Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 339

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improving molecular cancer class discovery through sparse non-negative matrix factorization

Open access
Gao, Y., Church, G.·2005·Bioinformatics

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Identifying different cancer classes or subclasses with similar morphological appearances presents a challenging problem and has important implication in cancer diagnosis and treatment. Clustering based on gene-expression data has been shown to be a powerful method in cancer class discovery. Non-negative matrix factorization is one such method and was shown to be advantageous over other clustering techniques, such as hierarchical clustering or self-organizing maps. In this paper, we investigate the benefit of explicitly enforcing sparseness in the factorization process. RESULTS: We report an improved unsupervised method for cancer classification by the use of gene-expression profile via sparse non-negative matrix factorization. We demonstrate the improvement by direct comparison with classic non-negative matrix factorization on the three well-studied datasets. In addition, we illustrate how to identify a small subset of co-expressed genes that may be directly involved in cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti653

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gao, Y., & Church, G.
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2005-10-21
Volume
21
Issue
21
Pages
3970-3975
ISSN
  • 0266-7061 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4803
  • 1460-2059
OpenAlex
W2092423825
Cited by
339
References
2
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.