Cited by 86Language, Discourse, Communication StrategiesDiscourse Analysis in Language StudiesLinguistics and Discourse Analysis

Deceptive Identity Performance: Offender Moves and Multiple Identities in Online Child Abuse Conversations

Open access
Chiang, Emily, Grant, Tim·2019·Applied Linguistics

Abstract

Abstract This article provides a case study of deceptive online identity performance by a convicted child sex offender. Most prior linguistic and psychological research into online sexual abuse analyses transcripts involving adult decoys posing as children. In contrast, our data comprise genuine online conversations between the offender and 20 victims. Using move analysis (Swales 1981, 1990), we explore the offender’s numerous presented personas. The offender’s use of rhetorical moves is investigated, as is the extent to which the frequency and structure of these moves contribute to and discriminate between the various online personas he adopts. We find from eight frequently adopted personas that two divergent identity positions emerge: the sexual pursuer/aggressor, performed by the majority of his online personas, and the friend/boyfriend, performed by a single persona. Analysis of the offender’s self-describing assertives suggests this distinctive persona shares most attributes with the offender’s ‘home identity’. This article importantly raises the question of whether move analysis might be useful in identifying the ‘offline persona’ in cases where offenders are known to operate multiple online personas in the pursuit of child victims.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/applin/amy007

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Across 10 articles, individuals with a history of OSG and TA-CSA offenses frequently complimented and flattered their victims.

    “Across 10 articles, individuals with a history of OSG and TA-CSA offenses frequently complimented and flattered their victims (Chiang, 2018; Chiang & Grant, 2019; Kloess et al., 2017, 2019; Powell et al., 2021; SeymourSmith & Kloess, 2021; Shannon, 2008; Whittle etal., 2015).”

    From Unraveling the Complexities of Offender Strategies as Part of Online Sexual Grooming and Technology-Assisted Child Sexual Abuse: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Chiang & Grant, 2019

    The ‘Descriptions of prominent shared moves’ section identifies compliments, including sexual compliments, as strategies in the abuse conversations. But the paper studies one offender’s interactions with 20 victims; it does not establish that individuals across the stated offense histories frequently used compliments or flattery. The ‘across 10 articles’ framing belongs to the citing paper’s synthesis, not to this source alone. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The most prevalent form of bribery described across eight articles was monetary exchange.

    “Monetary Exchange. The most prevalent form of bribery described across eight articles was monetary exchange (Chiang, 2018; Chiang & Grant, 2019; De Santisteban et al., 2018; Gámez-Guadix etal., 2018; Kloess etal., 2019; Powell etal., 2021; Shannon, 2008; Whittle etal., 2015).”

    From Unraveling the Complexities of Offender Strategies as Part of Online Sexual Grooming and Technology-Assisted Child Sexual Abuse: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Chiang & Grant, 2019

    The 'Description of prominent offender-only moves' section lists material offers among the offender's overt-persuasion strategies. It does not specify that those offers involved money or establish that monetary exchange was the most prevalent form of bribery. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Three articles discussed how individuals adapted their personas/identities to match their victim's preferences in terms of age, gender, and sexual orientation.

    “Three articles specifically discussed how individuals made use of this strategy and adapted their personas/identities to match their victim's preferences in terms of age, gender, and sexual orientation (Chiang, 2018; Chiang & Grant, 2019; De Santisteban etal., 2018).”

    From Unraveling the Complexities of Offender Strategies as Part of Online Sexual Grooming and Technology-Assisted Child Sexual Abuse: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Chiang & Grant, 2019

    The Description of moves says the offender inquired about victims’ preferences to gauge which persona would be most successful. The Data and Figure 2 sections describe personas varying in age, gender, and sexual orientation, but the passages do not establish that he adapted each of those characteristics to match a particular victim’s preferences. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Five articles reported that individuals sought sympathy when met with resistance to their directive requests.

    “Seeking Sympathy. Five articles reported on findings that individuals sought sympathy when met with resistance to their directive requests (Chiang, 2018; Chiang & Grant, 2019; Kloess etal., 2017, 2019; Whittle etal., 2015).”

    From Unraveling the Complexities of Offender Strategies as Part of Online Sexual Grooming and Technology-Assisted Child Sexual Abuse: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Chiang & Grant, 2019

    The “Description of prominent offender-only moves” section (page not available) identifies seeking sympathy as one strategy the offender used to push victims toward compliance, alongside direct commands. It does not establish that he sought sympathy specifically when victims resisted directive requests. The count of five articles belongs to the citing paper’s summary, not a finding attributed to this source alone. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Individuals with a history of OSG and TA-CSA offenses were observed to make use of false online personas in 10 articles.

