Health-related quality of life and pain outcomes with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus standard of care versus standard of care in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (VISION): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial
Open accessAbstract
Background In VISION, the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy lutetium-177 [177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (vipivotide tetraxetan) improved radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival when added to protocol-permitted standard of care in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Here, we report additional health-related quality of life (HRQOL), pain, and symptomatic skeletal event results.Methods This multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial was conducted at 84 cancer centres in nine countries in North America and Europe. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older; had progressive PSMA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0-2; and had previously received of at least one androgen receptor pathway inhibitor and one or two taxane-containing regimens. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either [177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus protocol-permitted standard of care ([177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group) or standard of care alone (control group) using permuted blocks. Randomisation was stratified by baseline lactate dehydrogenase concentration, liver metastases, ECOG performance status, and androgen receptor pathway inhibitor inclusion in standard of care. Patients in the [177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group received intravenous infusions of 7·4 gigabecquerel (GBq; 200 millicurie [mCi]) [177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 every 6 weeks for four cycles plus two optional additional cycles. Standard of care included approved hormonal treatments, bisphosphonates, and radiotherapy. The alternate primary endpoints were radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival, which have been reported. Here we report the key secondary endpoint of time to first symptomatic skeletal event, and other secondary endpoints of HRQOL assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) and EQ-5D-5L, and pain assessed with the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF). Patient-reported outcomes and symptomatic skeletal events were analysed in all patients who were randomly assigned after implementation of measures designed to reduce the dropout rate in the control group (on or after March 5, 2019), and safety was analysed according to treatment received in all patients who received at least one dose of treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03511664, and is active but not recruiting.Findings Between June 4, 2018, and Oct 23, 2019, 831 patients were enrolled, of whom 581 were randomly assigned to the [177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group (n=385) or control group (n=196) on or after March 5, 2019, and were included in analyses of HRQOL, pain, and time to first symptomatic skeletal event. The median age of patients was 71 years (IQR 65-75) in the [177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 72·0 years (66-76) in the control group. Median time to first symptomatic skeletal event or death was 11·5 months (95% CI 10·3-13·2) in the [177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 6·8 months (5·2-8·5) in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·50, 95% CI 0·40-0·62). Time to worsening was delayed in the [177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group versus the control group for FACT-P score (HR 0·54, 0·45-0·66) and subdomains, BPI-SF pain intensity score (0·52, 0·42-0·63), and EQ-5D-5L utility score (0·65, 0·54-0·78). Grade 3 or 4 haematological adverse events included decreased haemoglobin (80 [15%] of 529 assessable patients who received [177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus standard of care vs 13 [6%] of 205 who received standard of care only), lymphocyte concentrations (269 [51%] vs 39 [19%]), and platelet counts (49 [9%] vs five [2%]). Treatment-related adverse events leading to death occurred in five (1%) patients who received [177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus standard of care (pancytopenia [n=2], bone marrow failure [n=1], subdural haematoma [n=1], and intracranial haemorrhage [n=1]) and no patients who received standard of care only.Interpretation [177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus standard of care delayed time to worsening in HRQOL and time to skeletal events compared with standard of care alone. These findings support the use of [177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who received previous androgen receptor pathway inhibitor and taxane treatment.Funding Advanced Accelerator Applications (Novartis).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 11 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
The time to improvement after worsening in BPI-SF pain intensity scale was shorter in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 arm than the control arm.
“The time to improvement after worsening in BPI-SF pain intensity scale was shorter in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 arm than the control arm (appendix p 8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Hazard ratios were in the range of 0.45 to 0.60 for all instruments.
“HRs were in the range of 0·45 to 0·60 for all instruments, and similar delays in time to worsening in score, clinical disease progression, or death were detected in prespecified and post hoc analyses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The time to worsening in EQ-5D-5L utility score was delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group compared with the control group, in both prespecified and post hoc analyses.
“The time to worsening in EQ-5D-5L utility score was delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group compared with the control group, in both prespecified and post hoc analyses (figure 2C and table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The predominant types of symptomatic skeletal event were radiation to relieve bone pain, followed by spinal cord compression.
“The predominant types of SSE were radiation to relieve bone pain, followed by spinal cord compression (table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Mean creatinine levels remained stable over time.
“Mean creatinine levels remained stable over time (figure 3C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
Overall, 21/529 patients (4%) had 177Lu-PSMA-617 dose reductions owing to myelosuppression.
“Overall, 21/529 patients (4%) had 177Lu-PSMA-617 dose reductions owing to myelosuppression (appendix p 15).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the present analyses, time to symptomatic skeletal event or death was delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group compared versus control regardless of bone-targeted therapy use.
“In the present analyses, time to SSE or death was delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group compared versus control regardless of bone-targeted therapy use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The largest differences between the 177Lu-PSMA-617 and control groups were for FACT-P total score and the physical, emotional, and functional well-being subscales.
“The largest differences between the 177Lu-PSMA-617 and control groups were for FACT-P total score and the physical, emotional, and functional well-being subscales (table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Low rates of haematologic and renal toxicity were observed with 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment.
“Low rates of haematologic and renal toxicity were observed with 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Time to first symptomatic skeletal event or death was delayed in the subgroup without concurrent use of bone-targeted therapy (HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.37, 0.68).
“Time to first SSE or death was delayed in subgroups with (hazard ratio [HR], 0·49; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0·36, 0·68) and without (HR, 0·50; 95% CI: 0·37, 0·68) concurrent use of bone-targeted therapy.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“Among the 310/581 (53%) patients not receiving bone-targeted therapy at baseline, the median time to first SSE or death was delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group compared with the control group (table 3 and appendix p 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
Haematologic abnormalities of CTCAE grade 3 or 4 were more frequent in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group than in the control group, particularly for anemia, low lymphocyte levels, and low platelet counts.
“Haematologic abnormalities of CTCAE grade 3 or 4 were more frequent in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group than in the control group, particularly for anemia, low lymphocyte levels, and low platelet counts (appendix p 12).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Time to worsening in FACT-P total score was delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus standard of care group versus standard of care alone (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.35, 0.61).
“Time to worsening was delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus SoC group (n = 385) versus SoC alone (n = 196) for FACT-P total score (HR, 0·46; 95% CI: 0·35, 0·61) and subdomains, BPI-SF pain intensity score (HR, 0·45; 95% CI: 0·33, 0·60) and EQ-5D-5L utility score (HR, 0·49; 95% CI: 0·40, 0·62).”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“The time to worsening in FACT-P total score and all subscales was delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group compared with the control group, in both prespecified and post hoc analyses (figure 2A and table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
Time to first symptomatic skeletal event or death was delayed in the subgroup with concurrent use of bone-targeted therapy (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.36, 0.68).
