Cited by 453Fungal and yeast genetics researchDNA Repair MechanismsBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Rewiring of Genetic Networks in Response to DNA Damage

Open access
Bandyopadhyay, Sourav, Mehta, Monika, Kuo, Dwight, Sung, Min-Kyung, Chuang, Ryan, Jaehnig, Eric J., Bodenmiller, Bernd, Licon, Katherine +13 more·2010·Science

Abstract

DNA Damage Pathways Revealed: Despite the dynamic nature of cellular responses, the genetic networks that govern these responses have been mapped primarily as static snapshots. Bandyopadhyay et al. (p. 1385 ; see the Perspective by Friedman and Schuldiner ) report a comparison of large genetic interactomes measured among all yeast kinases, phosphatases, and transcription factors, as the cell responded to DNA damage. The interactomes revealed were highly dynamic structures that changed dramatically with changing conditions. These dynamic interactions reveal genetic relationships that can be more effective than classical “static” interactions (for example, synthetic lethals and epistasis maps) in identifying pathways of interest.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1195618

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [20]Papamichos-Chronakis M Krebs JE Peterson CL Genes Dev 20 2437 2006 16951256 PMC1560417
  2. [24]Begley TJ Rosenbach AS Ideker T Samson LD Mol Cancer Res 1 103 2002 12496357

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bandyopadhyay, S., Mehta, M., Kuo, D., Sung, M.-K., Chuang, R., Jaehnig, E. J., Bodenmiller, B., Licon, K., Copeland, W., Shales, M., Fiedler, D., Dutkowski, J., Guénolé, A., van Attikum, H., Shokat, K. M., Kolodner, R. D., Huh, W.-K., Aebersold, R., Keogh, M.-C., Krogan, N. J., & Ideker, T.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • Department of Toxicogenetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Corresponding author
  • Keogh, Michael-Christopher
  • Krogan, Nevan J.
  • Ideker, Trey
Venue
Science
Published
2010-12-03
Volume
330
Issue
6009
Pages
1385-1389
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1988263223
Cited by
447
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 41
FWCI
15.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA013330)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM084448, P50GM081879, R01GM084279, R37GM026017, R01GM026017)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES014811)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
DNA damage response, genetic interaction networks, phosphatase, transcription factors, DNA repair pathways, protein complex stability, network rewiring
MeSH terms
Chromatin, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, DNA, Fungal, Epistasis, Genetic, Genes, Fungal, Histones, Methyl Methanesulfonate, Mutagens, Mutation, Phosphoprotein Phosphatases, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Transcription Factors, Signal Transduction, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases, Protein Interaction Mapping, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Gene Regulatory Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review