    “Individuals with a history of OSG and TACSA offenses were observed to make use of false online personas in 10 articles (Chiang, 2018; Chiang & Grant, 2019; De Santisteban et al., 2018; Gámez-Guadix et al., 2018, 2021; Kloess etal., 2019; Seymour-Smith & Kloess, 2021; Shannon, 2008; K. Thomas etal., 2023; Whittle etal., 2015).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. ¸ar, K. V. 2016. 'Sexual extortion of children in cyberspace,' International Journal of Cyber Criminology 10: 110-26.
  2. Bhatia, V. K. 1993. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. Pearson Education.
  3. Boon, A. 2013. 'Identifying moves in an IMCD ses- sion,' Bulletin of Toyo Gakuen University 21: 219-35.
  4. Boon, A. 2015. 'Learner support and discovery in a virtual non-judgmental environment,' PhD thesis, Aston University.
  5. Bucholtz, M. and K. Hall. 2004. 'Language and identity' in A. Duranti (ed.). A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Blackwell Publishing.
  6. Chiang, E. and T. Grant. 2017. 'Online groom- ing: moves and strategies,' Language and Law / Linguagem e Direito 4: 103-41. Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP). 2013. 'Annual Review 2012-2013 & Centre Plan 2013-2014'. [Online]. Available at https://www.ceop. police.uk/Documents/ceopdocs/AnnualReview CentrePlan2013.pdf. Accessed 14th May 2015.
  7. Craven, S., S. Brown, and E. Gilchrist. 2006. 'Sexual grooming of children: Review of litera- ture and theoretical considerations,' Journal of Sexual Aggression 12: 287-99.
  8. Eneman, M., A. A. Gillespie, and C. S. Bernd. 2010. 'Technology and sexual abuse: A critical review of an Internet grooming case' in ICIS 2010 Proceedings, paper 144. [Online]. Available at http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2010_ submissions/144. Accessed 21 January 2016.
  9. Grant, T., and N. Macleod. (in press). 'Resources and constraints in linguistic identity performance: a theory of authorship,' Language and Law/Linguagem e Direito.
  10. Herring, S. C. 1993. 'Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication,' Electronic Journal of Communication 3: 1-17.
  11. Joseph, J. E. 2004. Language and Identity: National, Ethnic, Religious. Palgrave Macmillan.
  12. Marcum, C. 2007. 'Interpreting the intentions of internet predators: An examination of online predatory behavior,' Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 16: 99-114.
  13. Ospina, M., C. Harstall, and L. Dennett. 2010. Sexual Exploitation of Children and Youth over the Internet: A Rapid Review of the Scientific Literature. Institute of Health Economics. Available at http://www.ihe.ca/advanced-search/sexual-ex- ploitation-of-children-and-youth-over-the-inter- net-a-rapid-review-of-the-scientific-literature.
  14. Samraj, B. and J. M. Gawron. 2015. 'The sui- cide note as a genre: Implications for genre theory,' Journal of English for Academic Purposes 19: 88-101.
  15. Searle, J. R. 1979. Expression and Meaning Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press.
  16. Swales, J. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press.
  17. Swales, J. 2004. Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge University Press.
  18. Tagg, C. 2015. Exploring Digital Communication: Language in Action. Routledge.
  19. Tannen, D. 1992. You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. Virago Press.
  20. Whittle, H. C., C. E. Hamilton-Giachritsis, A. R. Beech, and G. Collings. 2013. 'A review of online grooming: Characteristics and concerns,' Aggression and Violent Behavior 18: 62-70.
  21. Winters, G. M., L. E. Kaylor, and E. L. Jeglic. 2017. 'Sexual offenders contacting children online: An examination of transcripts of sexual grooming,' Journal of Sexual Aggression 23: 62-76.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chiang, E., & Grant, T.
Corresponding author
Chiang, Emily
Venue
Applied Linguistics
Published
2018-03-23
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
675-698
ISSN
  • 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-450X
OpenAlex
W2771071257
Cited by
86
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 3
FWCI
40.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Linguistics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
Keywords
child sexual offenders, online child sexual abuse, move analysis, rhetorical moves, online personas, home identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review