Cited by 145Bone health and treatmentsProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchBone health and osteoporosis research

Denosumab for the prevention of skeletal complications in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: comparison of skeletal-related events and symptomatic skeletal events

Open access
Smith, M.R., Coleman, R.E., Klotz, L., Pittman, K., Milecki, P., Ng, S., Chi, K.N., Balakumaran, A. +4 more·2015·Annals of Oncology

Abstract

In this analysis of a phase III trial in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases, treatment with denosumab reduced the risk of skeletal complications vs zoledronic acid regardless of whether the end point was defined as SSE or SRE. Both SSEs and SREs were associated with development of moderate/severe pain among patients with no/mild pain at baseline. Background In a phase III trial in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and bone metastases, denosumab was superior to zoledronic acid in reducing skeletal-related events (SREs; radiation to bone, pathologic fracture, surgery to bone, or spinal cord compression). This study reassessed the efficacy of denosumab using symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs) as a prespecified exploratory end point. Patients and methods Patients with CRPC, no previous bisphosphonate exposure, and radiographic evidence of bone metastasis were randomized to subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg plus i.v. placebo every 4 weeks (Q4W), or i.v. zoledronic acid 4 mg plus subcutaneous placebo Q4W during the blinded treatment phase. SSEs were defined as radiation to bone, symptomatic pathologic fracture, surgery to bone, or symptomatic spinal cord compression. The relationship between SSE or SRE and time to moderate/severe pain was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form. Results Treatment with denosumab significantly reduced the risk of developing first SSE [HR, 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66–0.93; P = 0.005] and first and subsequent SSEs (rate ratio, 0.78; 95% CI 0.65–0.92; P = 0.004) compared with zoledronic acid. The treatment differences in the number of patients with SSEs or SREs were similar ( n = 48 and n = 45, respectively). Among patients with no/mild pain at baseline, both SSEs and SREs were associated with moderate/severe pain development ( P < 0.0001). Fewer patients had skeletal complications, particularly fractures, when defined as SSE versus SRE. Conclusion In patients with CRPC and bone metastases, denosumab reduced the risk of skeletal complications versus zoledronic acid regardless of whether the end point was defined as SSE or SRE.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/annonc/mdu519

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, M. R., Coleman, R. E., Klotz, L., Pittman, K., Milecki, P., Ng, S., Chi, K. N., Balakumaran, A., Wei, R., Wang, H., Braun, A., & Fizazi, K.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital (AU)
  • Poznan University of Medical Sciences (PL)
  • St John of God Subiaco Hospital (AU)
  • BC Cancer Agency (CA)
  • Amgen (United States) (US)
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
Corresponding author
Smith, M.R.
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
368-374
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153871840
Cited by
145
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 2
FWCI
9.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • National Institutes of Health (5k24ca121990-07)
  • National Cancer Institute (K24-CA121990)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
Keywords
denosumab, zoledronic acid, castration-resistant prostate cancer, bone metastasis, skeletal-related events, pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, bisphosphonates, bone pain, RANKL inhibition, treatment efficacy comparison, Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form, radiopharmaceuticals
MeSH terms
Denosumab, Aged, Bone Neoplasms, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Bone Density Conservation Agents, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review