The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-organized aerial displays of thousands of starlings: a model
Open accessAbstract
Through combining theoretical models and empirical data, complexity science has increased our understanding of social behavior of animals, in particular of social insects, primates, and fish. What are missing are studies of collective behavior of huge swarms of birds. Recently detailed empirical data have been collected of the swarming maneuvers of large flocks of thousands of starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) at their communal sleeping site (roost). Their flocking maneuvers are of dazzling complexity in their changes in density and flock shape, but the processes underlying them are still a mystery. Recent models show that flocking may arise by self-organization from rules of co-ordination with nearby neighbors, but patterns in these models come nowhere near the complexity of those of the real starlings. The question of this paper, therefore, is whether such complex patterns can emerge by self-organization. In our computer model, called StarDisplay, we combine the usual rules of co-ordination based on separation, attraction, and alignment with specifics of starling behavior: 1) simplified aerodynamics of flight, especially rolling during turning, 2) movement above a “roosting area” (sleeping site), and 3) the low fixed number of interaction neighbors (i.e., the topological range). Our model generates patterns that resemble remarkably not only qualitative but also quantitative empirical data collected in Rome through video recordings and position measurements by stereo photography. Our results provide new insights into the mechanisms underlying complex flocking maneuvers of starlings and other birds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hamilton, W. D. (1971) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(71)90189-5 · Cited by 3,506
Self-Organization in Biological Systems
Sneyd, J., Theraula, G., Bonabeau, E., Deneubourg, J.-L., & Franks, N. R. (2001) · doi:10.1515/9780691212920 · Cited by 2,949
Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move
Couzin, I. D., Krause, J., Franks, N. R., & Levin, S. A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03236 · Cited by 2,753
Thought Transference (or What ?) in Birds
(1932) · Nature · doi:10.1038/129263c0 · Cited by 57 · cited 2×
“attributed to ‘thought transference’ (Selous, 1931).”
Background
Cited by
Vicsek, T., & Zafeiris, A. (2012) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.03.004 · Cited by 2,923
How perceived threat increases synchronization in collectively moving animal groups
Bode, N. W. F., Faria, J. J., Franks, D. W., Krause, J., & Wood, A. J. (2010) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0855 · Cited by 154
Learning to flock through reinforcement
Durve, M., Peruani, F., & Celani, A. (2020) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.102.012601 · Cited by 58
Mills, R., Hildenbrandt, H., Taylor, G. K., & Hemelrijk, C. K. (2018) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006044 · Cited by 30
Self-citationSimple movement rules result in ideal free distribution of mobile pastoralists
Moritz, M., Hamilton, I. M., Yoak, A. J., Scholte, P., Cronley, J., Maddock, P., & Pi, H. (2015) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.03.010 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Hildenbrandt, H., Carere, C., & Hemelrijk, C. K.
- Venue
- Behavioral Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1349-1359
- ISSN
- 1045-2249 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7279
- OpenAlex
- W2155084532
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 19.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-organized aerial displays of thousands of starlings: a model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/beheco/arq149
- The paper
- Hildenbrandt, H., Carere, C., & Hemelrijk, C. K. (2010). Self-organized aerial displays of thousands of starlings: a model. Behavioral Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arq149
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.