The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Restructuring
Abstract
This paper argues for a cognitive psychological approach to second language phenomena that emphasizes the importance of the development of automaticity and the process of restructuring. It is argued that practice can leadimprovement in performance as sub-skills become automated, but it is also possible for increased practice to create conditions for restructuring, with attendant decrements in performance as learners reorganize their internal representational framework. In the second case, performance may follow a U-shaped curve, declining as more complex internal representations replace less complex ones, and increasing again as skill becomes expertise. Examples are drawn from first and second language research, and from research on expert systems. The cognitive approach is not seen as competitive to, but as complementary with, linguistic approaches to second language development.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The proceduralisation of rule-based declarative representations occurs through practice and feedback (Anderson, Corbett, Koedinger and Pelletier, 1995), which together move learners towards a restructuring of interlanguage representations, enabling them to access a better organized representational system (McLaughlin, 1990;Skehan, 1998).”
From Research on form-focused instruction in immersion classrooms: implications for theory and practice (2004) · cites this paper as McLaughlin, 1990
In the citing paper
“Language acquisition does not just rely on integration; it is repeated cycles of integration and differentiation leading to a restructuring of knowledge ~Karmiloff- Smith, 1979Smith, , 1992;;McLaughlin, 1990!+”
From AT THE INTERFACE: DYNAMIC INTERACTIONS OF EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT LANGUAGE KNOWLEDGE (2005) · cites this paper as McLaughlin, 1990
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes
Truscott, J. (1996) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x · Cited by 1,874
Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics
Cameron, L., & Larsen‐Freeman, D. (2007) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00148.x · Cited by 1,345
AT THE INTERFACE: DYNAMIC INTERACTIONS OF EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT LANGUAGE KNOWLEDGE
Ellis, N. C. (2005) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s027226310505014x · Cited by 893
DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF PROMPTS AND RECASTS IN FORM-FOCUSED INSTRUCTION
Lyster, R. (2004) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263104263021 · Cited by 826
Awareness and Second Language Acquisition
Schmidt, R. (1992) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190500002476 · Cited by 825
Metadata
- Authors
- MCLAUGHLIN, B.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
- Corresponding author
- MCLAUGHLIN, B.
- Venue
- Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990-06-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-128
- ISSN
- 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-450X
- OpenAlex
- W4251107408
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 62.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Linguistics (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- second language acquisition, cognitive psychology, restructuring, automaticity, practice, internal representations, U-shaped curve, expertise, expert systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review