The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methods for assessing reproducibility of clustering patterns observed in analyses of microarray data
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Recent technological advances such as cDNA microarray technology have made it possible to simultaneously interrogate thousands of genes in a biological specimen. A cDNA microarray experiment produces a gene expression ‘profile’. Often interest lies in discovering novel subgroupings, or ‘clusters’, of specimens based on their profiles, for example identification of new tumor taxonomies. Cluster analysis techniques such as hierarchical clustering and self-organizing maps have frequently been used for investigating structure in microarray data. However, clustering algorithms always detect clusters, even on random data, and it is easy to misinterpret the results without some objective measure of the reproducibility of the clusters. Results: We present statistical methods for testing for overall clustering of gene expression profiles, and we define easily interpretable measures of cluster-specific reproducibility that facilitate understanding of the clustering structure. We apply these methods to elucidate structure in cDNA microarray gene expression profiles obtained on melanoma tumors and on prostate specimens. Availability: Software to implement these methods is contained in BRB ArrayTools microarray analysis package available from http://linus.nci.nih.gov./BRB-ArrayTools.html Contact: lm5h@nih.gov * To whom correspondence should be addressed. † Present address: Human Genome Sciences Inc., Rockville, MD 20850, USA
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating the Number of Clusters in a Data Set Via the Gap Statistic
Tibshirani, R., Walther, G., & Hastie, T. (2001) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00293 · Cited by 6,205
Cited by
Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes Respond Differently to Preoperative Chemotherapy
Rouzier, R., Perou, C. M., Symmans, W. F., Ibrahim, N., Cristofanilli, M., Anderson, K., Hess, K. R., Stec, J., Ayers, M., Wagner, P., et al. (2005) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-04-2421 · Cited by 1,891
Is My Network Module Preserved and Reproducible?
Langfelder, P., Luo, R., Oldham, M. C., & Horvath, S. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001057 · Cited by 1,012
Systematic evaluation of objective functions for predicting intracellular fluxes in Escherichia coli
Schuetz, R., Kuepfer, L., & Sauer, U. (2007) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb4100162 · Cited by 677
Latent Bone Metastasis in Breast Cancer Tied to Src-Dependent Survival Signals
Zhang, X. H.-F., Wang, Q., Gerald, W., Hudis, C. A., Norton, L., Smid, M., Foekens, J. A., & Massagué, J. (2009) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2009.05.017 · Cited by 663
WNT/TCF Signaling through LEF1 and HOXB9 Mediates Lung Adenocarcinoma Metastasis
Nguyen, D. X., Chiang, A. C., Zhang, X. H.-F., Kim, J. Y., Kris, M. G., Ladanyi, M., Gerald, W. L., & Massagué, J. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.030 · Cited by 613
Metadata
- Authors
- McShane, L. M., Radmacher, M. D., Freidlin, B., Yu, R., Li, M.-C., & Simon, R.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-11-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1462-1469
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2102330962
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methods for assessing reproducibility of clustering patterns observed in analyses of microarray data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/18.11.1462
- The paper
- McShane, L. M., Radmacher, M. D., Freidlin, B., Yu, R., Li, M.-C., & Simon, R. (2002). Methods for assessing reproducibility of clustering patterns observed in analyses of microarray data. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/18.11.1462
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.