“Time to first SSE or death was delayed in subgroups with (hazard ratio [HR], 0·49; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0·36, 0·68) and without (HR, 0·50; 95% CI: 0·37, 0·68) concurrent use of bone-targeted therapy.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“Among the 271/581 (47%) patients who were receiving bone-targeted therapy as part of SoC at baseline, the median time to first SSE or death was delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group compared with the control group (Table 3 and appendix p 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
The time to worsening in all BPI-SF scales was delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group compared with the control group, in both prespecified and post hoc analyses.
“The time to worsening in all BPI-SF scales was delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group compared with the control group, in both prespecified and post hoc analyses (figure 2B and table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Rates of haematologic and renal toxicity were low in patients receiving 177Lu-PSMA-617.
“Rates of haematologic and renal toxicity were low in patients receiving 177Lu-PSMA-617.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Low rates of haematologic and renal toxicity were observed with 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data
Time to worsening in EQ-5D-5L utility score was delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus standard of care group versus standard of care alone (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.40, 0.62).
“Time to worsening was delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus SoC group (n = 385) versus SoC alone (n = 196) for FACT-P total score (HR, 0·46; 95% CI: 0·35, 0·61) and subdomains, BPI-SF pain intensity score (HR, 0·45; 95% CI: 0·33, 0·60) and EQ-5D-5L utility score (HR, 0·49; 95% CI: 0·40, 0·62).”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“The time to worsening in EQ-5D-5L utility score was delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group compared with the control group, in both prespecified and post hoc analyses (figure 2C and table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
Similar delays in time to worsening in score, clinical disease progression, or death were detected in prespecified and post hoc analyses.
“HRs were in the range of 0·45 to 0·60 for all instruments, and similar delays in time to worsening in score, clinical disease progression, or death were detected in prespecified and post hoc analyses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Symptomatic skeletal events occurred in 60/385 patients (16%) in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group and 34/196 patients (17%) in the control group.
“SSEs occurred in 60/385 patients (16%) in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group and 34/196 patients (17%) in the control group (table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among patients receiving bone-targeted therapy as part of standard of care at baseline, the median time to first symptomatic skeletal event or death was delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group compared with the control group.
“Among the 271/581 (47%) patients who were receiving bone-targeted therapy as part of SoC at baseline, the median time to first SSE or death was delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group compared with the control group (Table 3 and appendix p 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Results of post hoc analyses of time to worsening in BPI-SF scales using a single threshold of an increase of at least 2 points from baseline were similar to results using the prespecified threshold of an increase of at least 30% or at least 2 points from baseline.
“Results of post hoc analyses of time to worsening in BPI-SF scales using a single threshold of an increase of at least 2 points from baseline were similar to results of analyses using the prespecified threshold of an increase of least 30% or at least 2 points from baseline (appendix p 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among patients not receiving bone-targeted therapy at baseline, the median time to first symptomatic skeletal event or death was delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group compared with the control group.
“Among the 310/581 (53%) patients not receiving bone-targeted therapy at baseline, the median time to first SSE or death was delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group compared with the control group (table 3 and appendix p 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Time to worsening in BPI-SF pain intensity score was delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus standard of care group versus standard of care alone (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.33, 0.60).
“Time to worsening was delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus SoC group (n = 385) versus SoC alone (n = 196) for FACT-P total score (HR, 0·46; 95% CI: 0·35, 0·61) and subdomains, BPI-SF pain intensity score (HR, 0·45; 95% CI: 0·33, 0·60) and EQ-5D-5L utility score (HR, 0·49; 95% CI: 0·40, 0·62).”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“The time to worsening in all BPI-SF scales was delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group compared with the control group, in both prespecified and post hoc analyses (figure 2B and table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
The time to worsening in FACT-P total score and all subscales was delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group compared with the control group, in both prespecified and post hoc analyses.
“The time to worsening in FACT-P total score and all subscales was delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group compared with the control group, in both prespecified and post hoc analyses (figure 2A and table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Haematology and clinical chemistry results provide additional evidence for an acceptable haematological and renal safety profile.
“Haematology and clinical chemistry results provide additional evidence for an acceptable haematological and renal safety profile.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Prespecified VISION analysis showed time to worsening in BPI-SF pain intensity score favored addition of 177Lu-PSMA-617 to standard of care (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.42, 0.63).
“Top-level prespecified HRQoL and pain results from VISION have been briefly reported, with time to worsening in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Prostate (FACT-P) total score (HR, 0·54; 95% CI: 0·45, 0·66) and Brief Pain Inventory–Short Form (BPI-SF) pain intensity score (HR, 0·52; 95% CI: 0·42, 0·63) favoring the addition of 177Lu-PSMA-617 to SoC.12”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Sartor, 2021, Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, N Engl J Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductnone given
Patient-reported outcome questionnaires were completed during study treatment, but not after disease progression or discontinuation of study treatment in VISION.
“PRO questionnaires were completed during study treatment, but not after disease progression or discontinuation of study treatment in VISION.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
These findings suggest that therapies that delay disease progression are associated with maintained health-related quality of life.
“These findings suggest that therapies that delay disease progression are associated with maintained HRQoL.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Baseline characteristics were balanced between the groups.
“Baseline characteristics were balanced between the groups (appendix p 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Among patients remaining in the study, patient-reported outcome completion rates were similar in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group and the control group throughout study treatment.
“Among patients remaining in the study, PRO completion rates were similar in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group and the control group throughout study treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
In the VISION trial, addition of 177Lu-PSMA-617 to standard of care delayed the time to worsening of health-related quality of life and pain in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with at least one androgen receptor pathway inhibitor and one or two taxanes.
“In the VISION trial, addition of 177Lu-PSMA-617 to SoC delayed the time to worsening of HRQoL and pain in patients with mCRPC previously treated with at least one ARPI and one or two taxanes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The VISION population was heavily pre-treated with short remaining life expectancy, so deterioration in health-related quality of life and pain was likely to manifest within the follow-up time.
- Premisecitation
Prespecified VISION analysis showed time to worsening in FACT-P total score favored addition of 177Lu-PSMA-617 to standard of care (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.45, 0.66).
“Top-level prespecified HRQoL and pain results from VISION have been briefly reported, with time to worsening in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Prostate (FACT-P) total score (HR, 0·54; 95% CI: 0·45, 0·66) and Brief Pain Inventory–Short Form (BPI-SF) pain intensity score (HR, 0·52; 95% CI: 0·42, 0·63) favoring the addition of 177Lu-PSMA-617 to SoC.12”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Sartor, 2021, Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, N Engl J Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductcitation
The impact of the high early drop-out rate in the control group was mitigated by analysing health-related quality of life and pain outcomes in the PFS analysis set.
“The impact of the high early drop-out rate in the control group was mitigated by analysing HRQoL and pain outcomes in the PFS analysis set, comprising patients who were randomised after the implementation of measures that reduced the drop-out rate in the control group.12”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Sartor, 2021, Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, N Engl J Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductnone given
The study drop-out rate was higher in the control group than the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group.
“However, the study drop-out rate was higher in the control group than the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
These additional findings from VISION strengthen the rationale for adoption of 177Lu-PSMA-617 as a treatment option in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who have received previous androgen receptor pathway inhibitor and taxane treatment.
