Cited by 33Animal Behavior and ReproductionAvian ecology and behaviorEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Aerodynamic costs of long tails in male barn swallows Hirundo rustica and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism

Barbosa, A.·1999·Behavioral Ecology

Abstract

Exaggerated tail feathers of birds constitute a standard example of evolution of extravagant characters due to sexual selection. Such secondary sexual traits are assumed to be costly to produce and maintain, and they usually are accompanied by morphological adaptations that tend to reduce their costs. The aerodynamic costs for male barn swallows Hirundo rustica of having long tails were quantified using aerodynamics theory applied to morphological data from seven European populations. Latitudinal differences in tail length were positively correlated with differences in flight costs predicted by aerodynamics theory. A positive relationship between aerodynamic costs of long tails and the degree of sexual size dimorphism was found among populations. Latitudinal differences in foraging costs may result in tail length being relatively similar in males and females in southern populations, whereas the low foraging costs for males in northern populations may allow them to cope with higher aerodynamic costs, giving rise to large sexual size dimorphism. Enlargement of wingspan in males can alleviate but not eliminate the costs of tail exaggeration, and therefore differences in aerodynamic costs of male ornaments were maintained among populations. Sexual size dimorphism in the barn swallow arises as a consequence of latitudinal differences in the advantages of sexual selection for males and the costs of long tails for males and females.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/beheco/10.2.128

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies have made inferences about the costs of carrying exaggerated traits by either removing or artificially exaggerating them further.

    “Several studies have made inferences about the costs of carrying exaggerated traits by either removing or artificially exaggerating them further51516171819.”
  • Previous studies in birds have tended to focus on the influence of sexually selected traits during flight rather than terrestrial locomotion.

    “Previous studies in birds have tended to focus on the influence of sexually selected traits during flight rather than terrestrial locomotion51516171819.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barbosa, A.
Corresponding author
Barbosa, A.
Venue
Behavioral Ecology
Published
1999-03-01
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
128-135
ISSN
  • 1045-2249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-7279
OpenAlex
W2168985544
Cited by
33
References
63
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
Hirundo rustica, tail length, sexual size dimorphism, sexual selection, flight costs, latitudinal variation, wing span, foraging costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review