The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving molecular cancer class discovery through sparse non-negative matrix factorization
Open accessAbstract
MOTIVATION: Identifying different cancer classes or subclasses with similar morphological appearances presents a challenging problem and has important implication in cancer diagnosis and treatment. Clustering based on gene-expression data has been shown to be a powerful method in cancer class discovery. Non-negative matrix factorization is one such method and was shown to be advantageous over other clustering techniques, such as hierarchical clustering or self-organizing maps. In this paper, we investigate the benefit of explicitly enforcing sparseness in the factorization process. RESULTS: We report an improved unsupervised method for cancer classification by the use of gene-expression profile via sparse non-negative matrix factorization. We demonstrate the improvement by direct comparison with classic non-negative matrix factorization on the three well-studied datasets. In addition, we illustrate how to identify a small subset of co-expressed genes that may be directly involved in cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns
Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O., & Botstein, D. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863 · Cited by 16,184
Monti, S., Tamayo, P., Mesirov, J., & Golub, T. (2003) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1023949509487 · Cited by 2,116
Cited by
Exploring tissue architecture using spatial transcriptomics
Rao, A., Barkley, D., França, G. S., & Yanai, I. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03634-9 · Cited by 1,700
Nonnegative Matrix Factorization: A Comprehensive Review
Wang, Y.-X., & Zhang, Y.-J. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2012.51 · Cited by 981
Nonnegative Matrix Factorization: An Analytical and Interpretive Tool in Computational Biology
Devarajan, K. (2008) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000029 · Cited by 454
Regulatory networks define phenotypic classes of human stem cell lines
Müller, F.-J., Laurent, L. C., Kostka, D., Ulitsky, I., Williams, R., Lu, C., Park, I.-H., Rao, M. S., Shamir, R., Schwartz, P. H., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07213 · Cited by 343
Yang, Z., & Michailidis, G. (2016) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv544 · Cited by 295
Feng, Y., Mitchison, T. J., Bender, A., Young, D. W., & Tallarico, J. A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2876 · Cited by 279
Detecting heterogeneity in single-cell RNA-Seq data by non-negative matrix factorization
Zhu, X., Ching, T., Pan, X., Weissman, S. M., & Garmire, L. (2017) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.2888 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, Y., & Church, G.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-10-21
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 3970-3975
- ISSN
- 0266-7061 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4803
- 1460-2059
- OpenAlex
- W2092423825
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.