“These additional findings from VISION strengthen the rationale for adoption of 177Lu-PSMA-617 as a treatment option in patients with mCRPC who have received previous ARPI and taxane treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
In summary, the efficacy of 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus standard of care in delaying radiographic progression-free survival and prolonging overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer was associated with a longer period without deterioration in patient-reported health-related quality of life and pain, compared with standard of care alone.
“In summary, the efficacy of 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus SoC in delaying rPFS and prolonging OS in patients with mCRPC was associated with a longer period without deterioration in patient-reported HRQoL and pain, compared with SoC alone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Patients who did not complete questionnaires because they died or experienced disease progression were assumed to have worsened in health-related quality of life and pain.
- May combine two claims. 14
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 11
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe incidence of creatinine abnormalities of CTCAE grade 3 or above was low, and similar between the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group and the control group.
“The incidence of creatinine abnormalities of CTCAE grade 3 or above was low, and similar between the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group and the control group (appendix p 12).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWorsening was delayed across all patient-reported outcomes, and all subscales and domains, with the greatest difference in median time to event in BPI-SF pain intensity and FACT-P total score.
“Worsening was delayed across all PROs, and all subscales and domains, with the greatest difference in median time to event in BPI-SF pain intensity and FACT-P total score.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTime to health-related quality-of-life worsening was delayed with 177Lu-PSMA-617 on both the FACT-P and EQ-5D-5L, with similar hazard ratios.
“Time to HRQoL worsening was delayed with 177Lu-PSMA-617 on both the FACT-P and EQ-5D-5L, with similar HRs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe time to worsening in EQ-5D-5L utility score of 0.10 points was also delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group compared with the control group, both when clinical disease progression or death were included and when not included.
“The time to worsening in EQ-5D-5L utility score of 0·10 points was also delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group compared with the control group, both when clinical disease progression or death were included in the definition and when not included (appendix p 9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationAdverse events in the "myelosuppression" and "renal effects" groupings were more frequent during randomised treatment with 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus standard of care than with standard of care alone, but were mainly low-grade.
“Adverse events in the “myelosuppression” and “renal effects” groupings were more frequent during randomised treatment with 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus Soc than with SoC alone, but were mainly low-grade.12”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Sartor, 2021, Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, N Engl J Med source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMean haemoglobin levels and platelet counts remained stable over time.
“Mean haemoglobin levels and platelet counts remained stable over time (figure 3A–B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn VISION, the median time to first symptomatic skeletal event or death was delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group versus control, and spinal cord compression, the most deleterious symptomatic skeletal event, was numerically less frequent.
“In VISION, the median time to first SSE or death was delayed in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group versus control,12 and spinal cord compression, the most deleterious SSE, was numerically less frequent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Sartor, 2021, Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, N Engl J Med source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataQuestionnaire completion rates were similar at the end-of-treatment visit, with data available for approximately 45% of patients in both groups.
“Questionnaire completion rates were similar at the end-of-treatment visit, with data available for approximately 45% of patients in both groups (appendix p 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis safety profile supports 177Lu-PSMA-617 use in often elderly patients with late-stage disease and potentially in younger patients with earlier-stage disease.
“This safety profile supports 177Lu-PSMA-617 use in often elderly patients with late-stage disease29 and potentially in younger patients with earlier-stage disease.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Gillessen, 2021, Decreased fracture rate by mandating bone protecting agents in the EORTC 1333/PEACEIII trial combining Ra223 with enzalutamide versus enzalutamide alone: an updated safety analysis, Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe radioligand 177Lu-PSMA-617 improves quality of life and delays symptomatic skeletal events in patients with advanced metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
“The radioligand 177Lu-PSMA-617 improves quality of life and delays SSEs in patients with advanced mCRPC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataPatients were randomised 2:1 using an interactive response system to receive 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus protocol-permitted standard of care or protocol-permitted standard of care alone using a permuted block scheme.
“In this open-label study, patients were randomised 2:1 using an interactive response system to receive either 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus protocol-permitted SoC (177Lu-PSMA-617 group) or protocol-permitted SoC alone (control group) using a permuted block scheme.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataAmong patients remaining on study treatment, questionnaire completion rates were high.
“Among patients remaining on study treatment, questionnaire completion rates were high (appendix p 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe results support the conclusion that there was no adverse effect of 177Lu-PSMA-617 on health-related quality of life or pain, despite the limitation that data were collected only during study treatment.
“The results support the conclusion that there was no adverse effect of 177Lu-PSMA-617 on HRQoL or pain, despite the limitation that data were collected only during study treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Patients who did not complete questionnaires because they died or experienced disease progression were assumed to have worsened in health-related quality of life and pain.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenSafety was analysed according to treatment received in the safety analysis set, comprising all patients who received at least one dose of randomised treatment.
“Safety was analysed according to treatment received in the safety analysis set, comprising all patients who received at least one dose of randomised treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataPSMA-positive tumor status was determined by 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT imaging during screening and evaluated by independent central review.
“PSMA-positive tumor status was determined by gallium (68Ga) gozetotide (also known as [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11; 68Ga-PSMA-11) positron emission tomography (PET)-CT imaging during screening and evaluated by independent central review.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe lack of double-blinding and placebo control are limitations shared by studies of other radiopharmaceuticals.
“The lack of double-blinding and placebo control are limitations shared by studies of other radiopharmaceuticals.30”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Saad, 2015, Impact of bone-targeted therapies in chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone acetate: post hoc analysis of study COU-AA-302, Eur Urol source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataRandomisation was stratified by baseline lactate dehydrogenase level, presence of liver metastases, ECOG performance status, and inclusion of androgen receptor pathway inhibitor in protocol-permitted standard of care.
“Randomisation was stratified by baseline lactate dehydrogenase level (≤260 IU/L or >260 IU/L), presence of liver metastases (yes or no), ECOG performance status (0/1 or 2), and inclusion of ARPI in protocol-permitted SoC (yes or no).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn VISION, 177Lu-PSMA-617 improved radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival when added to protocol-permitted standard of care in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
“In VISION, the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy lutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetan ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617; 177Lu-PSMA-617) improved radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival when added to protocol-permitted standard of care (SoC) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“In the alternate primary endpoints of the phase 3 VISION trial, 177Lu-PSMA-617 prolonged radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS; hazard ratio [HR], 0·40; 99·2% confidence interval [CI]: 0·29, 0·57; p<0·001) and overall survival (OS, 0·62; 95% CI: 0·52, 0·74; p<0·001) when added to protocol-permitted standard of care (SoC) in patients with advanced PSMA-positive mCRPC.12”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Sartor, 2021, Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, N Engl J Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenOutcomes were analysed in intention-to-treat populations.
“Outcomes were analysed in intention-to-treat populations.”
