The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prosopis: a global assessment of the biogeography, benefits, impacts and management of one of the world's worst woody invasive plant taxa
Open accessAbstract
Invasive species cause ecological, economic and social impacts and are key drivers of global change. This is the case for the genus Prosopis (mesquite; Fabaceae) where several taxa are among the world's most damaging invasive species. Many contentious issues ('conflicts of interest') surround these taxa, and management interventions have not yet sustainably reduced the negative impacts. There is an urgent need to better understand the factors that drive invasions and shape management actions, and to compare the effectiveness of different management approaches. This paper presents a global review of Prosopis, focusing on its distribution, impacts, benefits and approaches to management. Prosopis was found to occur in a 129 countries globally and many more countries are climatically suitable. All areas with naturalized or invasive Prosopis species at present are suitable for more taxa and many Asian and Mediterranean countries with no records of Prosopis are bioclimatically suitable. Several Prosopis species have substantial impacts on biodiversity, ecosystem services, and local and regional economies in their native and even more so in their invasive ranges; others provide multiple benefits to local communities. Management efforts are underway in only a small part of the invaded range. Countries where more research has been done are more likely to implement formal management than those where little published research is available. Management strategies differ among countries; developed nations use mainly mechanical and chemical control whereas developing nations tend to apply control through utilization approaches. A range of countries are also using biological control. Key gaps in knowledge and promising options for management are highlighted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification
Peel, M. C., Finlayson, B. L., & McMahon, T. A. (2007) · doi:10.5194/hessd-4-439-2007 · Cited by 13,640
Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification
(2007) · doi:10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007 · Cited by 13,640
Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems
Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J., & Melillo, J. M. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5325.494 · Cited by 9,086
(2019) · Encyclopedia of Biological Invasions · doi:10.1525/9780520948433-159 · Cited by 2,280
Pyšek, P., Richardson, D. M., Rejmánek, M., Webster, G. L., Williamson, M., & Kirschner, J. (2004) · TAXON · doi:10.2307/4135498 · Cited by 1,483
Self-citationEconomic and environmental threats of alien plant, animal, and microbe invasions
Pimentel, D., McNair, S., Janecka, J., Wightman, J., Simmonds, C., O’Connell, C., Wong, E., Russel, L., Zern, J., Aquino, T., et al. (2001) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(00)00178-x · Cited by 1,314
Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species – a global review
Richardson, D. M., & Rejmánek, M. (2011) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00782.x · Cited by 1,183
Self-citationGeographical and taxonomic biases in invasion ecology
Pyšek, P., Richardson, D. M., Pergl, J., Jarošík, V., Sixtová, Z., & Weber, E. (2008) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.02.002 · Cited by 818
Self-citationGlobal indicators of biological invasion: species numbers, biodiversity impact and policy responses
McGeoch, M. A., Butchart, S. H. M., Spear, D., Marais, E., Kleynhans, E. J., Symes, A., Chanson, J., & Hoffmann, M. (2010) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00633.x · Cited by 651
Forestry Trees as Invasive Aliens
Richardson, D. M. (1998) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96392.x · Cited by 613
Self-citation
Cited by
The role of invasive alien species in shaping local livelihoods and human well-being: A review
Shackleton, R. T., Shackleton, C. M., & Kull, C. A. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.007 · Cited by 367
Self-citationGlobal effects of non‐native tree species on multiple ecosystem services
Castro‐Díez, P., Vaz, A. S., Silva, J. S., van Loo, M., Alonso, Á., Aponte, C., Bayón, Á., Bellingham, P. J., Chiuffo, M. C., DiManno, N., et al. (2019) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12511 · Cited by 281
Self-citationBrundu, G., & Richardson, D. M. (2016) · NeoBiota · doi:10.3897/neobiota.30.7015 · Cited by 176
Self-citationShackleton, R. T., Biggs, R., Richardson, D. M., & Larson, B. M. H. (2018) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.08.005 · Cited by 91
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Shackleton, R. T., Le Maitre, D. C., Pasiecznik, N. M., & Richardson, D. M.
- Venue
- AoB PLANTS
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-01-01
- Volume
- 6
- ISSN
- 2041-2851 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158932730
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 18.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prosopis: a global assessment of the biogeography, benefits, impacts and management of one of the world's worst woody invasive plant taxa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aobpla/plu027
- The paper
- Shackleton, R. T., Le Maitre, D. C., Pasiecznik, N. M., & Richardson, D. M. (2014). Prosopis: a global assessment of the biogeography, benefits, impacts and management of one of the world's worst woody invasive plant taxa. AoB PLANTS. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plu027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.