard regimen for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This trial was designed to compare gemcitabine + carboplatin or gemcitabine + paclitaxel to the standard regimen.Patients and methods A total of 1135 chemonaive patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were randomly allocated to receive gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) 5.5 on day 1 (GC), gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) on day 1 (GP), or paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) plus carboplatin AUC 6.0 on day 1 (PC). Stratification was based on disease stage, baseline weight loss, and presence or absence of brain metastases. Cycles were repeated every 21 days for up to six cycles or disease progression.Results Median survival (months) with GC was 7.9 compared with 8.5 for GP and 8.7 for PC. Response rates (RRs) were as follows: GC, 25.3%; GP, 32.1%; and PC, 29.8%. The GC arm was associated with a greater incidence of grade 3 or 4 hematologic events but a lower rate of neurotoxicity and alopecia when compared with GP and PC.Conclusions Non-platinum and non-paclitaxel gemcitabine-containing doublets demonstrate similar overall survival and RR compared with the standard PC regimen. However, the treatment arms had distinct toxicity profiles.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/annonc/mdp352

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Green M, Eisenberg P, Kosty M et al. Activity and tolerability of gemcitabine plus weekly cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1998; 17: 468 (Abstr).
  2. Newman SJ, Hansen HH. Proceedings: frequency, diagnosis, and treatment of brain metastases in 247 consecutive patients with bronchogenic carcinoma. Cancer 1974; 33: 492-496.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Treat, J. A., Gonin, R., Socinski, M. A., Edelman, M. J., Catalano, R. B., Marinucci, D. M., Ansari, R., Gillenwater, H. H., Rowland, K. M., Comis, R. L., Obasaju, C. K., & Belani, C. P.
Affiliations
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • Westat (United States) (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Drexel University (US)
  • Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium (US)
  • University of Virginia Medical Center (US)
  • Penn State Cancer Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Treat, J.A.
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
540-547
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125357549
Cited by
70
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
Keywords
gemcitabine, carboplatin, paclitaxel, non-small cell lung cancer, metastatic lung cancer, combination chemotherapy, gemcitabine/carboplatin, carboplatin-paclitaxel, overall survival, response rate, hematologic toxicity, neurotoxicity, hair loss
MeSH terms
Gemcitabine, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Brain Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Deoxycytidine, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Prospective Studies, Survival Rate, Carboplatin, Treatment Outcome, Paclitaxel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review