- Also stated in: § Statistical analysis · plain
“Efficacy outcomes were analysed in intention-to-treat populations; HRQoL outcomes were analysed in the intention-to-treat subset randomised on or after March 5, 2019.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Statistical analysis · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationThese results complement the previously reported primary efficacy endpoints of prolonged radiographic progression-free survival and extended overall survival with 177Lu-PSMA-617 in the VISION trial.
“These results complement the previously reported primary efficacy endpoints of prolonged rPFS and extended OS with 177Lu-PSMA-617 in the VISION trial.12”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Sartor, 2021, Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, N Engl J Med source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenRadiographic imaging was evaluated in accordance with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 and Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 criteria.
“Radiographic imaging was evaluated in accordance with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1·1 (RECIST 1·1) and Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) criteria.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationVISION was an open-label, international, randomised phase 3 trial of the efficacy and safety of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with progressive PSMA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with at least one androgen receptor pathway inhibitor and one or two taxane-containing regimens.
“VISION was an open-label, international, randomised phase 3 trial of the efficacy and safety of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with progressive PSMA-positive mCRPC previously treated with at least one ARPI and one or two taxane-containing regimens, as previously described.12”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Sartor, 2021, Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, N Engl J Med source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationPatient-reported outcomes and symptomatic skeletal events were analysed according to assigned treatment group in the PFS analysis set, comprising patients randomised on or after March 5, 2019.
“PROs and SSEs were analysed according to assigned treatment group in the PFS analysis set, comprising patients who were randomised after implementation of the measures designed to reduce the drop-out rate in the control group (on or after March 5, 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Sartor, 2021, Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, N Engl J Med source
Not checked in the free run.
The authors state this as an assumption.
Patients who did not complete questionnaires because they died or experienced disease progression were assumed to have worsened in health-related quality of life and pain.
“Death and disease progression were included in the prespecified composite endpoints of HRQoL and pain worsening, which were therefore assumed to have worsened in patients who did not complete questionnaires because they died or experienced disease progression.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The VISION population was heavily pre-treated with short remaining life expectancy, so deterioration in health-related quality of life and pain was likely to manifest within the follow-up time.
“The VISION population was heavily pre-treated with short remaining life expectancy, so deterioration in HRQoL and pain was likely to manifest within the follow-up time.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Patients with advanced and highly pre-treated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer inevitably experience declining health-related quality of life and death.
“Sustained worsening was not assessed in VISION because of the relatively long interval between PRO assessments (6 or 12 weeks), and because of inevitable declining HRQoL and death in patients with advanced and highly pre-treated mCRPC.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
177Lu-PSMA-617 improved health-related quality of life and pain outcomes compared with standard of care.
“Subsequent studies have further evaluated health-related quality of life and pain outcomes using 177Lu-PSMA- 617 and found that these metrics were both improved as compared to treatment with SOC”
From PSMA-based Therapies and Novel Therapies in Advanced Prostate Cancer: The Now and the Future (2025) · cites this paper as [12]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
LDH stratification cutoff uses conflicting units
MinorThe randomisation section gives the lactate dehydrogenase cutoff in IU/L, while the statistical analysis section gives the same numeric cutoff in U/mL. Those units differ by a factor of 1000.
“Randomisation was stratified by baseline lactate dehydrogenase level (≤260 IU/L or >260 IU/L)”
“stratified by baseline lactate dehydrogenase level (≤260 U/mL or >260 U/mL)”
Cites
EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life
(1990) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 · Cited by 15,736 · see citing works
Lutetium-177–PSMA-617 for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Sartor, O., de Bono, J., Chi, K. N., Fizazi, K., Herrmann, K., Rahbar, K., Tagawa, S. T., Nordquist, L. T., Vaishampayan, N., El-Haddad, G., et al. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2107322 · Cited by 2,864 · see citing works
Self-citationFizazi, K. S., Carducci, M. A., Smith, M. R., Damião, R., Brown, J. E., Karsh, L. I., Milecki, P., Shore, N. D., Rader, M. E., Wang, H., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62344-6 · Cited by 1,974 · see citing works
Self-citationHofman, M. S., Emmett, L., Sandhu, S., Iravani, A., Joshua, A. M., Goh, J. C., Pattison, D. A., Tan, T. H., Kirkwood, I. D., Ng, S., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00237-3 · Cited by 1,170 · see citing works
Prostate cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Parker, C., Castro, E., Fizazi, K., Heidenreich, A., Ost, P., Procopio, G., Tombal, B., & Gillessen, S. (2020) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.011 · Cited by 977 · see citing works
Self-citationEstimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer
Pickard, A. S., Neary, M. P., & Cella, D. F. (2007) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-5-70 · Cited by 932 · see citing works
Esper, P., Mo, F., Chodak, G., Sinner, M., Cella, D., & Pienta, K. J. (1997) · Urology · doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00459-7 · Cited by 696 · see citing works
Prostate cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Horwich, A., Parker, C. C., Bangma, C., & Kataja, V. V. (2010) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq174 · Cited by 602 · see citing works
Sartor, O., & de Bono, J. S. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1701695 · Cited by 546 · see citing works
Self-citationViolet, J., Jackson, P., Ferdinandus, J., Sandhu, S., Akhurst, T., Iravani, A., Kong, G., Kumar, A. R., Thang, S. P., Eu, P., et al. (2019) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.118.219352 · Cited by 504 · see citing works
Halabi, S., Kelly, W. K., Ma, H., Zhou, H., Solomon, N. C., Fizazi, K., Tangen, C. M., Rosenthal, M., Petrylak, D. P., Hussain, M., et al. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.65.7270 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Self-citationNuhn, P., De Bono, J. S., Fizazi, K., Freedland, S. J., Grilli, M., Kantoff, P. W., Sonpavde, G., Sternberg, C. N., Yegnasubramanian, S., & Antonarakis, E. S. (2019) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2018.03.028 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
