Cited by 883Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical ResearchBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

The UCSC genome browser and associated tools

Open access
Kuhn, R. M., Haussler, D., Kent, W. J.·2013·Briefings in Bioinformatics

Abstract

The UCSC Genome Browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu) is a graphical viewer for genomic data now in its 13th year. Since the early days of the Human Genome Project, it has presented an integrated view of genomic data of many kinds. Now home to assemblies for 58 organisms, the Browser presents visualization of annotations mapped to genomic coordinates. The ability to juxtapose annotations of many types facilitates inquiry-driven data mining. Gene predictions, mRNA alignments, epigenomic data from the ENCODE project, conservation scores from vertebrate whole-genome alignments and variation data may be viewed at any scale from a single base to an entire chromosome. The Browser also includes many other widely used tools, including BLAT, which is useful for alignments from high-throughput sequencing experiments. Private data uploaded as Custom Tracks and Data Hubs in many formats may be displayed alongside the rich compendium of precomputed data in the UCSC database. The Table Browser is a full-featured graphical interface, which allows querying, filtering and intersection of data tables. The Saved Session feature allows users to store and share customized views, enhancing the utility of the system for organizing multiple trains of thought. Binary Alignment/Map (BAM), Variant Call Format and the Personal Genome Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) data formats are useful for visualizing a large sequencing experiment (whole-genome or whole-exome), where the differences between the data set and the reference assembly may be displayed graphically. Support for high-throughput sequencing extends to compact, indexed data formats, such as BAM, bigBed and bigWig, allowing rapid visualization of large datasets from RNA-seq and ChIP-seq experiments via local hosting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bib/bbs038

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Imputed genetic variants were filtered for INFO > 0.7 and chromosome positions were lifted to the hg38 build using LiftOver.

