Cited by 6Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychological Testing and AssessmentDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Figural fluency and immediate visual memory in patients with at‐risk mental state for psychosis: empirical study

Pawełczyk, Agnieszka, Kotlicka‐Antczak, Magdalena, Rabe‐Jabłońska, Jolanta, Pawełczyk, Tomasz, Ruszpel, Anna, Łojek, Emila·2015·Early Intervention in Psychiatry

Abstract

Aim: Although a number of cognitive functions have been assessed in the ultra‐high risk (UHR) population, only one study has reported on figural fluency. Visual memory was measured by different tests providing inconsistent results. The aim of the present study was to compare figural fluency and visual immediate memory performance in UHR patients and normal subjects. Methods: The UHR sample consisted of 55 help‐seeking individuals meeting CAARMS criteria. The control group consisted of 65 subjects. They were matched as a group by age, gender and education level. Figural fluency (RFFT) and immediate visual memory (BVRT) were assessed within 2 weeks after inclusion in the study in the UHR patient group. Results: Significant differences were obtained in RFFT and BVRT results. In BVRT, UHR patients scored lower in number of correct designs (P < 0.001) and higher in number of errors (P < 0.0001), especially omissions (P < 0.001) and distortions (P < 0.0001). UHR subjects accurately recalled fewer designs, omitted and distorted more test figures. In RFFT, they scored lower in production of novel designs (P < 0.0001) and higher in the error ratio index (P < 0.008). They produced fewer novel designs and made more preservative errors. Conclusions: The current study concerns non‐verbal cognitive functions in UHR samples. Our results suggest that figural fluency and visual immediate memory are impaired in help‐seeking UHR individuals as compared with matched controls.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/eip.12116

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pawełczyk, A., Kotlicka‐Antczak, M., Rabe‐Jabłońska, J., Pawełczyk, T., Ruszpel, A., & Łojek, E.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of Lodz (PL)
  • University of Warsaw (PL)
  • Department of Cognitive Neuropsychology University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland
Corresponding author
Pawełczyk, Agnieszka
Venue
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-12-24
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
324-330
ISSN
  • 1751-7885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7893
OpenAlex
W2163438913
Cited by
6
References
51
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Early Intervention in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
clinical high risk for psychosis, figural fluency, CAARMS, design production
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotic Disorders, Risk Factors, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review