Self-citationMinner, S., Wittmer, C., Graefen, M., Salomon, G., Steuber, T., Haese, A., Huland, H., Bokemeyer, C., Yekebas, E., Dierlamm, J., et al. (2011) · The Prostate · doi:10.1002/pros.21241 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Rathkopf, D. E., Smith, M. R., Bono, J. S. D., Logothetis, C. J., Shore, N. D., SOUZA, P. D., Fizazi, K. S., Mulders, P., Mainwaring, P. N., Hainsworth, J. D., et al. (2014) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.056 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Self-citationSmith, M. R., Bono, J. S. D., Sternberg, C. N., Moulec, S. L., Oudard, S. M., Giorgi, U. D., Krainer, M., Bergman, A. M., Hoelzer, W., de Wit, R., et al. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.65.5597 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Self-citationBoyle, H. J., Alibhai, S. M. H., Decoster, L., Efstathiou, E., Fizazi, K. S., Mottet, N., Oudard, S. M., Payne, H. A., Prentice, M., Puts, M. T. E., et al. (2019) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.031 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Self-citationPain Predicts Overall Survival in Men With Metastatic Castration-Refractory Prostate Cancer
Halabi, S., Vogelzang, N. J., Kornblith, A. B., Ou, S., Kantoff, P. W., Dawson, N. A., & Small, E. J. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.15.0367 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Self-citationSmith, M. R., Coleman, R. E., Klotz, L., Pittman, K., Milecki, P., Ng, S., Chi, K. N., Balakumaran, A., Wei, R., Wang, H., et al. (2015) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu519 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Self-citationFizazi, K., Massard, C., Smith, M., Rader, M., Brown, J., Milecki, P., Shore, N., Oudard, S., Karsh, L., Carducci, M., et al. (2015) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.001 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Self-citationGillessen, S., Armstrong, A., Attard, G., Beer, T. M., Beltran, H., Bjartell, A., Bossi, A., Briganti, A., Bristow, R. G., Bulbul, M., et al. (2022) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2022.04.002 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Self-citationMetastatic prostate cancer and the bone: significance and therapeutic options
Gartrell, B. A., Coleman, R., Efstathiou, E., Fizazi, K., Logothetis, C. J., Smith, M. R., Sonpavde, G., Sartor, O., & Saad, F. (2015) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.039 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Self-citationCella, D., Ivanescu, C., Holmstrom, S., Bui, C. N., Spalding, J., & Fizazi, K. (2015) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu510 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Self-citationNussbaum, N. C., George, D. J., Abernethy, A. P., Dolan, C., Oestreicher, N., Flanders, S. C., & Dorff, T. B. (2016) · Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases · doi:10.1038/pcan.2015.42 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Rowe, S. P., Gorin, M. A., & Pomper, M. G. (2019) · Annual Review of Medicine · doi:10.1146/annurev-med-062117-073027 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Fizazi, K. S., Kramer, G., Eymard, J., Sternberg, C. N., Bono, J. S. D., Castellano, D., TOMBAL, B. F., Wülfing, C., Liontos, M., Carles, J., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30449-6 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationSaad, F., Shore, N., Van Poppel, H., Rathkopf, D. E., Smith, M. R., de Bono, J. S., Logothetis, C. J., de Souza, P., Fizazi, K., Mulders, P. F. A., et al. (2015) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.032 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationMcKay, R., Haider, B., Duh, M. S., Valderrama, A., Nakabayashi, M., Fiorillo, M., Ristovska, L., Wen, L., & Kantoff, P. (2017) · Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases · doi:10.1038/pcan.2017.4 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Gillessen, S., Choudhury, A., Rodríguez‐Vida, A., Nolè, F., Gallardo, E., Roumeguere, T. A., Daugaard, G., Loriot, Y., Fred Saad, C., McDermott, R., et al. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.5002 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Devlin, N. J., Herdman, M. J., Pavesi, M., Phung, D., Naidoo, S., Beer, T. M., TOMBAL, B. F., Loriot, Y., Ivanescu, C., Parli, T., et al. (2017) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0704-y · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Terrisse, S. A., Karamouza, E., Parker, C. C., Sartor, O. A., James, N. D., Pirrie, S. J., Collette, L., TOMBAL, B. F., Chahoud, J., Smeland, S., et al. (2019) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.4097 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationManagement of Bone Metastases in Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Cathomas, R. L., Bajory, Z., Bouzid, M., Ghoneimy, A. M. E., Gillessen, S., Gonçalves, F., Kacsó, G., Kramer, G., Milecki, P., Pacík, D., et al. (2014) · Urologia Internationalis · doi:10.1159/000358258 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Hussain, A., Lee, R. J., Graff, J. N., & Halabi, S. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.04.020 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Joly, F., Oudard, S. M., Fizazi, K. S., Tubach, F., Jové, J., Lacueille, C., Lamarque, S., Guiard, E., Balestra, A., Droz‐Perroteau, C., et al. (2020) · Clinical Genitourinary Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.clgc.2020.02.003 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Morris, M. J., Castellano, D., Herrmann, K., de Bono, J. S., Shore, N. D., Chi, K. N., Crosby, M., Piulats, J. M., Fléchon, A., Wei, X. X., et al. (2024) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(24)01653-2 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Self-citationHofman, M. S., Emmett, L., Sandhu, S., Iravani, A., Buteau, J. P., Joshua, A. M., Goh, J. C., Pattison, D. A., Tan, T. H., Kirkwood, I. D., et al. (2024) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00529-6 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Kuo, P. H., Morris, M. J., Hesterman, J., Kendi, A. T., Rahbar, K., Wei, X. X., Fang, B., Adra, N., Garje, R., Michalski, J. M., et al. (2024) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.233460 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citationZhang, Y., Li, Y., Quan, Z., Xiao, P., & Duan, J. (2024) · Antioxidants · doi:10.3390/antiox13020203 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Advances in Treatment and Symptom Management
Kulasegaran, T., & Oliveira, N. (2024) · Current Treatment Options in Oncology · doi:10.1007/s11864-024-01215-2 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Garje, R., Riaz, I. B., Naqvi, S. A. A., Rumble, R. B., Taplin, M., Kungel, T. M., Herchenhorn, D., Zhang, T., Beckermann, K. E., Vapiwala, N., et al. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco-25-00007 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Schaefer-Schuler, A., Burgard, C., Blickle, A., Maus, S., Petrescu, C., Petto, S., Bartholomä, M. D., Stemler, T., Ezziddin, S., & Rosar, F. (2024) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.92273 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
The molecular blueprint of targeted radionuclide therapy
Primac, I., Tabury, K., Tasdogan, A., Baatout, S., & Herrmann, K. (2025) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-025-01069-z · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationFizazi, K. S., Chi, K. N., Shore, N. D., Herrmann, K., Bono, J. S. D., Castellano, D., Piulats, J. M., Fléchon, A., Wei, X. X., Mahammedi, H., et al. (2025) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2025.07.003 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationChi, K. N., Armstrong, A. J., Krause, B. J., Herrmann, K., Rahbar, K., de Bono, J. S., Adra, N., Garje, R., Michalski, J. M., Kempel, M. M., et al. (2024) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2023.12.004 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationMultivariable models of outcomes with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617: analysis of the phase 3 VISION trial
Herrmann, K., Gafita, A., Bono, J. S. D., Sartor, O., Chi, K. N., Krause, B. J., Rahbar, K., Tagawa, S. T., Czernin, J., El-Haddad, G. E., et al. (2024) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102862 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationProstate-Specific Membrane Antigen: Gateway to Management of Advanced Prostate Cancer
Unterrainer, L. M., Calais, J., & Bander, N. H. (2024) · Annual Review of Medicine · doi:10.1146/annurev-med-081522-031439 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationPSMA Radioligand Therapy in Prostate Cancer