    “Imputed genetic variants were filtered for INFO > 0.7 and chromosome positions were lifted to the hg38 build using LiftOver 58 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. [2]Fujita PA Rhead B Zweig AS The UCSC Genome Browser database: update 2011 Nucleic Acids Res 2011 39 D876 82 20959295 PMC3242726
  2. [3]Dreszer TR Karolchik D Zweig AS The UCSC Genome Browser database: extensions and updates 2011 Nucleic Acids Res 2012 40 D918 23 22086951 PMC3245018
  3. [4]Kuhn RM Karolchik D Zweig AS The UCSC Genome Browser Database: update 2009 Nucleic Acids Res 2009 37 D755 61 18996895 PMC2686463
  4. [5]Rhead B Karolchik D Kuhn RM The UCSC Genome Browser database: update 2010 Nucleic Acids Res 2010 38 D613 9 19906737 PMC2808870
  5. [6]Flicek P Amode MR Barrell D Ensembl 2012 Nucleic Acids Res 2012 40 D84 90 22086963 PMC3245178
  6. [7]Stein LD Mungall C Shu S The generic genome browser: a building block for a model organism system database Genome Res 2002 12 1599 610 12368253 PMC187535
  7. [8]Robinson JT Thorvaldsdóttir H Winckler W Integrative genomics viewer Nature Biotechnology 2011 29 24 6 PMC3346182 21221095
  8. [9]Kent WJ Haussler D Assembly of the working draft of the human genome with GigAssembler Genome Res 2001 11 1541 8 11544197 PMC311095
  9. [10]The International Human Genome Mapping Consortium. A physical map of the human genome Nature 2001 409 934 41 11237014
  10. [11]Pruitt KD Katz KS Sicotte H Introducing RefSeq and LocusLink: curated human genome resources at the NCBI Trends Genet 2000 16 44 7 10637631
  11. [12]Flicek P Aken BL Ballester B Ensembl’s 10th year Nucleic Acids Res 2010 38 D557 62 19906699 PMC2808936
  12. [13]Kent WJ Zahler AM The intronerator: exploring introns and alternative splicing in Caenorhabditis elegans Nucleic Acids Res 2000 28 91 3 10592190 PMC102389
  13. [14]Jurka J Kapitonov VV Pavlicek A Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements Cytogenet. Genome Res 2005 110 462 7 16093699
  14. [15]Benson DA Karsch-Mizrachi I Lipman DJ GenBank Nucleic Acids Res 2011 39 D32 7 21071399 PMC3013681
  15. [16]Gross S Brent MR Using multiple alignments to improve gene prediction J Comput Biol 2006 13 379 93 16597247
  16. [17]Flicek P Amode MR Barrell D Ensembl 2011 Nucleic Acids Res 2011 39 D800 6 21045057 PMC3013672
  17. [18]Hsu F Kent WJ Clawson H The UCSC Known Genes Bioinformatics 2006 22 1036 46 16500937
  18. [19]Kent WJ BLAT–the BLAST-like alignment tool Genome Res 2002 12 656 64 11932250 PMC187518
  19. [20]Kent WJ Baertsch R Hinrichs A Evolution’s cauldron: duplication, deletion, and rearrangement in the mouse and human genomes Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003 100 11484 9 14500911 PMC208784
  20. [22]Blanchette M Kent WJ Riemer C Aligning multiple genomic sequences with the threaded blockset aligner Genome Res 2004 14 708 15 15060014 PMC383317
  21. [24]Siepel A Pollard KS Haussler D New methods for detecting lineage-specific selection Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Research in Computational Molecular Biology (RECOMB 2006) 2006 3909 190 205
  22. [25]Iafrate AJ Feuk L Rivera MN Detection of large-scale variation in the human genome Nature Genetics 2004 36 949 51 15286789
  23. [26]Firth HV Richards SM Bevan AP DECIPHER: Database of Chromosomal Imbalance and Phenotype in Humans Using Ensembl Resources Am J Hum Genet 2009 84 524 33 19344873 PMC2667985
  24. [27]Su AI Wiltshire T Batalov S A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004 101 6062 7 15075390 PMC395923
  25. [28]Bailey JA Gu Z Clark RA Recent segmental duplications in the human genome Science 2002 297 1003 7 12169732
  26. [29]Raney BJ Cline MS Rosenbloom KR ENCODE whole-genome data in the UCSC genome browser (2011 update) Nucleic Acids Res 2011 39 D871 5 21037257 PMC3013645
  27. [30]Sherry S Ward M-H Kholodov M dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation Nucleic Acids Res 2001 29 308 311 11125122 PMC29783
  28. [31]Amberger J Bocchini CA Scott AF McKusick’s Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM®) Nucleic Acids Res 2009 37 D793 6 18842627 PMC2686440
  29. [32]Bernstein BE Stamatoyannopoulos JA Costello JF The NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Mapping Consortium Nature Biotechnology 2010 28 1045 8 PMC3607281 20944595
  30. [33]ENCODE Consortium. The ENCODE (ENCyclopedia Of DNA Elements) Project Science 2004 306 636 40 15499007
  31. [34]The ENCODE Project Consortium Birney E Stamatoyannopoulos J Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project Nature 2007 447 799 816 17571346 PMC2212820
  32. [35]Safran M Chalifa-Caspi V Shmueli O Human gene-centric databases at the Weizmann Institute of Science: GeneCards, UDB, CroW 21 and HORDE Nucleic Acids Res 2003 31 142 6 12519968 PMC165497
  33. [36]Pagon RA Tarczy-Hornoch P Baskin PK GeneTests-GeneClinics: genetic testing information for a growing audience Human Mutation 2002 19 501 9 11968082
  34. [37]Bruford EA Lush MJ Wright MW The HGNC Database in 2008: a resource for the human genome Nucleic Acids Res 2008 36 D445 8 17984084 PMC2238870
  35. [38]Bult CJ Eppig JT Kadin JA The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): mouse biology and model systems Nucleic Acids Res 2008 36 D724 8 18158299 PMC2238849
  36. [39]The UniProt Consortium. The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) in 2010 Nucleic Acids Res 2010 38 D142 8 19843607 PMC2808944
  37. [41]Kent WJ Zweig AS Barber G BigWig and BigBed: enabling browsing of large distributed datasets Bioinformatics 2010 26 2204 7 20639541 PMC2922891
  38. [43]Danecek P Auton A Abecasis G The variant call format and VCFtools Bioinformatics 2011 27 2156 8 21653522 PMC3137218
  39. [44]Kaiser J A plan to capture human diversity in 1000 genomes Science 2008 319 395 18218868
  40. [45]Feuk L Carson AR Scherer SW Structural variation in the human genome Nature Rev Genet 2006 7 85 97 16418744
  41. [46]Church DM Lappalainen I Sneddon TP Public data archives for genomic structural variation Nature Genetics 2010 42 813 4 20877315 PMC3169170
  42. [47]Cooper GM Coe BP Girirajan S A copy number variation morbidity map of developmental delay Nature Genetics 2011 43 838 46 21841781 PMC3171215
  43. [48]McLaren W Pritchard B Rios D Deriving the consequences of genomic variants with the Ensembl API and SNP Effect Predictor Bioinformatics 2010 26 2069 70 20562413 PMC2916720
  44. [49]Genome 10K Community of Scientists Genome 10 K: A Proposal to Obtain Whole-Genome Sequence for 10,000 Vertebrate Species J Hered 2009 100 659 74 19892720 PMC2877544

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuhn, R. M., Haussler, D., & Kent, W. J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Kuhn, R. M.
Venue
Briefings in Bioinformatics
Published
2012-08-20
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
144-161
ISSN
  • 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-4054
OpenAlex
W2132522861
Cited by
883
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 106 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 1
FWCI
12.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Briefings in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (P01HG005062, U01HG004695, P41HG002371, U41HG004269, U41HG004568)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (U01ES017154)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (U01DE020057)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (RC2HD064525)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
UCSC Genome Browser, genome visualization, genome annotation, blat, variant visualization, conservation scores, whole-genome alignment, high-throughput sequencing data, RNA-seq, ChIP-seq, data mining
MeSH terms
Animals, Computer Graphics, Data Display, Humans, Software, Information Storage and Retrieval, Sequence Alignment, Computational Biology, Internet, Genomics, Databases, Genetic, Data Mining, Search Engine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review