Cited by 140Historical and Modern Theater StudiesPsychological Testing and AssessmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Figural fluency: Differential impairment in patients with left versus right frontal lobe lesions

Ruff, R. M., Allen, C. C., Farrow, C. E., Niemann, H., Wylie, T.·1994·Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

Abstract

Based on an experimental study, Jones-Gotman and Milner demonstrated that patients with right frontal lobe lesions were impaired on design fluency. We sought a clinical adaptation and developed a psychometrically sound technique for design fluency. The present study explores the validity of the Ruff Figural Fluency Test (RFFT) in discriminating patients with either right frontal or nonright frontal lobe lesions. In the first of two studies, six subjects with circumscribed focal lesions were given the RFFT and the Jones-Gotman and Milner figural fluency task. In the second study, we identified a larger sample of 30 patients with focal lesions in the right frontal, left frontal, right posterior, or left posterior cortex. The results from both studies support the validity of the RFFT as a measure which is sensitive to right anterior dysfunction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/arclin/9.1.41

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruff, R. M., Allen, C. C., Farrow, C. E., Niemann, H., & Wylie, T.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Ruff, R. M.
Venue
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
1994-01-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
41-55
ISSN
  • 0887-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-5843
OpenAlex
W2095588412
Cited by
140
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
figural fluency, non-verbal fluency, Ruff Figural Fluency Test, hemispheric lateralization, neuropsychological assessment validity, focal brain lesions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review