The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Parentage and the evolution of parental behavior
Open accessAbstract
Parentage is the proportion of juveniles in a brood that are offspring of potential care givers. We analyzed how reductions in parentage affect the evolution of parental behavior using a static optimization model. The main benefit of parental effort was an increase in the survival of offspring, and the main costs were reduced opportunities to seek additional matings or to parasitize neighbors and or reduced survival. Both the costs and benefits included terms for relatedness to young. The effect of parentage depended on (1) whether parents responded in ecological time (facultative response) or in evolutionary time (nonfacultative response), (2) whether the cues enabling assessment of parentage permitted discrimination among offspring, and (3) whether parentage was the same among different groups of juveniles (unrestricted) or varied between them (restricted). When parents did not know their own parentage and mean parentage was the same for all matings, reduced parentage affected the costs and benefits equally, so, as in several previous models, there was no effect on the optimal level of parental effort. Parentage did affect optimal parental effort when mean parentage to the present brood differed from that to young from alternative or future matings. Lowered parentage reduced optimal parental effort when the cost of parenting was missed opportunities for extrapair copulations or brood parasitism or when parentage was consistently higher in alternative or future matings. Nonlinear changes in parentage with age gave complex trajectories of parental care, with individuals of different ages having similar parentage but exhibiting different levels of parental effort. Correlations between parentage and other variables in the model (such as opportunities for additional matings) sometimes masked, but never eliminated, the effects of parentage. When parents could discriminate their own young in a brood, overall parental effort was reduced, but nepotism was increased. When parents could not discriminate their own offspring but had general cues about average parentage to the brood, effects varied depending on the costs and benefits of parental behavior. When parental behavior was costly to care givers, parentage had more effect than when parenting was not costly. Likewise, parentage had less effect when care greatly increased offspring survival than when care was less necessary. Our analyses reconcile conflicting results from previous models and suggest a general framework for analyzing parental behavior within populations and among higher taxonomic groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
Parental Investment and Sexual Selection
(2017) · Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man · doi:10.4324/9781315129266-7 · Cited by 9,510
Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man: The Darwinian Pivot
(2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315129266 · Cited by 7,252
The Evolution of Social Behavior
Alexander, R. D. (1974) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.001545 · Cited by 3,854
Natural Selection, the Costs of Reproduction, and a Refinement of Lack's Principle
Williams, G. C. (1966) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282461 · Cited by 3,276
The Evolution of Parental Care
CLUTTON-BROCK, T. H. (2019) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvs32ssj · Cited by 3,128
Williams, G. C. (1975) · PubMed · Cited by 2,177
Life Historical Consequences of Natural Selection
Gadgil, M., & Bossert, W. H. (1970) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282637 · Cited by 1,660
Quadagno, J. S., & Alexander, R. D. (1981) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2067427 · Cited by 1,179
Sperm Competition in Birds: Evolutionary Causes and Consequences
Birkhead, T. R., & Møller, A. P. (1992) · Cited by 1,109
Cited by
Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection
Møller, A. P. (1998) · Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection · doi:10.1016/b978-012100543-6/50027-1 · Cited by 2,074
Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios
KOKKO, H., & JENNIONS, M. D. (2008) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01540.x · Cited by 982
Evolution and proximate expression of human paternal investment.
Geary, D. C. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.126.1.55 · Cited by 835
Extra-Pair Paternity in Birds: Causes, Correlates, and Conflict
Westneat, D. F., & Stewart, I. R. K. (2003) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132439 · Cited by 687
Self-citationThe function of nuptial feeding in insects: a review of empirical studies
VAHED, K. (1998) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1997.tb00025.x · Cited by 645
Metadata
- Authors
- Westneat, D. F., & Sherman, P. W.
- Venue
- Behavioral Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 66-77
- ISSN
- 1045-2249 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7279
- OpenAlex
- W2165467442
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 29.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parentage and the evolution of parental behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/beheco/4.1.66
- The paper
- Westneat, D. F., & Sherman, P. W. (1993). Parentage and the evolution of parental behavior. Behavioral Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/4.1.66
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.