Almeida, L. S., Etchebehere, E., Megías, I. G., Terán, A. K. C., Hadaschik, B. A., Colletti, P. M., Herrmann, K., Giammarile, F., & Bolton, R. C. D. (2023) · Clinical Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.1097/rlu.0000000000004919 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationPSMA-targeted therapy for non-prostate cancers
Wang, J. H., & Kiess, A. P. (2023) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1220586 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Armstrong, A. J., Sartor, O. A., Bono, J. S. D., Chi, K., Fizazi, K. S., Krause, B. J., Herrmann, K., Rahbar, K., Tagawa, S. T., Fred Saad, C., et al. (2024) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2024.08.021 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationLiu, X., Li, Y., Geng, R., Chen, L., Yang, P., Li, M., Luo, X., Yang, Y., Li, L., & Cai, H. (2023) · Biomaterials Research · doi:10.1186/s40824-023-00455-x · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Fizazi, K. S., Morris, M. J., Shore, N. D., Chi, K. N., Crosby, M. J., Bono, J. S. D., Herrmann, K., Roubaud, G., Nagarajah, J., Fleming, M. T., et al. (2025) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00189-5 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationCurrent clinical application of lutetium‑177 in solid tumors (Review)
Niu, T., Mi, F., Lin, B., Gao, F., Tan, B., & Du, X. (2024) · Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine · doi:10.3892/etm.2024.12514 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
From biology to the clinic — exploring liver metastasis in prostate cancer
Ni, X., Yu, W., Li, X., Pan, J., Fang, B., Zhang, T., Lu, Y., Ye, D., & Zhu, Y. (2024) · Nature Reviews Urology · doi:10.1038/s41585-024-00875-x · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Privé, B. M., Noordzij, W., Muselaers, S., de Jong, I. J., van Oort, I. M., Janssen, M. J. R., van Rijk, M. C., van Gemert, W. A., Timmermans, B. J. R., de Groot, M., et al. (2026) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00762-4 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationPSMA Radiotheranostics in Prostate Cancer: Principles, Practice, and Future Prospects
Szidonya, L. K., Barwick, T. D., Challapalli, A., Naik, M., Eccles, A., Barbon, D. A., & Mallak, N. (2024) · Radiographics · doi:10.1148/rg.240080 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Rosar, F., Schuler, J., Burgard, C., Blickle, A., Bartholomä, M. D., Maus, S., Petto, S., Khreish, F., Schaefer, A., & Ezziddin, S. (2024) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-024-06825-4 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
PSMA-based Therapies and Novel Therapies in Advanced Prostate Cancer: The Now and the Future
Ayzman, A., Pachynski, R. K., & Reimers, M. A. (2025) · Current Treatment Options in Oncology · doi:10.1007/s11864-025-01317-5 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Targeting AURKA with multifunctional nanoparticles in CRPC therapy
Deng, B., Ke, B., Tian, Q., Gao, Y., Zhai, Q., & Zhang, W. (2024) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-024-03070-7 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
177Lu-PSMA (R)Evolution in Cancer Care: Is It Really Happening?
Poschenrieder, A., Taleska, J., & Schaetz, L. (2024) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.124.267951 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Effects of Targeted Radionuclide Therapy on Cancer Cells Beyond the Ablative Radiation Dose
Ferro‐Flores, G., Azorin‐Vega, E. P., Ocampo‐García, B., Luna‐Gutiérrez, M., Cruz-Nova, P., & Meléndez‐Alafort, L. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26146968 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Prostate Cancer Radioligand Therapy: PSMA and Beyond, Current Landscape and Future Directions
Bent, E. H., & Morris, M. J. (2025) · Current Oncology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11912-025-01686-y · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationTagawa, S. T., Sartor, O., Piulats, J. M., Fred Saad, C., Fizazi, K. S., Reid, A., Beltran, H., Kramer, G., Mahammedi, H., Eiber, M., et al. (2026) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(26)01092-5 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationLee, J.-H., & Kim, T. J. (2025) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines13051132 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Chi, K. N., Yip, S., Bauman, G. S., Probst, S., Emmenegger, U., Kollmannsberger, C., Martineau, P., Niazi, T. M., Pouliot, F., Rendon, R. A., et al. (2024) · Current Oncology · doi:10.3390/curroncol31030106 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationBrinkmann, C., Baum, R. P., & Stargardt, T. (2025) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-025-07317-9 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Cicchetti, R., Basconi, M., Litterio, G., Orsini, A., Mascitti, M., Digiacomo, A., Salzano, G., Tătaru, O. S., Ferro, M., Giulioni, C., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms262311665 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Wu, S., Hu, W., Chen, M., Xiao, X., & Liu, R. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-77889-3 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Rosar, F., Khreish, F., Nagel, L. S., Blickle, A., Burgard, C., Petto, S., Bastian, M. B., Speicher, T., Bartholomä, M. D., Maus, S., et al. (2024) · Clinical Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.1097/rlu.0000000000005640 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
PDCdb: the biological activity and pharmaceutical information of peptide–drug conjugate (PDC)
Sun, X., Li, H., Chen, Z., Zhang, Y., Wei, Z., Xu, H., Liao, Y., Jiang, W., Ge, Y., Zheng, L., et al. (2024) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkae859 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Luna‐Gutiérrez, M., Hernández-Ramírez, R., Soto-Abundiz, A., García-Pérez, F. O., Ancira-Cortez, A., López-Buenrostro, S., Gibbens-Bandala, B., Soldevilla-Gallardo, I., Lara‐Almazán, N., Rojas-Pérez, M., et al. (2023) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15071988 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Pre- or post-chemotherapy: effect on PSMA uptake
Yadav, S., Tuchayi, A. M., Moradpour, M., Jiang, F., Juarez, R., de Kouchkovsky, I., Flavell, R. R., Aggarwal, R. R., & Hope, T. A. (2025) · EJNMMI Research · doi:10.1186/s13550-025-01229-3 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Holzgreve, A., Delker, A., Ells, Z., Brosch-Lenz, J., Unterrainer, L. M., Nikitas, J. N., Zhu, S., Contreras, M. M., Alam, H., Nabong, R., et al. (2025) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.125.269495 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationEmerging Theranostics for Prostate Cancer and a Model of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Therapy
Jewell, K. E., Hofman, M. S., Ong, J. S. L., & Levy, S. (2024) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.231703 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Advances in conjugate drug delivery System: Opportunities and challenges
Zhu, Y., Wu, J., & Zhi, F. (2024) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124867 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Belabaci, Z., Sleiay, M., Abdelshafi, A., Otmani, Z., Moubarak, E. S., & Amer, F. (2025) · Clinical Genitourinary Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102398 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Borges, N., Losee, M., Liu, M., Cheng, S., Könik, A., Ritzer, J., Wolanski, A., Ng, T. S. C., Choudhury, A. D., Taplin, M., et al. (2025) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-025-07541-3 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Cursano, M. C., Valsecchi, A. A., Pantano, F., Maïo, M. D., Procopio, G., Berruti, A., Bertoldo, F., Tucci, M., Giorgi, U. D., Santini, D., et al. (2024) · ESMO Open · doi:10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103484 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Comparison of 18F-DCFPyL and 68Ga-PSMA-11 for 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy patient selection
