Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 11,495

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research

Open access
Conesa, Ana, Götz, Stefan, García-Gómez, Juan Miguel, Terol, Javier, Talón, Manuel, Robles, Montserrat·2005·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Summary: We present here Blast2GO (B2G), a research tool designed with the main purpose of enabling Gene Ontology (GO) based data mining on sequence data for which no GO annotation is yet available. B2G joints in one application GO annotation based on similarity searches with statistical analysis and highlighted visualization on directed acyclic graphs. This tool offers a suitable platform for functional genomics research in non-model species. B2G is an intuitive and interactive desktop application that allows monitoring and comprehension of the whole annotation and analysis process. Availability: Blast2GO is freely available via Java Web Start at http://www.blast2go.de Supplementary material: http://www.blast2go.de -> Evaluation Contact: aconesa@ivia.es; stefang@fis.upv.es

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti610

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Al-Shahrour, F., et al. 2004FatiGO: a web tool for finding significant associations of Gene Ontology terms with groups of genes. Bioinformatics20578–580 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Blüthgen, N., Brand, K., Cajavec, B., Swat, M., Herzel, H., Beule, D. 2004Biological Profiling of Gene Groups utilizing Gene Ontology – A Statistical Framework. arXiv:q-bio.GN/040703411
  3. Doniger, S., et al. 2003MAPPFinder: using Gene Ontology and GenMAPP to create a global gene-expression profile from microarray data. Genome Biol.4R7 · DOI
  4. Groth, D., et al. 2004GOblet: a platform for Gene Ontology annotation of anonymous sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res.32313–317 · DOI
  5. Martin, D., et al. 2004GOtcha: a new method for prediction of protein function assessed by the annotation of seven genomes. BMC Bioinformatics5178 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Zehetner, G. 2003OntoBlast function: from sequence similarities directly to potential functional annotations by ontology terms. Nucleic Acids Res.313799–3803 · DOI

Cited by

See all 11,495

Metadata

Authors
Conesa, A., Götz, S., García-Gómez, J. M., Terol, J., Talón, M., & Robles, M.
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2005-08-04
Volume
21
Issue
18
Pages
3674-3676
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2164154943
Cited by
11,495
References
2
FWCI
15.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.