Cited by 12Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

STRPsearch: fast detection of structured tandem repeat proteins

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Motivation: Structured Tandem Repeats Proteins (STRPs) constitute a subclass of tandem repeats characterized by repetitive structural motifs. These proteins exhibit distinct secondary structures that form repetitive tertiary arrangements, often resulting in large molecular assemblies. Despite highly variable sequences, STRPs can perform important and diverse biological functions, maintaining a consistent structure with a variable number of repeat units. With the advent of protein structure prediction methods, millions of 3D models of proteins are now publicly available. However, automatic detection of STRPs remains challenging with current state-of-the-art tools due to their lack of accuracy and long execution times, hindering their application on large datasets. In most cases, manual curation remains the most accurate method for detecting and classifying STRPs, making it impracticable to annotate millions of structures. Results: We introduce STRPsearch, a novel tool for the rapid identification, classification, and mapping of STRPs. Leveraging manually curated entries from RepeatsDB as the known conformational space of STRPs, STRPsearch uses the latest advances in structural alignment for a fast and accurate detection of repeated structural motifs in proteins, followed by an innovative approach to map units and insertions through the generation of TM-score profiles. STRPsearch is highly scalable, efficiently processing large datasets, and can be applied to both experimental structures and predicted models. In addition, it demonstrates superior performance compared to existing tools, offering researchers a reliable and comprehensive solution for STRP analysis across diverse proteomes. Availability and implementation: STRPsearch is coded in Python. All scripts and associated documentation are available from: https://github.com/BioComputingUP/STRPsearch.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae690

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Altschul, 1990, Basic local alignment search tool, J Mol Biol, 215, 403, 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Arrías, 2023, The repetitive structure of DNA clamps: an overlooked protein tandem repeat, J Struct Biol, 215, 108001, 10.1016/j.jsb.2023.108001 · DOI
  3. Brunette, 2015, Exploring the repeat protein universe through computational protein design, Nature, 528, 580, 10.1038/nature16162 · DOI
  4. Clementel, 2024, RepeatsDB in 2025: expanding annotations of structured tandem repeats proteins on AlphaFoldDB, Nucleic Acids Res, 10.1093/nar/gkae965 · DOI
  5. de Wit, 2011, Role of leucine-rich repeat proteins in the development and function of neural circuits, Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 27, 697, 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154111 · DOI
  6. Delucchi, 2021, TRAL 2.0: tandem repeat detection with circular profile hidden Markov models and evolutionary aligner, Front Bioinform, 1, 691865, 10.3389/fbinf.2021.691865 · DOI
  7. Delucchi, 2020, A new census of protein tandem repeats and their relationship with intrinsic disorder, Genes (Basel), 11, 407, 10.3390/genes11040407 · DOI
  8. Di Domenico, 2014, RepeatsDB: a database of tandem repeat protein structures, Nucleic Acids Res, 42, D352, 10.1093/nar/gkt1175 · DOI
  9. Do Viet, 2015, TAPO: a combined method for the identification of tandem repeats in protein structures, FEBS Lett, 589, 2611, 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.08.025 · DOI
  10. Fournier, 2013, Functional and genomic analyses of alpha-solenoid proteins, PLoS One, 8, e79894, 10.1371/journal.pone.0079894 · DOI
  11. Hirsh, 2018, RepeatsDB-lite: a web server for unit annotation of tandem repeat proteins, Nucleic Acids Res, 46, W402, 10.1093/nar/gky360 · DOI
  12. Höcker, 2014, Design of proteins from smaller fragments—learning from evolution, Curr Opin Struct Biol, 27, 56, 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.04.007 · DOI
  13. Kajava, 2012, Tandem repeats in proteins: from sequence to structure, J Struct Biol, 179, 279, 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.08.009 · DOI
  14. Kajava, 2018, Editorial for special issue “proteins with tandem repeats: sequences, structures and functions”, J Struct Biol, 201, 86, 10.1016/j.jsb.2017.12.011 · DOI
  15. Kamel, 2021, REP2: a web server to detect common tandem repeats in protein sequences, J Mol Biol, 433, 166895, 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.166895 · DOI
  16. Monzon, 2023, A STRP-ed definition of structured tandem repeats in proteins, J Struct Biol, 215, 108023, 10.1016/j.jsb.2023.108023 · DOI
  17. Varadi, 2022, AlphaFold protein structure database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models, Nucleic Acids Res, 50, D439, 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Wu, 2023, De novo design of modular peptide-binding proteins by superhelical matching, Nature, 616, 581, 10.1038/s41586-023-05909-9 · DOI
  19. Zhang, 2005, TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score, Nucleic Acids Res, 33, 2302, 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Mozaffari, S., Arrías, P. N., Clementel, D., Piovesan, D., Ferrari, C., Tosatto, S. C. E., & Monzon, A. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Department of Information Engineering, University of Padua , Padova 35121,
Corresponding author
Tosatto, Silvio C E
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2024-11-18
Volume
40
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W4404509638
Cited by
12
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (823886)
  • European Cooperation in Science and Technology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
protein secondary structure, structural alignment, protein structure annotation, protein tertiary structure
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Tandem Repeat Sequences, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review