Yadav, S., Kim, S. T., Tuchayi, A. M., Jiang, F., Morley, A., Saelee, R., Wang, Y., Juarez, R., Lawnh-Heath, C., Koshkin, V. S., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2024.1382582 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationViscuse, P. V., Devitt, M. E., & Dreicer, R. (2024) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.123.267006 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Innovative Drug Modalities for the Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer
Capuozzo, M., Santorsola, M., Ianniello, M., Ferrara, F., Zovi, A., Petrillo, N., Castiello, R., Fantuz, M., Ottaiano, A., & Savarese, G. (2024) · Diseases · doi:10.3390/diseases12050087 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Morris, M. J., Bono, J. S. D., Nagarajah, J., Sartor, O. A., Wei, X. X., Nordquist, L. T., Koshkin, V. S., Chi, K. N., Krause, B. J., Herrmann, K., et al. (2024) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.35438 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationZamanian, A., Rousseau, É., Buteau, F.-A., Arsenault, F., Beaulieu, A., April, G., Juneau, D., Plouznikoff, N., Turcotte, É. E., Allard, C., et al. (2025) · Cancer Imaging · doi:10.1186/s40644-025-00910-z · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationAshhar, Z., Fadzil, M. F. A., Safee, Z. M., Aziz, F., Ibarhim, U. H., Afinde, N. M. F. N., Ail, N. M., Harizan, M. A. H. J., Halib, D., Amran, A. A., et al. (2023) · Applied Radiation and Isotopes · doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2023.111161 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Bastian, M. B., Sieben, M., Blickle, A., Burgard, C., Speicher, T., Bartholomä, M. D., Schaefer-Schuler, A., Maus, S., Ezziddin, S., & Rosar, F. (2024) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-024-07006-z · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Fay, A. P., Fizazi, K. S., Matsubara, N., Azad, A., Fred Saad, C., Giorgi, U. D., Joung, J. Y., Fong, P. C. C., Jones, R. J., Zschäbitz, S., et al. (2025) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00031-2 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationFlippot, R., Telli, T., Velev, M., Fléchon, A., Vries-Brilland, M. D., Turpin, L., Bergman, A. M., Turco, F., Mahammedi, H., Fendler, W. P., et al. (2024) · European Urology Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.euo.2024.03.013 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationFeasibility of177Lu-PSMA Administration as Outpatient Procedure for Prostate Cancer
Zagni, F., Vetrone, L., Farolfi, A., Vadalà, M., Rizzini, E. L., Golemi, A., Strigari, L., & Fanti, S. (2024) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.124.268062 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Murthy, V., Kimura, K., Theus, L., Nguyen, A., Grogan, T., Lokre, O., Perk, T., Rettig, M. B., Drakaki, A., Shen, J., et al. (2025) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.125.270916 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationNikitas, J. N., Holzgreve, A., Juarez, J. E., Kimura, K., Lira, S., Alam, H., Contreras, M., Theus, L., Nguyen, A. T., Ells, Z., et al. (2026) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.125.271231 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationMahadevan, A., Yazdanpanah, O., Patel, V., Benjamin, D. J., & Kalebasty, A. R. (2024) · Current Problems in Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2024.101171 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Theranostics in Perspective: White Paper
Stokkel, M. P. M., Gotthardt, M., Herrmann, K., & Gnanasegaran, G. (2025) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.125.269776 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationShao, C., Wan, Q., Guo, J., & Chen, Z. (2025) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2025.1586650 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Mehra, N., Antonarakis, E. S., Park, S. H., Goh, J. C. H., McDermott, R., González, N. S., Fong, P. C. C., Greil, R., Santis, M. D., Yanez, P. E., et al. (2025) · European Urology Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.euo.2025.04.018 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Schottelius, M. (2024) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-024-07020-1 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Liang, X., Peng, S., Huang, H. W., Xu, J., Liu, W., Wang, H., & Li, Q. (2024) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000040275 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Immunomodulation and Immunotherapy for Patients with Prostate Cancer: An Up-to-Date Review
Murray, N. P. (2025) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines13051179 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
PSMA Radioligand Therapy in Advanced Age
Bastian, M. B., Wörl, B., Blickle, A., Burgard, C., Speicher, T., Wessendorf, J., Bartholomä, M. D., Schaefer-Schuler, A., Maus, S., Ezziddin, S., et al. (2025) · Clinical Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.1097/rlu.0000000000005968 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Hennes, D. M. Z. B., Weindler, J. J., Babst, C., Perera, M., Murphy, D. G., & Eapen, R. S. (2025) · Current Opinion in Urology · doi:10.1097/mou.0000000000001323 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Yang, C., Li, P., Chen, Y., Zheng, J., Zhang, X., Gao, H., Zhang, L., & Wang, K. (2024) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-024-08610-3 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., Zhu, W., Tao, R., Li, W., Jiang, C., & Yan, X. C. (2025) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-025-06091-4 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Matsubara, N., Petrylak, D. P., Ratta, R., Korbenfeld, E. P., Gafanov, R. A., Mourey, L., Todenhöfer, T., Gurney, H., Kramer, G., Bergman, A. M., et al. (2025) · European Urology Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.euo.2025.02.015 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationJadvar, H., Rahbar, K., Ahmadzadehfar, H., Heidari, P., Esfahani, S. A., Afshar‐Oromieh, A., & Iravani, A. (2025) · The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.23736/s1824-4785.25.03641-6 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Potential Contribution of Radiopharmaceutical Therapies in Managing Oligometastatic Disease
Kishan, A. U., Siva, S., Hofman, M. S., Nagarajah, J., Kiess, A. P., Tran, P. T., & Calais, J. (2024) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.123.266772 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationSchedeit, C., Gözlügöl, N., Alsheikh, R. S., Shelan, M., Seifert, R., Caobelli, F., Borner, U., Iizuka, T., Schaller, B., Rominger, A., et al. (2025) · Clinical Oral Investigations · doi:10.1007/s00784-025-06300-w · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Bastian, M. B., Wörl, B., Blickle, A., Burgard, C., Speicher, T., Bartholomä, M. D., Schaefer-Schuler, A., Maus, S., Ezziddin, S., & Rosar, F. (2025) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-025-07346-4 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Nuclear Medicine and External Beam Radiation Therapy in Prostate Cancer: A Synergistic Approach
Abdel-Wahab, M., & Giammarile, F. (2026) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.125.271268 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
177Lu-PSMA for prostate cancer: progress, challenges and future perspectives
Xi, Z., Ji, S., Zhang, Y., Sun, M.-H., Jia, G., & Jiang, Q. (2026) · Asian Journal of Andrology · doi:10.4103/aja2025103 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Review of radiopharmaceutical therapy in prostate cancer
Miller, S. R., Dewaraja, Y. K., Rowe, S. P., Reichert, Z. R., & Viglianti, B. L. (2026) · Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations · doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111030 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Zuur, L. G., Hoogenkamp, D. S., van der Sar, E. C. A., van Asten, D., Lam, M. G. E. H., van Zyp, J. R. N. V. D. V., van Leeuwen, P. J., der Veen, B. J. D. W., de Vries–Huizing, D. M. V., Hendrikx, J. J. M. A., et al. (2026) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-026-07956-6 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Hu, J., Seifert, R., Gomes, C. V., Chen, Y., Liu, Y., Jutidamrongphan, W., Amon, M., Wang, J., Xue, S., Rominger, A., et al. (2026) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-026-07936-w · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Why does PSMA PET improve quality of life?
