The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies.
Open accessAbstract
MOTIVATION: A new hidden Markov model method (SAM-T98) for finding remote homologs of protein sequences is described and evaluated. The method begins with a single target sequence and iteratively builds a hidden Markov model (HMM) from the sequence and homologs found using the HMM for database search. SAM-T98 is also used to construct model libraries automatically from sequences in structural databases. METHODS: We evaluate the SAM-T98 method with four datasets. Three of the test sets are fold-recognition tests, where the correct answers are determined by structural similarity. The fourth uses a curated database. The method is compared against WU-BLASTP and against DOUBLE-BLAST, a two-step method similar to ISS, but using BLAST instead of FASTA. RESULTS: SAM-T98 had the fewest errors in all tests-dramatically so for the fold-recognition tests. At the minimum-error point on the SCOP (Structural Classification of Proteins)-domains test, SAM-T98 got 880 true positives and 68 false positives, DOUBLE-BLAST got 533 true positives with 71 false positives, and WU-BLASTP got 353 true positives with 24 false positives. The method is optimized to recognize superfamilies, and would require parameter adjustment to be used to find family or fold relationships. One key to the performance of the HMM method is a new score-normalization technique that compares the score to the score with a reversed model rather than to a uniform null model. AVAILABILITY: A World Wide Web server, as well as information on obtaining the Sequence Alignment and Modeling (SAM) software suite, can be found at http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/research/compbi o/ CONTACT: karplus@cse.ucsc.edu; http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/karplus
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
<tt>BLAT</tt> —The <tt>BLAST</tt> -Like Alignment Tool
Kent, W. J. (2002) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.229202 · Cited by 8,480
Accelerated Profile HMM Searches
Eddy, S. R. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 · Cited by 6,975
MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets
Steinegger, M., & Söding, J. (2017) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3988 · Cited by 4,840
I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction
Zhang, Y. (2008) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-40 · Cited by 5,124
HHblits: lightning-fast iterative protein sequence searching by HMM-HMM alignment
Remmert, M., Biegert, A., Hauser, A., & Söding, J. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1818 · Cited by 2,288
PROSITE: a documented database using patterns and profiles as motif descriptors
Sigrist, C. J. A. (2002) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/3.3.265 · Cited by 913
Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER
Webb, B., & Sali, A. (2016) · Current Protocols in Protein Science · doi:10.1002/cpps.20 · Cited by 730
“For example, SAM-T08 makes use of the predicted local structure for the target sequence to enhance homolog detection and alignment accuracy (Karplus et al., 2003).”
MethodGenome-wide analysis of core cell cycle genes in Arabidopsis
Vandepoele, K., Raes, J., De Veylder, L., Rouzé, P., Rombauts, S., & Inzé, D. (2002) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.010445 · Cited by 594
Comparing two K-category assignments by a K-category correlation coefficient
Gorodkin, J. (2004) · Computational Biology and Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2004.09.006 · Cited by 545
Learning generative models for protein fold families
Balakrishnan, S., Kamisetty, H., Carbonell, J. G., Lee, S., & Langmead, C. J. (2011) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22934 · Cited by 316
The evolution and structure prediction of coiled coils across all genomes.
Rackham, O. J. L., Madera, M., Armstrong, C. T., Vincent, T. L., Woolfson, D. N., & Gough, J. (2010) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2010.08.032 · Cited by 97
Kumar, L., Brenner, N., Sledzieski, S., Olaosebikan, M., Roger, L. M., Lynn-Goin, M., Klein-Seetharaman, R., Berger, B., Putnam, H., Yang, J., et al. (2023) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0270965 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Karplus, K., Barrett, C., & Hughey, R.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-01-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 846-856
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2140244239
- Cited by
- 1,102
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.