Evangelista, L., & Morigi, J. J. (2023) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-023-06307-z · Cited by 1 · see citing works
PSMA-Directed Radioligand Therapy for Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Heitlinger, E. (2023) · healthbook TIMES Oncology Hematology · doi:10.36000/hbt.oh.2023.18.130
Theranostics in prostaatkanker
Privé, B. M., Muselaers, S., Peters, S. M. B., Timmermans, B. J. R., Westdorp, H., Franken, M. D., Vis, A. N., Janssen, M. J. R., Oprea‐Lager, D. E., & Nagarajah, J. (2024) · Tijdschrift voor Urologie · doi:10.1007/s13629-024-00423-7
Self-citationGalietta, E., Strolin, S., Rizzini, E. L., Castellucci, P., Cilla, S., Buwenge, M., Vadalà, M., Fanti, S., Ntreta, M., Strigari, L., et al. (2024) · British Journal of Urology · doi:10.1111/bju.16399
Optimizing assessments of quality of life in contemporary prostate cancer clinical trials
Morgans, A. K. (2024) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.35485
Genomic Discoveries: Precision Medicine and Personalized Approaches in Prostate Cancer Care
Bida, M., Mosoane, B., Nonxuba, M., Disenyane, D., Mongan, N. P., & Dlamini, Z. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-64388-0_4
Calvo, O. F., Iglesias, J. M., Casas, E. A. J., Molina-Díaz, A., Anido, U., Nebra, J. C., García-Bernardo, L., Martínez-Breijo, S., Lázaro-Quintela, M., Garcia, G. M., et al. (2024) · Clinical & Translational Oncology · doi:10.1007/s12094-024-03662-7
Neue Therapieoptionen des kastrationsresistenten Prostatakarzinoms
Klier, J. (2024) · best practice onkologie · doi:10.1007/s11654-024-00613-0
Guignard, R., Chambert, B., Collet, H., Comte, F., de Verbizier, D., Sibille, L., & Tabaa, Y. A. (2025) · Médecine Nucléaire · doi:10.1016/j.mednuc.2024.12.064
Naqvi, S. A. A., Anjum, M. U., Bibi, A., Khan, M. A., Khakwani, K. Z. R., He, H., Imran, M., Kazmi, S. Z., Raina, A., Cobran, E. K., et al. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.04.15.25325837 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationHandlungsempfehlungen und Maßnahmen
Krieger, J., Berkemeier, F., & Sussmann, S. (2025) · Medizinisch Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft eBooks · doi:10.32745/9783954669851-3
Eine Versorgungsanalyse zur Radioligandentherapie am Beispiel des Prostatakarzinoms
Krieger, J., Berkemeier, F., & Sussmann, S. (2025) · Medizinisch Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft eBooks · doi:10.32745/9783954669851-2
Krieger, J., Berkemeier, F., & Sussmann, S. (2025) · Medizinisch Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft eBooks · doi:10.32745/9783954669851-4
Berkemeier, F., Krieger, J., & Sussmann, S. (2025) · Medizinisch Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft eBooks · doi:10.32745/9783954669851
Krieger, J., Berkemeier, F., & Sussmann, S. (2025) · Medizinisch Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft eBooks · doi:10.32745/9783954669851-1
Bastian, M. B., Speicher, T., Blickle, A., Burgard, C., Bastian, J. L., Bartholomä, M. D., Schaefer-Schuler, A., Maus, S., Ezziddin, S., & Rosar, F. (2025) · EJNMMI Research · doi:10.1186/s13550-025-01280-0
Trf-34-86j8wpmn1e8y2q Promotes Occurrence and Development of Gastric Cancer Via Combining with LratPreprint
Cao, C., Xu, S., & Li, Z. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5382868
PSMA-Radioligandentherapie – State of the Art
Berliner, C., Grünwald, V., Krafft, U., Himmen, S., & Fendler, W. P. (2025) · Die Urologie · doi:10.1007/s00120-025-02661-y · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Cao, C., Xu, S., & Li, Z. (2025) · Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s00432-025-06332-5
Huang, Y.-Y., Huang, K., & Lee, P. (2025) · Nuclear Medicine Communications · doi:10.1097/mnm.0000000000002086
Xiao, L., Li, Y., Geng, R., Chen, L., Yang, P., Li, M., Luo, X., Yang, Y., Li, L., & Cai, H. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.24500892
Xiao, L., Li, Y., Geng, R., Chen, L., Yang, P., Li, M., Luo, X., Yang, Y., Li, L., & Cai, H. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.24500859
Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
Sayegh, M. N., Tam, A., Huang, Z., & Li, Y. R. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-51192-0_103-1
Radioligandentherapie des metastasierten, kastrationsresistenten Prostatakarzinoms
Dahlke, P. M., Ruhwedel, T., & Rogasch, J. M. M. (2025) · Springer Reference Medizin · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-46764-0_398-1
- Authors
- Fizazi, K., Herrmann, K., Krause, B. J., Rahbar, K., Chi, K. N., Morris, M. J., Sartor, O., Tagawa, S. T., Kendi, A. T., Vogelzang, N., Calais, J., Nagarajah, J., Wei, X. X., Koshkin, V. S., Beauregard, J.-M., Chang, B., Ghouse, R., DeSilvio, M., Messmann, R. A., & de Bono, J.
- Affiliations
- Université Paris-Saclay (FR)
- Essen University Hospital (DE)
- Universitätsmedizin Rostock (DE)
- University Hospital Münster (DE)
- BC Cancer Agency (CA)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- Tulane University (US)
- Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada (US)
- Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- CHU de Québec-Université Laval (CA)
- Radiation Oncology Associates (US)
- Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
- Novartis (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fizazi, Karim
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-06
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 597-610
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10641914
- OpenAlex
- W4378800385
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 9
- FWCI
- 23.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 182 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- The Lancet Oncology (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Novartis
- Advanced Accelerator Applications SA
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- 177Lu-PSMA-617, PSMA radioligand therapy, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, health-related quality of life, pain, FACT-P, EQ-5D-5L, Brief Pain Inventory, treatment-related adverse events
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Bridged-Ring Compounds, Dipeptides, Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring, Humans, Male, Pain, Quality of Life, Receptors, Androgen, Prostate-Specific Antigen, Taxoids, Androgen Receptor Antagonists, Standard of Care, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review